Hideaki FUJII’s Post

View profile for Hideaki FUJII, graphic

Professor, Faculty of Economics, Kyoto Sangyo University

Where Has COP Gone?: Sunday, November 17, 2024 On November 11, 2024, the 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change began in Baku, the capital of the Republic of Azerbaijan on the coast of the Caspian Sea. Baku is home to the Baku oil fields, which greatly contributed to the Nobel family amassing vast wealth as oil magnates. The Nobel Brothers Petroleum Company was established there in 1878 and remained operational until it was nationalized by the Bolsheviks (Russian Communist Party) in 1920. In Baku, there is Yanar Dag (“Burning Mountain”), which is said to have been burning for thousands of years, as well as a temple of Zoroastrianism, a fire-worshiping religion. This is why Azerbaijan is known as the “Land of Fire.” Despite being held in this “Land of Fire,” COP29 is seeing major absences following the November 5 U.S. presidential election, where Trump, the Republican candidate who advocated during his campaign for a “second withdrawal from the Paris Agreement,” emerged victorious. Due to this, current U.S. President Biden, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Chinese and Brazilian leaders, and Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba are absent from the conference. Additionally, it was announced on November 14 that the Argentine delegation would be withdrawing from negotiations and returning home. Where has COP truly gone? The discussions at COP have become little more than international meetings focused on financial support (raising funds), with no concrete measures or effective international strategies for the most critical issue: reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, merely holding the conference itself might even contribute to increasing greenhouse gas emissions. Perhaps conducting the meetings online would be far more beneficial for the planet, or so I believe. Meanwhile, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal on November 12, Darren Woods, CEO of ExxonMobil, publicly opposed the U.S. re-withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. He cited the reasoning that large swings in environmental policy with each change in administration are detrimental to business. ExxonMobil, which has already invested substantial capital into low-carbon businesses, also views frequent policy changes as disruptive. Given ExxonMobil’s significant influence on U.S. energy policy, the CEO’s statement opposing a re-withdrawal from the Paris Agreement carries considerable weight.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics