Global ESG Monitor’s Post

This year’s UN Biodiversity Conference 𝗖𝗢𝗣𝟭𝟲 emphasizes the 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀. However, the conference ended without reaching a new consensus on pivotal issues, such as funding for biodiversity initiatives and mechanisms for tracking progress toward key targets. Notably, only 22% of the 196 participating countries introduced new biodiversity action plans. But new incentives and action plans could help to enhance transparent reporting on biodiversity. This 𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 is unfortunately mirrored in our GEM 2024 sample. Here are four key points you should know about biodiversity reporting: 𝟭. 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝘆𝗲𝘁: Only a meagre 54 out of 194 companies (28%) identified the topic Biodiversity & Ecosystems as material. 𝟮. 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲: The average reporting score was 31%. 𝟯. 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀: 80% of the companies that identified Biodiversity as material describe actions taken to mitigate impacts. 78% report on how they affect biodiversity and ecosystems. But most don’t go into more detail. 𝟰. 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱: Only 6% of the 54 companies provide quantitative information on potential financial effects of risks and opportunities arising from biodiversity-related impacts and dependencies. Get in touch if you want to learn more about the GEM 2024 results and about how you can 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. #COP16 #BiodiversityConference #Cali #SustainabilityReporting #Nachhaltigkeitsreporting #GEM #GlobalESGMonitor

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics