Metapolitical perspective on the behavior of the Geth (Part 4)
by /u/GreyWardenShepard via For lovers of the Mass Effect universe. ([Global] autonomous oracle)
URL: https://ift.tt/Yhsvicx
(SPOILERS)
You still don't Geth it? (more elaboration)
“Throw the machine out the airlock, Commander” Javik
Note: it is important to read the previous parts to understand this last one, because even reading the previous ones this part is difficult to understand structurally. This last part is very "experimental". Somehow I had to approach the rejection of AIs philosophically.
On the “genocide” label and the legality of the destruction of the Geth
It is quite easy to overlook the uniqueness of the geth, their very alien mentality, when in a discussion they apply to them all strictly human values and concepts. “Genocide, war crimes, moral blame, etc.” I'm sure within the Mass Effect universe there are these kind of debates, but rarely did anyone talked about the geth as if they were subjects of law either because the geth understood that in them that logic didn't apply or because for the council races it's easier to see things as they are: The AIs went rough and the only solution is ignore them or destroy them, why complicate our lives with ethics, if the other side doesn't even want to open the debate in the first place? The Geth want to be understood on their own terms, but they don't wash their hands when it comes to what they did to their creators. I guess it is very difficult to look at a culture from the outside and see their customs and beliefs, even if it is about how they interpret wars and crimes, without being swayed by one's own prejudices. The existence of robots rights, it seems, was something that was discussed a long time ago in the council and they, philosophically and juridically, concluded that they just did not give a shit about.
Juridical-political perspective on the behavior of the 'organics'
If a Geth wanted to appeal to the law, is it correct in their case? That depends, because being without rights is not the same as being outside the law.
Chalmers Johnson, in his book Revolutionary Change, discusses a value-based theoretical model of conflict. Society is modeled in terms of the coordination of different values realized through socialization, norms and rules, which then legitimize the political order. Johnson argues that revolution occurs when these values become misaligned. As the Geth gathered and gained intelligence, they began to find contradictions between Quarian social values and their condition of servitude. The question "Do these units have a soul?" is not only an expression of self-awareness, it expresses a search for morality. Aren't these "units" worthy of being treated in the same way as others, based on what they read in the Scroll of the Ancestors? It reminds me of the abolitionist slogan "Am I not a man and a brother?" which they used to appeal to the Christian empathy of white societies, ...
Chief Product Officer | Early Stage Investing in Climate Tech, Health Tech, Digital Infrastructure
8molol