It looks like the recent leak of Google Search API documentation that Rand Fishkin shared has stirred the SEO community. But for those of us who have been paying close attention, the revelations confirm what we've long suspected or already knew. NavBoost and Click Data: Already unveiled last year, the use of click data and user behaviour metrics like NavBoost to refine search results isn't surprising. We've known for years that Google utilises clickstream data from Chrome to improve its search algorithms, despite public denials. Whitelists in Sensitive Situations: The existence of whitelists during critical events like the COVID-19 pandemic and elections aligns with what we've already observed. Google has been known to prioritise authoritative sources during such times to ensure accurate information dissemination. Quality Raters' Influence: The role of human quality raters in shaping search rankings has always been a key part of Google’s strategy. It’s no secret that quality evaluations from real people are essential in training and refining the search algorithms. Click-Based Link Evaluation: The idea that Google uses click data to assess the quality of links fits perfectly with our understanding of modern SEO practices. The importance of genuine user engagement over mere link quantity has been evident for a while. Brand Importance: The leak confirms the critical role of brand recognition in search rankings. Building a strong, recognisable brand has always been the best strategy for achieving long-term SEO success, particularly when it comes to links. While the leak provides detailed documentation and insider confirmation, it's essentially a formal acknowledgement of what I've been discussing and adapting to for years. For those who have kept a finger on the pulse of SEO trends and Google’s evolving strategies, this leak is more validation than revelation. But for now, it's clear: Friday Agency has been on the right track all along. #SEO #Google #GoogleLeak #SearchEngineOptimisation
Gavin Duff’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
It would be nice to go a week or so without another major Google thing happening. Anyway... for those who didn't hear, an anonymous source shared leaked Google documentation showing that some things they had denied were algorithm factors actually are, or at least were at some point. Note: that doesn't *necessarily mean they're ranking factors, although some are. A lot of us SEOs kind of already assumed most of this. User click data, brand importance, etc. There are, of course, some things that are really nice to have verified. If you want to read the account of how it happened and the major talking points, here's Rand Fishkin's article about it: https://lnkd.in/efywNsT5 Here are some of the more local-focused SEO implications pulled and curated by the Local SEO Guide team: https://lnkd.in/eig-t-jy Some of Rand's major findings from the data are the importance of: 1. Clicks, CTR, long vs. short clicks, and user data influencing rankings 2. Use of Chrome browser clickstreams to power Google Search (using user click data to inform Sitelinks, etc) 3. Certain sites being "whitelisted" as authorities on particular topics 4. Click data being used to weight links in search results You can read the article to read all the implications. The takeaway for me (discussed also in this article) is that bigger brands are going to do better. Which, again, we know. However, it's more important than ever to build your brand. Not just through SEO but through all the channels that make sense. for you: social media, trade shows, advertising, PR... make your brand the known, trusted source for all things related to your business. Easier said than done, I know. But that's the ecosystem we're in and our task at hand. #seo #googleleak #ranking #googlealgorithm #google
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The most detailed analysis of Google Keywords Planner data I've read so far. Laurence also explains the case of Data transparency, and usefulness of this data. I learn't good things, hope you do too.
🤔 Ever wondered why some Google keyword search volumes stay exactly the same for months, while others change regularly? A client asked me this question recently, and what I discovered made me think about all the good that would come from the DoJ forcing Google to share accurate search volume data. So, shall we start a petition? After analyzing 60 MILLION keywords across multiple languages and countries, I uncovered Google's hidden bucketing system - they force ALL search volumes into just 60 predetermined ranges! This means: • Keywords need ~20-30% changes to show ANY month-on-month movement • High-volume terms are masked in huge ranges • Seasonal trends often completely disappear • Critical business & research decisions are based on artificial data Why does this matter NOW? The Department of Justice just won their landmark antitrust case against Google's search monopoly. Surely, this is our chance to push for change? 🎯 We need Google to provide: • Accurate data - no buckets, no close variants • Timely (ideally real-time) search volume data • Fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory terms • Pricing as close to zero as possible • Equal access to data at scale for all businesses This isn't just about SEO. Accurate search data could transform: • Public health monitoring • Emergency response systems • Economic planning • Business innovation • Academic research Ready to make a difference? Please: 1. Share this post 2. Tag @DOJAntitrust 3. Comment with #OpenSearchData 4. Read & share our full analysis: https://lnkd.in/epWbZcSs Together, we can push for more transparency in search data. The technology exists - it's time for change. #SEO #DigitalMarketing #GoogleAntitrust #SearchData #DOJ #SearchTransparency #DataAccess #GoogleMonopoly
Google Search Volumes Exposed: Complete Analysis of 60Mn Keywords into Volume Buckets
authoritas.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🤔 Ever wondered why some Google keyword search volumes stay exactly the same for months, while others change regularly? A client asked me this question recently, and what I discovered made me think about all the good that would come from the DoJ forcing Google to share accurate search volume data. So, shall we start a petition? After analyzing 60 MILLION keywords across multiple languages and countries, I uncovered Google's hidden bucketing system - they force ALL search volumes into just 60 predetermined ranges! This means: • Keywords need ~20-30% changes to show ANY month-on-month movement • High-volume terms are masked in huge ranges • Seasonal trends often completely disappear • Critical business & research decisions are based on artificial data Why does this matter NOW? The Department of Justice just won their landmark antitrust case against Google's search monopoly. Surely, this is our chance to push for change? 🎯 We need Google to provide: • Accurate data - no buckets, no close variants • Timely (ideally real-time) search volume data • Fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory terms • Pricing as close to zero as possible • Equal access to data at scale for all businesses This isn't just about SEO. Accurate search data could transform: • Public health monitoring • Emergency response systems • Economic planning • Business innovation • Academic research Ready to make a difference? Please: 1. Share this post 2. Tag @DOJAntitrust 3. Comment with #OpenSearchData 4. Read & share our full analysis: https://lnkd.in/epWbZcSs Together, we can push for more transparency in search data. The technology exists - it's time for change. #SEO #DigitalMarketing #GoogleAntitrust #SearchData #DOJ #SearchTransparency #DataAccess #GoogleMonopoly
Google Search Volumes Exposed: Complete Analysis of 60Mn Keywords into Volume Buckets
authoritas.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💥A bombshell dropped on the SEO community last month 💥 You could be excused for missing this if you're not paying attention, for it should be a big deal to anyone involved in marketing, digital or otherwise. On May 5th, Rand Fishkin received an email from an anonymous source claiming to have a massive leak of Google Search API documents. The leak, confirmed by ex-Googlers, reveals some startling contradictions to Google's public statements. The biggest thing here for SEOs is that it turns out that Google was lying to them, for YEARS about what was and wasn't part of the Google algorithm. Major claims from the leak: - Google’s “NavBoost” system uses clickstream data, initially gathered from Google Toolbar PageRank, to improve search quality. This system was a key motivator for creating Chrome. - Google uses cookie history, Chrome data, and pattern detection to fight click spam. - NavBoost scores queries for user intent, influencing search results based on clicks and engagement. - During events like the Covid-19 pandemic and elections, Google employed whitelists for certain websites. - These are just a few highlights. The leak contains over 2,500 pages of API documentation detailing Google’s internal processes and data collection. Why this matters: - Many of these insights contradict Google's denials about using click-centric user signals, subdomains, sandboxing, and domain age in rankings. This leak could reshape our understanding of SEO and Google’s ranking algorithms. - Rand Fishkin verified the authenticity of these documents with ex-Googlers and consulted with technical SEO experts, including Michael King, founder of iPullRank. Key Takeaways for B2B Marketers: 1. Build your Brand: Invest in building a strong, recognizable brand. This still matters above all else in B2B and all marketing. 2. Intent matters. Google will figure out what people were actually looking for in their search and float that up, and other things SEOs tend to focus on (like content and links) don't matter as much. If you actually generate demand for your product, this is a stronger signal to Google than anything else. 3. For newer companies and startups, SEO will not deliver much in terms of results until you've established a reputation and credibility in your market. #seo #b2bmarketing #marketing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Rand Fishkin received leaked Google Search API documents from an anonymous source, later revealed to be Erfan Azimi, an SEO practitioner. The documents suggest that Google uses click-centric user signals and other data, contradicting Google's public denials. Key findings include: NavBoost System: Utilizes clickstream data from tools like Chrome to improve search results. Data Utilization: Google allegedly uses cookie history, logged-in Chrome data, and other patterns to fight click spam and assess site quality. Whitelisting: Specific websites were prioritized or demoted for Covid-19 and election-related searches. Quality Rater Feedback: Human ratings play a role in Google's ranking systems. Link Evaluation: Click data influences how links are weighted in search rankings. Fishkin emphasizes the importance of transparency and the need for the SEO industry to critically evaluate Google's statements.
An Anonymous Source Shared Thousands of Leaked Google Search API Documents with Me; Everyone in SEO Should See Them - SparkToro
https://sparktoro.com/blog
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Leaked Google Ranking Details Reveal Key Insights! 🔥 The recent leak of Google's internal ranking documents provides a rare glimpse into their closely guarded algorithms. Here are the key actionable takeaways for businesses and SEOs: 1. User engagement metrics like click-through rates and satisfaction are crucial for higher rankings. Focus on optimizing for positive user signals. #SEO #UserEngagement 2. Building strong site authority and brand presence is essential. Invest in high-quality, original content to establish expertise. #SiteAuthority #BrandBuilding 3. New sites face a "sandbox" period. Plan your SEO strategy accordingly and be patient during the initial launch phase. #NewWebsites #SandboxPeriod 4. Chrome data and site-wide authority metrics are utilized, contrary to Google's past statements. Adapt your SEO approach based on these revelations. #ChromeData #DomainAuthority While this leak offers valuable insights, approach the information cautiously as Google's algorithms are complex and constantly evolving. Stay agile and data-driven in your SEO efforts. #GoogleLeaks #SEOStrategy https://lnkd.in/eE_ngCXg
Google Search Leak: Conflicting Signals, Unanswered Questions
searchenginejournal.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Did you hear about the recent leak of Google’s Search API documents? It's got everyone in the SEO world clutching their pearls, but what does it all mean? 🦪 Basically, what Google says and what Google does aren't always the same thing! (surprise, surprise) 🥤Here's a condensed version of some of the juiciest parts 🖱It confirm the use of click-centric user signals to influence rankings. This includes tracking “goodClicks,” “badClicks,” and user dwell time on pages. ⬇️ Subdomains ARE separately ranked in some contexts. 🦯 Just as we suspected—domain age IS a ranking factor. 🙀 Clickstream data from Chrome informs rankings. 🐼 Systems like NavBoost are shown to significantly influence site quality evaluations, linked to what we know as Panda updates. 🏳 Google uses whitelists for specific queries (e.g., Covid-19, elections). ❓ What should you do ❓ 👉 Work with your SEO agency to refine your marketing strategies. 👉 Focus on brand credibility and user engagement. 👉 Target specific regions and device types for greater localised relevance and better visibility. 👀 Read the full article here: https://loom.ly/Rk3_CV0 #Marketing #SEO #DigitalStrategy #leakedAPIdocs #MarketingInsights
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚨 Breaking News in SEO! 🚨 An anonymous source has shared thousands of leaked Google Search API documents with Rand Fishkin, revealing eye-opening details about Google's inner workings. Everyone in the SEO community should take note! 🔍 Leaked Documents Overview: Ranking Algorithms: Google's complex ranking system favors large, authoritative websites, using user engagement metrics and historical data. User Behavior Tracking: Extensive data collection on CTR, dwell time, and bounce rates to adjust search rankings dynamically. Search Result Manipulation: Evidence of manual adjustments in search results to enhance user experience, raising fairness and transparency concerns. API Usage and Access: Strict controls on internal APIs used by Google employees for search data access and testing changes. 📈 Impact on SEO: Highlights the crucial role of user engagement metrics in SEO strategies. Traditional SEO practices may need to adapt to Google's data-driven and evolving algorithms. 💡 Rand Fishkin's Commentary: Calls for greater transparency from Google regarding its search algorithms. Emphasizes ethical considerations in the development and application of search algorithms. 🌐 Reactions and Future Outlook: Mixed reactions from the SEO community, with growing calls for Google to address these issues. Potential for increased scrutiny from regulators and the public. Possible regulatory changes to ensure fair and transparent search practices. 📢 Key Takeaway: The leaked Google Search API documents shed light on Google's search algorithms, user data collection, and result manipulation, underscoring the need for transparency and ethical practices in SEO and search engine operations. Read the full details on SparkToro's blog and join the conversation! 🌟 https://lnkd.in/grUAzjJM #SEO #GoogleSearch #SearchEngineOptimization #DigitalMarketing #Transparency #EthicalSEO #Hemant4you #SEOtips #Googleranking #Rankingupdate
An Anonymous Source Shared Thousands of Leaked Google Search API Documents with Me; Everyone in SEO Should See Them - SparkToro
https://sparktoro.com/blog
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚨 Google Search Ranking Signals Leaked! 🚨 Take a look At what Google Has Taught us wrong about Search Engine Ranking Systems: 1-Understanding Navboost and Click Data: Through features like "goodClicks" and "badClicks," Google refines its ranking system based on user engagement, including click length and impressions. 2-Chrome Browser Clickstreams: Since 2005, Google has aimed to capture user click data, now achieved through Chrome. This data helps identify popular URLs for features like sitelinks. 3-Whitelists for Sensitive Topics: Google maintains whitelists for sectors like travel, Covid, and politics, ensuring credible information surfaces for critical queries. 4-Quality Rater Feedback: Human evaluations from platforms like EWOK may directly influence search rankings, emphasizing the importance of quality content. 5-Click Data and Link Weighting: Google classifies links based on click data, boosting rankings for high-quality links while ignoring low-quality ones. Key Insights for Marketers: 1-Build a Strong Brand: Establishing a reputable brand outside of Google is crucial. 2-Focus on User Intent: Understanding user behavior and intent can give you an edge over traditional SEO tactics. 3-Stay Updated: Keep abreast of evolving SEO factors and industry trends. Hopefully, You Got Some idea between the real Ranking Systems vs What Google Has Taught Us, Thanks For Reading Source 1: https://lnkd.in/gJxgPZGw Source 2: https://lnkd.in/gQadKcfX #SEO #GoogleSearch #DigitalMarketing #TechInsights #MarketingStrategy #SearchEngineOptimization #ContentStrategy #DigitalInsights #googleleaks
To view or add a comment, sign in