Felix P. Nater. CSC’s Post

U.S. Secret Service Report on Mass Shootings…2016-2020 - issues of retaliation based on perception - history of physical violence - pass examples of threatening & intimidating behavior. https://bit.ly/3kIO4pp #AskFelixNater #WorkplaceViolencePrevention

https://bit.ly/3kIO4pp

https://bit.ly/3kIO4pp

secretservice.gov

To read this report is to gain a deeper understanding into the mindset of the attackers. Attackers who may very well be our employee, our student, teacher, patient, spouse. It forces the question of what are workplaces and educational institutions doing about violence prevention? The obvious is neither understood or recognized as problematic. What makes someone go over the edge? A few years ago a college student called me to share her emotional predicament. Being told that the final grade to her class would be predicated on the submission of their report by a specified dated. She was aware that failure meant not graduating in May. She approached the professor to request an extension that was given due to a family funeral. The report was hand delivered to the professor herself. She was told that class grades would be posted for all to see. Upon her return her name did not appear as a passing grade. The professor did not remember the conversation. In a fit of anger she told me she felt like killing him but knew the consequences. The level head person prevailed.

Jules F. in my incident assessment services performed as a 3rd party investigator the Secret Service Report is spot on. I found retaliation based on perception frequently between employees and managers who alleged unfairness in assignments, promotions, opportunities and friendship. The saying “if it walked like a duck, quacked like a duck, it was a duck” was associated with the history of prior violence adjudicated and resolved under last chance agreements. Often times recipients of such oppprtunities couldn not contain their predilection for violence. Past examples of threatening & intimidating behaviors always were indicators of future behavior. So true.

Binu B . Thanks for Engaging with me on this discussion, I appreciate your interest.

Thanks for Engaging with me on this discussion Nataraj S

Like
Reply

Your interest inspires me to greater heights, Jules F.

Grateful for your interest in this discussion. Your thoughts are welcomed. Ben Nater Imtiaz Ahmed Shadin Hossain Soufiane Hamdaoui If you are a workplace security consultant specializing in workplace violence prevention like Nater Associates Ltd., there’s more to it than active shooter training. The U.S. Secret Service Report offers the proactive consultant reach insight.

Julie F.

Executive Management & Client Services Professional; Seasoned eDiscovery Manager; In-house eDiscovery subject matter expert for 18 years with GE Company

3mo

Wow, Felix. That is eye opening and truly concerning.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics