FEDmanager’s Post

The United States' 2-party farce and stranglehold on the electorate has brought us voters a quite unsatisfactory and untrustworthy duo of candidates for the 2024 presidential election. These 2 people cannot be my (like many others) elected leaders-period! Money, party-power-politics and reliance on manipulating a broken political system (as broken as the other public systems) has brought about no effective change (governance or social), no 'best' candidate practices and relies on self-interested and under-qualified elected officials (and their following appointments). PA 101... An under educated, emotionally evoked via media, and misled public has to manage with the lesser-evil of 2 poor public/world leaders. Who essentially loses when the public does not maintain the best leadership? Critical thinking about critical leadership issues...

Political figures across the world who are open to respectful criticism, both from the opposition and the general public, stand to gain a lot in the long term, especially during election times. Additionally, the public shows a lot of faith in leaders whose policies they can share their views on without fear. .............. These words highlight the importance of leaders being open to respectful criticism and engaging with their constituents in a transparent and inclusive manner. This approach can indeed have numerous benefits, both for the leaders themselves and for the democratic process as a whole. When leaders are receptive to criticism and feedback, they demonstrate a commitment to accountability, humility, and a willingness to learn and improve. This can foster trust and credibility with the public, as citizens feel that their voices are being heard and valued. In turn, this can lead to increased support and loyalty, particularly during election times. Moreover, leaders who encourage open dialogue and debate can benefit from a more informed and nuanced understanding of the issues, as they are exposed to diverse perspectives and ideas. This can help them develop more effective policies and make better decisions, which can ultimately benefit the country or community they serve. Furthermore, when citizens feel that they can share their views without fear of retribution or censorship, they are more likely to engage in the democratic process, participate in public discourse, and hold their leaders accountable. This can lead to a more vibrant and healthy democracy, where citizens are empowered to shape the direction of their country. Some notable examples of leaders who have successfully employed this approach include: 1. Barack Obama, who was known for his willingness to engage with critics and opponents, and for his commitment to transparency and accountability. 2. Angela Merkel, who has been praised for her open and inclusive leadership style, and for her willingness to listen to diverse perspectives and adapt her policies accordingly. 3. Jacinda Ardern, who has been recognized for her empathetic and inclusive approach to leadership, and for her commitment to engaging with citizens and listening to their concerns. In contrast, leaders who are resistant to criticism and feedback can suffer from a lack of trust and credibility, as citizens may perceive them as out of touch or unaccountable. This can ultimately harm their reputation and undermine their ability to lead effectively. Overall, your observation highlights the importance of leaders being open to respectful criticism and engaging with their constituents in a transparent and inclusive manner. By doing so, they can build trust, foster a more informed and engaged citizenry, and ultimately make better decisions that benefit the country or community they serve.

When we talk about humility as a critical function of effective leadership, we’re underscoring the power and importance of consistently seeking input and feedback, without hubris and an over reliance on our expertise or knowledge. Experts — however knowledgeable in their field — can benefit from a diversity of perspectives. In a new paper coauthored with Piotr Swistak, Stanford Professor Jonathan Bendor argues that while expertise, hierarchy, and meritocracy are critical in a democracy, they can’t operate without appropriate oversight. “Nonspecialists need to hold people accountable,” he says. “Otherwise, you get little groups that aren’t accountable to anybody.” As democracies turn to specialists to solve big issues, Professor Jonathan Bendor says non-experts should still hold them accountable. Always, and especially as we navigate another election season, let’s anchor in the critical role of accountability as precisely what unifies democracy and meritocratic bureaucracy. #CivicLeadership

What's next after the US elections on 5 November? EY Geostrategic group will on the 6 November host a US post-elections webcast that will explore impacts of the US election outcome and broader geopolitical and economic policy trends. Panellists will also delve into legislative and regulatory shifts including implications for tax, trade, and the macroeconomic environment. Register below to get a better understanding of what 's next. https://lnkd.in/d-aEECDb

As we trawl through the General Election process in the UK, we learn that leadership - real leadership - is more critical than ever. I am extremely disappointed with the quality of leadership displayed by the main political leaders: wooden, scripted, phoney, and untruthful. The UK looks set to go to the dogs whichever main party gets in power. Many years ago I was involved in delivering leadership programmes at Warwick University to political leaders at the local level (via Pascoe Sawyers and Grace. Collins MBE who organised it all brilliantly). The courses were great and the councillors really wanted to learn and practice leadership skills. Why it it, at the top level, we have reached such a depressing level of moronic inability - recitation of memes, memes, memes, as if the British public were stupid and couldn't understand a paragraph of engaging prose? Well, we are where we are. On the bright side, here are three powerful metaphors that encapsulate what leadership is about: One, leadership is a performance (but not a circus), which means it's about results, real results, results that make a real difference. Two, leadership is intrinsically connected to teamwork, and so not about jockeying for position and stabbing members of your own team in the back at the first available opportunity (eg. Sunak on Johnson, Starmer on Corbyn!). Three, leadership is about 'play', which is in the double sense of having fun or enjoying what you do, and also in the sense of being creative. Being creative, of course, ties back to performance: creative solutions to old problems, not the same-old-same-old (when will we fix the NHS instead of keep talking about it or pouring money into it?). Let's all demand a higher quality of leadership - a topic perhaps that should be taught at school level? I shall certainly be voting elsewhere at this election, wasted vote or not! Linda Sale FRSA Michael Pietrack Andrew Benson Brown Ali Stewart Kate Turner Susannah Brade-Waring, MSc, FRSA Bevis Moynan Jane Thomas Tobias Ellwood David Sidwick Ernie White The Rt. Hon. Sir Conor Burns Ethan Thoburn Mike Maryon Cheryl Butler Chris Smith Clare Blair Mark Terrell Richard Knight Paul Ward Cassandra Andrews

For our democracy to function properly, Americans need to see pragmatic, principled leaders who leverage their positions of power in order to get things done that actually matter. Read more: https://lnkd.in/eH5YFjiQ

With a new Labour government in place and the Conservatives in the middle of a leadership contest, this year's political party conferences signal a new chapter for UK politics. Join us for the POLITICO Pro Debrief, where our financial services team of seasoned conference-goers will break down: ✅ Key policy developments that could impact your business ✅ What really matters behind the headlines and politicking ✅ Insider tips on navigating the conference scene (and finding the best parties! 🎉) 30 minutes to go! Register now https://lnkd.in/eBfhJptY #UKPolitics #PartyConferences #PolicyUpdate #Finance #Leadership

As Election Night approaches on Tuesday, November 5, our role as leaders in shaping responsible and effective organizations becomes even more crucial. Here are five leadership duties to prioritize during this pivotal time: 1. Promote Civic Engagement: Encourage our teams to participate in the electoral process. Informed voting is a cornerstone of civic responsibility. 2. Foster Respectful Dialogue: Ensure that our work environment respects diverse political beliefs. Promoting open, respectful discussions helps build mutual understanding and tolerance. 3. Lead by Example: Demonstrate ethical leadership and integrity in all interactions. Our actions should inspire trust and confidence. 4. Stay Informed: Keep abreast of the developments and implications of the election. A well-informed leader is better equipped to make decisions that will align with both domestic and global shifts. 5. Plan for the Future: Regardless of the outcomes, consider the implications of the election on our business and prepare to adapt strategies as necessary. Proactive leadership will be crucial in navigating post-election realities. These responsibilities underscore our commitment to guiding our organizations with foresight, integrity, and an unwavering dedication to the principles of leadership and community involvement.

Interesting news: The polls show clearer and clearer advantage for #KamalaHarris. (while her opponent keeps acting according to his old playbook of false claims and narratives). Regardless from the elections, an interesting common learning for leadership and transformations of all sizes: #Authentic #valuebased #leadership #wins. Link to new polls in the comments 👇 #Leadership #People #Growth ELLING INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING GROUP

The Hubris of Leadership The political developments of the last days have highlighted the challenges faced by leaders like President Emmanuel Macron and President Joe Biden. As Macron's party loses ground and Biden champions his role as the antidote to Trump, questions about their leadership approaches become unavoidable. Are these leaders too assured in their indispensability, disconnected from the evolving needs of their electorates? Macron’s third-place finish in France's parliamentary elections, coupled with Biden's insistence on his singular capability to govern despite a faltering debate performance, prompts a deeper reflection. How much does the hubris of indispensability alienate leaders from those they serve? Are their strategies effectively addressing the populist waves that elevate figures like Marine Le Pen and Donald Trump, who claim to voice the 'real' concerns of the people? Moreover, as Biden’s advanced age becomes obvious, one must ask: is it apparent to everyone but him and his close advisers that a new approach might be needed? Leadership demands not just experience but adaptability and a profound connection with societal undercurrents. In navigating these tumultuous political waters, how can leaders ensure they remain in touch with their constituents and genuinely address the complexities of modern governance? Is there room for a more inclusive dialogue that not only counters populism but addresses real underlying concerns and sustainable solutions? These are some of the critical questions as we consider the future of leadership, highlighting the need for humility, empathy, and a readiness to adapt in response to the changing dynamics of our world. (Picture New York Times)