Farah Natasha Mohd Fuad’s Post

"The Critical Role of Business Analysts in Software Testing" A business analyst plays a crucial role in software testing by bridging the gap between stakeholders and the development team. They ensure that the software meets business requirements and user needs, translating complex business processes into clear testing criteria. By defining detailed test scenarios and acceptance criteria, they help identify potential issues early, reducing costly fixes later. Their deep understanding of business processes allows them to validate that the software delivers value, ensuring it aligns with strategic goals. By collaborating closely with testers, developers, and stakeholders, they facilitate a comprehensive testing approach, enhancing overall software quality and user satisfaction.

📝 If you find yourself in a business analyst role on an IT project, it’s likely that at some point you’ll need to create a functional specification – and these can take many different forms depending on the methodologies in place at your organization. ❓ But what is a functional specification? ❓ Why do you create a functional specification? ❓ And, perhaps more importantly, what goes into a document like this? ✅ The purpose of a functional specification is to define the requirements to be implemented by the software solution. 💡 Now, as business analysts, not all aspects of our solutions are software-based. A perfectly legitimate solution to a business problem could involve a business process change, organizational change, or even a configuration adjustment. 📌 But since so much of business today is supported directly by IT systems, many times solving a problem means upgrading or building new software…and that means specifying functional requirements. 👉 Click here for a quick video tutorial on functional requirements and specifications --> https://buff.ly/3LCH8EG

BRD: Business Requirements Document MRD: Market Requirements Document PRD: Product Requirements Document FSD: Functional Specifications Document  >>>>>>>>>As a Product Manager or a Business Analyst, ensure you create relevant, usable documentation. Try to understand when to use each or how they complement each other. 😏 😏

As a Business Analyst, you are often required to create various documents throughout the project lifecycle. Some of the most . mmonly used documents that you may need to prepare frequently include: 1. Proposal 2. Business Requirements Document (BRD) 3. Functional Requirements Document (FRD) 4. Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) 5. Gap Analysis There are a plethora of terms and terminology for various documents  Specification Documents like – 1. SRS – System Requirement Specifications  2. FRS – Functional Requirement Specifications  3. BRS – Business Requirement Specification  4. CRS- Compatibility Requirements Specifications  5. PRS – Performance Requirements Specifications  6. RRS- Reliability Requirements Specifications  7. CRS-Configurations Requirements Specification    Requirement Documents like – 1. BRD – Business Requirement Document  2. SRD – System Requirement Document I've covered some topics, including: SRS (Software Requirements Specification) FRD (Functional Requirements Document) SRS vs. FRD BRD (Business Requirements Document) BRD vs. Proposal Proposal Note - If anyone thinks there are additional topics to include or if anything should be removed, please comment.

A Business Analyst (BA) plays a crucial role in connecting business requirements with technological solutions. Acting as a liaison between stakeholders and technology teams, BAs delve into problems, collect requirements, and strategize enhancements for processes, systems, or products. They are akin to problem-solvers, adept at deciphering business demands, pinpointing obstacles, and articulating solutions for implementation by developers or other departments. The primary aim of a BA is to guarantee that the end product aligns with the business's requisites, brings value, and aids in accomplishing strategic goals.

📋 Backlog Items: Why Some Come Back As a Business System Analyst, managing the backlog is like maintaining a dynamic to-do list. Items are removed when completed or when it’s decided that no further work will be done on them. However, sometimes these items find their way back into the backlog. Why does this happen? Let’s explore! ➡️ Why Items Get Re-Added to the Backlog 1️⃣ Changing Stakeholder Needs Business environments are always evolving, and stakeholders may adjust their priorities. Example: A feature to integrate a third-party payment gateway was initially deprioritized and removed from the backlog because stakeholders decided to focus on core features first. However, after customer feedback highlighted the importance of offering multiple payment options, the integration feature was re-added to the backlog to address this new demand. 2️⃣ Time-Consuming Taáks An underestimated task may require more time than initially planned, forcing it to return for re-evaluation. Example: A seemingly simple API integration turns out to require additional security checks, pushing it back to the backlog. 3️⃣ Delays Due to Other Priorities High-priority items taking longer than expected can delay lower-priority tasks, pushing them back into the queue. Example: A critical bug fix consumes the team’s time, leaving less capacity for planned feature work. 4️⃣ Defects in the Work Product Sometimes, a completed task doesn’t meet quality standards or has defects that need resolution. Example: A newly deployed report fails to pull accurate data due to a missed edge case, and it’s sent back for corrections. ➡️ Why It Matters Understanding why items reappear in the backlog helps teams identify root causes, manage priorities more effectively, and continuously improve processes. By being flexible and responsive to these scenarios, you can keep your backlog organized and your project on track. 💬 How does your team handle re-added backlog items? Share your thoughts below!

Tip/reminder to business systems analyst: Keep your ears and eyes open for system(s) update(s) that aren't managed by your team. In the past I've experienced a time when a system the team didn't manage received a version upgrade... The end result for us; we received several issues/bug reports regarding our system. After further research, it was deemed that due to the other system receiving a version update, unfortunately, our system was impacted. Lesson learned: Stay up to date with other teams systems updates/releases; it impact the systems your team manage. Ways to stay updated: -Inquire/ensure your team receives release management email notifications. -Some companies have a directory of all systems providing information of system updates. -Make sure you're aware of all systems that impact the systems your team manages. -Build connections with members from other teams in which both teams provide a FYI/reminder of system updates/upgrades/patching... The objective is to be proactive and communicate to your end users of future impacts/issues rather than reactive.

The task. Business analyst is working in the project department in implementing team. After implementation the customer found something to fix. It’s a product issue that project team haven’t found during implementation. Who is responsible for the failure? a) Product team - because they developed with bug b) Project business analyst - because he hasn’t found this bug before user testing c) both Let’s discuss?)

The different types of requirements a Business Analyst should be familiar with. To make it even clearer, here's a brief summary of each type and their key characteristics: 1. Business Requirements 2. User Requirements 3. System Requirements 4. Functional Requirements 5. Non-Functional Requirements 6. Transition Requirements Understanding these types helps in clearly defining what needs to be achieved (business requirements), how it should be achieved from a user perspective (user requirements), the technical needs (system requirements), specific system behaviors (functional requirements), performance and quality standards (non-functional requirements), and the process for transitioning to the new system (transition requirements).