Ethar A.’s Post

View profile for Ethar A., graphic

Founder at ReallyRecycle.com | "The only founder standing for true sustainability" | Circular Economy | CleanTech | Deep Generalist | Involuntary Activist | Voice Recognition Wrangler

So I talk about this a lot. What's interesting is how the wiki article talks of "risks enabling". No As you know I do t talk about a lot of things that can't be modelled. This is modellable. And it's not a risk. It's guaranteed. Popper, in his famous saying, made the mistake of assuming that a nation tolerant of intolerance, ultimately eventually stops doing that. It doesn't. There isn't a model run that has ever resulted in anything other than the total annihilation of tolerance and civil liberties. His mistake is that he didn't recognise that by the time a society has accepted intolerance, it is already too late. This is something the Remain movement also got wrong from 2016. It's something even I engaged in. Enabling a discourse, street stalls, conversations are themselves an expression and acceptance of tolerance of intolerance. Arguably, this leads to a problem. The only solution is perpetrators should be jailed without a debate. Article 17 of the ECHR/HRA should be enforced way more than it currently is.

View profile for 🍀 MARTIN - 'MURPH' - MURPHY🍀 FRGS, graphic

Adventure Learning Designer- Speaker, Facilitator & Wild Coach 🌍Author: 'From Mercenaries to Missionaries' 🌍 Adventure Mind Ambassador-Bold Leadership-Dynamic Teams + Community Resilience: Contact [email protected]

🧩 The Tolerance Paradox: The Challenge of Inclusivity in Dynamic Teams 🧩 Karl Popper’s Tolerance Paradox poses a tough reality: Unlimited tolerance, especially toward intolerant viewpoints, can actually undermine the very foundations of an open society. This is especially crucial for teams striving to be adaptive and high-performing. In the world of dynamic teaming, true inclusivity means embracing diverse perspectives but also knowing when to challenge views that threaten psychological safety and team cohesion. When intolerance goes unchecked, it creates an environment where innovation and collaboration cannot thrive. Setting boundaries around what will and won’t be tolerated helps foster resilience and shared respect within a group. Teams with a balanced approach to tolerance don’t merely coexist; they push each other forward with open, respectful dialogue and challenge. Embracing this mindset can lead to empowered, self-organising teams that are equipped to navigate complexity together. #ToleranceParadox #DynamicTeaming #KarlPopper #EffectiveLeadership #AdaptiveTeams #PsychologicalSafety #InnovationCulture #ResilientTeams

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics