Erin Seidler, MPA’s Post

View profile for Erin Seidler, MPA, graphic

Healthcare Public Relations + Public Affairs + Policy

Erin here, back again with a Real Chemistry readout of the health policy discussion few are talking about from last night’s VP debate with Leslie Isenegger, MPP.   Over an hour into the debate, Senator JD Vance and Governor Tim Walz were asked about the cost of healthcare. The back and forth mostly focused on who has done more to strengthen the Affordable Care Act (Vance seemingly countering efforts by the Trump administration to weaken the law). But Vance echoed Trump’s vow to repeal the ACA and touted pre-ACA high risk pools, which led to a sharp rebuke from Walz.     On drug pricing, it’s no surprise that Gov. Walz highlighted the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program as key to VP Harris’s efforts to bring down costs. Vance claimed the average increase in drug prices under the Trump administration was 1.5% compared to a 7% increase under the Biden administration.     Vance appeared to be citing a HHS report tracking drug prices from 2017-2023. He may have conflated a 7% average price increase on single source drugs from 2022-2023, which was due to price increases on higher priced drugs, with a different statistic that showed 1.6% increase in the consumer price index from 2017-2018. Interestingly, neither candidate mentioned the $35 insulin cap despite both candidates taking credit for that measure.      This debate demonstrated that both candidates would plan to make drug prices a priority of their administrations, despite reports that Congressional Republicans are targeting Medicare price negotiation as a target for repeal in 2025.   https://lnkd.in/dHssXaPe

  • No alternative text description for this image
Cindy Dilliner

Administrative Assistant with M&A, Securities, Renewable Fuels Sector and Government Relations Experience

1mo

Repealing ACA scares me. My mom was one of those people caught in a "dead zone" before ACA. My dad was forced to take early retirement from the railroad due to a medical issue, leaving my mom with only the major medical coverage that his rr insurance gave to spouses. My mom was diabetic, had pancreatitis and had recently had a triple heart bypass. Obviously no health care provider was going to offer her insurance to supplement the major medical. And she was nowhere near old enough to be on Medicare and they weren't eligible for Medicaid. They paid out of pocket for a couple of years for every prescription and, obviously needed, regular checkups. My mom is now 79. I don't think a majority of voters even know what it was like to not have the protections for pre-existing conditions afforded to us by the ACA. Or have thought about any potential that they might no longer be able to cover the insurance costs for their children until age 26.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics