𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐃 𝐀𝐆𝐄 (𝐌𝐲 2025 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧)
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘥. 𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘓𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘖𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘵.
The ad industry is at a precipice, and is imminently going to tip into entirely new territory, and no, it's not going to be caused by AI (at least not primarily).
The dual illusions underpinning our industry - 1. that there is an infinite supply of quality media and 2. that marketing effectiveness can be measured with precise, deterministic attribution - will soon be confronting reality that neither of these are nor have ever been true.
With these changes will emerge a familiar but revolutionary innovation that will save the internet, journalism, and democracy.
I’ve laid out the full narrative here and in the links below along with a brief summary, that explains why these changes are inevitable, how they will affect consumers, publishers, and advertisers, and why this will create a healthy media ecosystem and ad industry.
1. 𝐀 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐂𝐫𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 - For the first time in over a decade, we will experience supply scarcity according to how marketers assign value to media ("addressable impressions" and "In-stream" aka premium video).
2. 𝐀𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞 - Instead of the commoditization we’ve seen built off of universal (and typically incorrect) identifiers, all media will be valued according to its richness on 2 dimensions - what is known about the audience that consumes that media, and the likelihood of attention the media/placements will capture.
3. 𝐀𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭, 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐫-𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐔𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐬 & 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 - All premium/valuable/unique content will be placed behind a gate that users can unlock with their money, data, or time/attention. Advertisers will play a crucial role here and be part of that fair-value exchange.
For those that want to see the full narrative of what that will look like, watch the recording of me walking through the preso here or check out the full pitch deck or Loom recording linked in the comments.
There are many nuances here, some of which I surely did not explicitly address above, and I welcome all questions and feedback which I'll gladly respond to.
More than anything, I encourage everybody in this space to heed this message, to consider the probability that my assertions are correct (more than 0%, less than 100%), and prepare your businesses accordingly. If I can help provide guidance on how you can get there (pro bono unless you have really deep pockets), feel free to reach out.
Hey everyone, my name is Era. The Internet is about to change. It's going to bring us into what I call the gated age and the subtext here is why now is the time for the rewarded web. So I'm just going to jump right into it. We've got a huge disconnect in the media landscape, so time and attention from consumers. We know it's a scarce resource, it's really finite, but somehow we've convinced everyone that add inventory ad supply is infinite. It's bottomless. There's always more of it and somehow it's always growing. This is a gigantic. Disconnect and we're gonna have to eventually square that. So what's going to happen I believe is that we're going to experience a huge supply crunch in the industry. And now supply the way that most people think about impressions and avails is not going to decrease. But the way that buyers assign value to that supply, that is what's going to shrink materially. And there's a couple of different things that are happening in the market. But to understand it's how do buyers sign value to media? And there's really one of two ways today, especially in the digital area, but even beyond one is with some sort of user identifier. That's been cookies for targeting for attribution and those are going away sometime and it's going to make a huge difference in terms of how much supply is there for buyers to to target and to monetize. And the other way that buyers assign value is just this concept of like premium high attention media. And there's a lot of different ways to look at that. But one very clear scaled signal that we've seen in digital is this like in stream video, right, like premium sound on large full player video that's very high. Attention that that standard was not ideal. It had sort of been corrupted overtime and so that got reclassified. But right now most of the industry out there is not really in stream. When that reclassification from two years ago actually proliferates, hopefully in the next couple of months, we're going to see a significant reduction in the amount of this sort of instream supply that buyers assign value to just because it says it's in stream. Those two changes along with other changes that just sort of decrease the amount. Have had, you know, time that users would be spending on ads, being exposed to ads is going to contribute to the supply crunch and that's going to lead to a massive change into the media landscape. So a couple of sort of high level trends. We came from this era where, you know, the broadcast era, most media could not be tied to an actual purchase in an outcome. And so most media was there to drive awareness, mental availability like a TV. You would remember that brand when you're at the supermarket and make the purchase, but you couldn't actually tie that back and do that direct attribution. The Internet changed that in this precision era that we're in, which is you were able to actually tie at least attribute, right? Or correlation than necessarily causation. But you did see that campaigns impressions, media that was able to say, hey, I served this ad to a user and then the user bought this product, they got more and more budget. And so we saw the bottom of the funnel overall grow at the expense of the top of the funnel. What we're going to see now as we sort of lose those identifiers in this prediction era is a better balance and we're going to see budgets start to come back toward that middle and upper funnel because. It's just frankly going to be harder to do that direct attribution for every single media impression that someone is buying. So I think this is going to lead to a big deep commoditization. We've basically had media become a commodity. If all you do is focus on the audience, you don't really care where they are. And so you're just paying based on who that user is and the likelihood of them buying a certain product. And you don't care if they're on the New York time or they're on some random site that you've never heard of before. What we're going to see is the commoditization. I believe it's going to be based on these sort of two dimensions. One is whether you have a lot of audience data or something sort of meaningful in the audience data for that. Sort of publish or that impression or you don't. And then the other dimension is how a high attention that ad is, right? How intrusive is it? How hard is it for someone to avoid or ignore they're gonna have to notice it versus these ads that are really kind of more adjacent and run on the side. And so we're going to see a really a bifurcation there based on the relative balance of demand and supply for each of these quadrants and that top right where you have high attention. Kids that do have audience data attached to it it's gonna be a lot of demand that's what all the buyers, premium brand buyers want but there's gonna be very little supply and so the prices there are gonna be through the roof relative to others and we're going to see a little bit of a change I'm going to go through this really quickly but ultimately you're going to see that highest quality highest value medium the top right those other two quadrants where demand and supply are going to be a little bit more same balance are going to be in this sort of medium quality and medium value and then you're gonna see where like. Infinite supply, right like AI generated sites and made MFA, there's gonna be so much supply, but most of the demand doesn't want it. So it'll be the lowest quality you're going to see prices adjust and so not just prices, just the the supply versus the demand how much spend is going to go there how that spend is actually going to transact in reservations and guarantees and PMP's and then that relative range of the CPM's not actual CPMS that top right, it's saying 8 to 10 that's on the scale of 10 those who are going to be. With the $100 plus CTV ads with a first party audience are going to be very, very expensive, but you're gonna see sort of more moderate prices, but buyers are gonna start to pay according to where that either that publisher or that impression falls within these 4 quadrants. And now really important point that most of the solutions that people are talking about today are focused on getting more of that audience data, universal ID's and other ways to to to find audiences and to do sort of the measurement and attribution. There's not as many folks focusing on that bottom sort of like creating more of that high attention media. And I do think that at a high level, we've seen that imbalance in price to value. So value I think. Based on the sort of attention and quality of an ad or the attributable sort of incremental impact that it has to an outcome versus the CPMS versus what buyers are paying. And this is way off kilter right now. You see a lot of these different unique or merging formats are below the screen line. In theory, everything should be right on the screen line. The more value you have, the more buyer would pay for it. What we're going to see when the market shakes out everything above this line comes down everything. Below this line comes up and the size of the bubbles change. And so standard displays overvalued, Standard out stream is overvalued, search is not here, but search is definitely overvalued given sort of how much buyers rely on last click and brand search and things like that and give it too much credit. And so you're going to see those circles, those pies shrink and those budgets are going to shift. And so everything here below the line, I believe 1 is going to get more expensive, but you're also going to see those pies grow and that is very relevant. To to sort of what I think is going to be some of the, the changes. So the Internet is sort of, it requires a balance, users, publishers and advertisers. You need to have a perfect balance where everyone is getting that fair value exchange. The problem that we have is that the Internet, we've sort of came in with the premise that users thought the Internet was free. It wasn't free, but it was an implicit tradeoff. A user came, they got the content and they didn't have to pay for it. They gave up usually their data usually without consent and theory. Your time and attention. But in reality, most of the ads were running adjacent to the content and they were mostly ignoring them. Not to say that some of them didn't work, some of them didn't get attention, but most of them did not. That's going to change. What we're going to enter is a place where a time where we're going to have an explicit tradeoff. Users are going to try to get to content, and in order to unlock that content, they're going to have to pay for it with their money, with their data, or with their time and attention. And that's what brings me to this. Would have gated age, unlock media, whatever the sort of name is going to be called. But you're going to see premium sites like this. I've got a bunch of subscriptions like you do. I've got subscription fatigue as well, like you do. I'm not subscribed to The Atlantic. I love the Atlantic. I love reading two articles a month from Jonathan Hyder, whoever else, and I go there. But now when I go, it says subscribe or scram. And so I don't subscribe. It's too expensive for me for two articles a month. What we're going to see is that publishers like this. Are gonna start offering a different choice for users and they say thank you for coming to our site it costs US money to produce this content in order to support us in order to access this here are your options. You can watch this short ad. You can answer a survey you can give us your e-mail you can become a subscriber you can make a micro payment Every publisher that has unique valuable premium you know content that can't be it's not it's distinguishable it's not something that somebody can just go and get somewhere else. Is going to be able to offer this. Now, the beauty of this is that the the video landscape is about to experience this drastic change. This is in theory the four different types of video ads, the placements that are available today according to the new standard. And so in stream is what you know, it's the sound is on, it's sort of that premium content. You have these two in the middle that's like traditional outstream, those are muted. And then you have interstitials, which historically was apps and games. Now it's expanding beyond that in stream. Right now only the walled gardens and sort of CTV players can create that. And when we're going to see this supply crunch when sort of the faux stream is is properly proliferated, you know that the new standards proliferated. We're going to see that in stream get really expensive because it's very scarce and it's really concentrated. So the CPM's for that are going to be 50 a hundred plus dollars. The only other place that buyers are going to be able to get sound on video besides that and at any sort of reasonable price. Is going to be this interstitial here. And so today that maybe is mostly absent games, but in a few months you're going to start to see that in these premium publishers. And so today if you were to run an ad here, the CPM would probably be 3 or 4 or $5 fairly cheap for what it is. But what you're going to see for publishers is that in a year or so that CPM could be $20 easily because it's all relative to those different amounts and for buyers rather than. Paying another $50 or more for an instream impression. If they can get that interstitial, which is pretty much just as much attention and value in this premium environment, they would be happy to buy it at 20 or even more. And so this doesn't work for everyone. This is just a list of publishers that have unique, premium, valuable media content that frankly, a lot of users are willing, first of all, to subscribe and pay for, but not everyone is. But they would be willing to give up their data, give up their time and attention to get that content. You're just looking for a Turkey chili recipe. No one is going to watch a 32nd ad in order to get that because it's a frankly commodity. But if you have something unique and. Valuable people will stay, people will watch. There are a couple of companies that are working on this today or working on the edges of this. I'm excited to see some of them develop. I have more confidence in some of their strategies than others or their ability to do it. I do hope to see more of them really focus on this. I assume most don't understand that the CPM's are going to really explode through the roof in the next year or so. And so I think it's a huge opportunity and there's probably others that are going to get into the space as well. And then last point here is sort of what to do about it. So ultimately we need sort of this balance across the the three entities that make up the ad supported web. So for publishers and anyone that's sort of supports them on the sell side, if you have that unique and valuable content, it's time to start experimenting. If you have subscriptions, if you're sort of offering a paywall, if you're just trying to monetize with ads, now is an opportunity to try to introduce these dynamic paywalls, try different messaging and content and see what happens. See if someone says, yeah, I'm happy to watch this ad. Not everyone will, but if you get 50% of the users to watch an ad in order to unlock the content that they were trying to get to, that's really meaningful today. Minorly meaningful at the three or four or $5 CPM's, but if that's $20.00 in a year from now, that's really impressive and and valuable to your bottom line. Advertisers and your partners, most importantly, stop buying photostream. There's a lot of, you know, fake stream out there. It's really easy to identify. Is it in stream and has the sound on that is fake. Are you paying in stream prices for it? Stop doing that right away. Start looking at different attention and quality measures to really understand what the value is, not just of these different video placements, but placements overall. It's going to be really important, especially as you look at different objectives and creatives and things like that and then start expanding. We are targeting to interstitial something you've probably avoided doing for a long time because you think of it as sort of just absent games. It's not just that. And so find those opportunities to understand, hey, there's a lot of engaged users, premium sort of media brands, brand safe, etc, where you can get that high attention value correlation to outcomes that are really, really good price. And then for users, for you like the internets, not free, it never has been free and we need to accept that. And so that content that you want, somebody has to pay money to create. Be ready to pay for it. It's going to be with your money, with your time or with your data. And the sooner we sort of acknowledge that, the sooner that all three of these sort of entities move in this direction, I think we're going to see a healthier industry and media landscape and a better world for all. So that's it. Thank you all. Hope this was interesting and looking forward to seeing this innovation continue.
Eric SeufertPaul Bannister on your recent podcast together, you lamented about local news not having a sustainable business or ad model.
I believe there is one and this is it. We simply need to change users' fundamental belief that the Internet is free, and while that may seem like a daunting task, it need not be, and I believe the financial incentives for publishers and advertisers are perfectly aligned to lead to this inevitable (perhaps imminent) innovation.
I really enjoyed this - thanks for sharing (know its not a small feat to categorise thoughts so eloquently).
I'm bullish on alternative measurement models that better reward contribution to an advertisers goals than what exists today (telling that Google & FB are open sourcing MMM models) - this side of the industry is crazy exciting.
However, there will always be someone selling what a last-click CPA advertiser wants (65% of advertisers use last-click as primary digital kpi according to magic numbers) - such as MFA - and if an ad impression is 5x more expensive then it needs to convert 5x harder which it rarely will (particularly on a scaled media campaign with multiple channels & sophisticated search program), so its tough to compete vs that.
Appreciate tech is getting more responsible & govt inputting more and more which changes the landscape, but I think those two forces just drive more into search & social as opposed to encouraging programmatic to be done properly.
Easy often wins but hopefully easy becomes more accurate holistically and at scale, then it'll reward actors more accurately.
Agree with your general direction, though I'd say we've been dancing on the precipice for an astoundingly long time and have finally been pushed to an overdue tipping-point by a combination of platform and regulatory interventions.
"... all media will be valued according to its richness on 2 dimensions - what is known about the audience that consumes that media, and the likelihood of attention the media/placements will capture."
It may be implicit in these 2, but I would specifically call out measurability.
Brilliant analysis, Erez! Thank you. The uncertainty here is between the potential opportunity and the ability, enablement, and will of those involved to catch it. For quality media owners, your quadrant makes absolute sense, but it will only work if the forces in the field (i.e., the media companies themselves) will recognise their potential, turn it into an objective, and develop a strategy to achieve it. If we were cynical, using past data, quality media owners will probably try to appear in all 4 areas of your diagram's supply vs. demand, which doesn't make any sense - just as their current approaches make no sense when making their inventory available in quality environments while simultaneously selling it in the programmatic marketplace. Successful media monetisation strategies in 2025 will have to rely on the concepts of exclusivity and scarcity. It's about who blinks first, and so far, media owners have always blinked first, leaving plenty of opportunities on the table. This affects the overall dynamics and every other category involved. I couldn't agree more on the concept of educating the audience about the value of the content they access, but then again, it must be part of a strategy, not a tactic.
AdTech enthusiast & Local Media supporter, looking for my next role. Generalist / Problem Solver experienced in Biz Dev, Product/Project Management, Product Ops, Product Marketing, & Salesforce Admin. Dad x2.
Couldn't agree more- the current implicit value exchange is going to turn into an explicit one where consumers can choose their own path. I did an informal poll that showed the majority of people are willing to watch a short ad in exchange for access to content. I see this as a very popular option, especially for both consumers and publishers, when you factor in the coming supply crunch for high quality, sound on video placements that you talked about in the video!
Erez Levin Agreed that value based media & quality is a strong alternative for buyers who put in the work to identify those opportunities and transact in a more responsible way. I just worry about cpm inflation from a supply crunch across quality formats leading to poorer cost-per contribution to business outcomes relative to historical baselines & other channels... I'd expect spend to be harder to justify to non-media decision makers and budgets become substantially disrupted.
Exciting times ahead - Excellent thought provoking content!!
Brilliant, deep analysis by Erez Levin on what to expect in 2025.
The uncertainty here, in my opinion, is between the potential opportunity and the ability, enablement, and will of those involved to catch it.
For quality media owners, the quadrant showing the relationship between supply and demand makes absolute sense, but it will only work if the forces in the field (i.e., the media companies themselves) will recognise their potential, turn it into an objective, and develop a strategy to achieve it.
If we were cynical, using past data, premium media owners will probably try to appear in all 4 areas of that diagram, which doesn't make any sense - just as their current approaches make no sense when making their inventory available in quality environments while simultaneously selling it in the programmatic marketplace.
Successful media monetisation strategies in 2025 will have to rely on the concepts of exclusivity and scarcity.
It's about who blinks first, and so far, media owners have always blinked first, leaving plenty of opportunities on the table. This affects the overall dynamics and every other category involved.
I couldn't agree more on the concept of educating the audience about the value of the content they access, but then again, it must be part of a strategy, not a tactic. Reacting at the last moment, with no alternatives left (i.e., 'Consent or Pay'), is a remedy worse than the problem itself.
#advertising#privacy#data#audience#media#adtech#content#publishers#monetisation#programmatic#strategy#userexperience#cookieless#idless#identityresolution#marketing#firstpartydata
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐃 𝐀𝐆𝐄 (𝐌𝐲 2025 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧)
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘥. 𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘓𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘖𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘵.
The ad industry is at a precipice, and is imminently going to tip into entirely new territory, and no, it's not going to be caused by AI (at least not primarily).
The dual illusions underpinning our industry - 1. that there is an infinite supply of quality media and 2. that marketing effectiveness can be measured with precise, deterministic attribution - will soon be confronting reality that neither of these are nor have ever been true.
With these changes will emerge a familiar but revolutionary innovation that will save the internet, journalism, and democracy.
I’ve laid out the full narrative here and in the links below along with a brief summary, that explains why these changes are inevitable, how they will affect consumers, publishers, and advertisers, and why this will create a healthy media ecosystem and ad industry.
1. 𝐀 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐂𝐫𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 - For the first time in over a decade, we will experience supply scarcity according to how marketers assign value to media ("addressable impressions" and "In-stream" aka premium video).
2. 𝐀𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞 - Instead of the commoditization we’ve seen built off of universal (and typically incorrect) identifiers, all media will be valued according to its richness on 2 dimensions - what is known about the audience that consumes that media, and the likelihood of attention the media/placements will capture.
3. 𝐀𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭, 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐫-𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐔𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐬 & 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 - All premium/valuable/unique content will be placed behind a gate that users can unlock with their money, data, or time/attention. Advertisers will play a crucial role here and be part of that fair-value exchange.
For those that want to see the full narrative of what that will look like, watch the recording of me walking through the preso here or check out the full pitch deck or Loom recording linked in the comments.
There are many nuances here, some of which I surely did not explicitly address above, and I welcome all questions and feedback which I'll gladly respond to.
More than anything, I encourage everybody in this space to heed this message, to consider the probability that my assertions are correct (more than 0%, less than 100%), and prepare your businesses accordingly. If I can help provide guidance on how you can get there (pro bono unless you have really deep pockets), feel free to reach out.
# Only put off until tomorrow what you are willing to die having left undone
## Don't miss out on the future of local content and advertising!
💡 Lee Enterprises and ProRata.ai join forces to revolutionize local media through AI-driven solutions. 🚀
Lee Enterprises, Inc., a prominent provider of local journalism, has announced an extraordinary content partnership with AI innovator ProRata.ai. Together, they aim to revolutionize local media by offering hyper-personalized content and cutting-edge real-time advertising solutions.
This groundbreaking collaboration harnesses the power of artificial intelligence to enhance the way we consume local news and engage with advertisements. With hyper-personalization, you can look forward to content that is tailored to your specific interests and preferences, creating a truly immersive media experience.
By leveraging advanced real-time advertising solutions, businesses can reach their target audience more effectively than ever before. The partnership between Lee Enterprises and ProRata.ai marks a significant step forward in the evolution of local media, ensuring that advertisers can deliver their messages in a way that resonates with consumers.
Don't let the Fear of Missing Out hold you back! Take action now to stay ahead in the realm of local content and advertising. Invest in your Health Savings Account \(HSA\) to secure a brighter future for yourself and your loved ones. #hsa#investing#healthcare#health#family#wellness 💪💰
Remember, the key to success is staying informed and adapting to new opportunities. Embrace the power of AI-driven solutions and unlock the potential of enhanced local media. Act now and seize the future!
I was asked by a couple of colleagues to write my takeaways on this week's Mediaspace.global 2024 Summit.
There is one.
Every single issue related to the topics discussed—advertising, monetisation, AI, sustainability—could be solved, some of them partially, others almost entirely, by the following:
1) Stopping "looking at the world" through the lens of the programmatic open marketplace, which is part of the past and should not be considered anymore as a reputable and effective environment to advertise on. It can be salvaged but in parallel, and it is not an environment for premium media brands and advertisers.
2) Quality media companies collaborating in different areas.
The two combined approaches would:
- Boost media monetisation.
- Maximise the effectiveness of advertisers' budgets.
- Increase media asset control.
- Improve user privacy and experience.
- Provide a combined front in negotiating with a stronger voice and from a category standpoint with AI platforms.
- Slash carbon emissions through simple, rational, strategic choices, rather than needing complex assessments and waste of resources, that could then be focused on fine-tuning the approach on the reputable part of the industry instead.
Ultimately, starve of oxygen that parasitic part of the industry that is slowing all the rest down.
The solution is hiding in plain sight, yet many are still hostage to an archaic vision, identifying digital advertising and media monetisation with the programmatic open marketplace, and seem unable to break free.
I am sharing in the comments some articles I wrote on the need for a radical change of perspective.
Kinga InczeCornelia ReitingerCecilia DonesStephen DnesMichael Charles BorrelliThomas HöppnerIdit AradYagub RahimovZineb Serroukh-OuardaMark HeapTim CowenTadeusz ZorawskiMaria SantacaterinaSam MatharuEvelyn Pau-BrindleDilip ShuklaDavid SarlosAgnieszka KrukowskaJason DownieEvgeny PopovCourtney Radsch, PhDSarah ThompsonJames RosewellHarvin GuptaRichard Kramer#media#advertising#programmatic#monetisation#publishers#news#newsmedia#data#ai#sustainability#adtech#audience#privacy#intellectualproperty#copyright
Shhh...don't tell them we told you!
Every ad agency is different, so this doesn't apply to all, however there are some that we feel don't act in the best interest of the client.
First: Hourly agencies could overcharge you and without evidence that it took as long as they claim. Make sure you are asking how they monitor their time and that your agreement only allows to the agreed upon hours.
Second: Creative. It is vital that you have creative content that the algorithm favors. With the popularity of AI tools thr algorithms favor human content because it is original, at the same time they want content that is relatable and authentic. Your creative budget should be 10% of your media, as a best practice.
Third: Transparency. We have seen so many agencies not share access to ad management or even analytics platforms. Make sure you have admin access.
We know this may make some agencies mad because we're spilling their secrets but we're Media Rebel for a reason and leading the digital rebellion starts with integrity and holding them accountable so you don't get taken advantage of.
Contact us if you are interested in joining the digital rebellion!
#digitalagency#digitaladagency#digitalstrategy
Check out this weeks Wrapper Newsletter 📰 🗞️
Here's a glimpse of what you can discover...
1️⃣ Did Dotdash Meredith Crack the Code on Profitable Journalism? - Discover how their innovative ad-tech solution, D/Cipher, is making waves, as explained by their Chief Innovation Officer, John Roberts, at AdMonsters Publisher Forum Coronado.
2️⃣ More Pubs Turning to OpenAI’s Preferred Publisher Program - Learn about OpenAI's Preferred Publisher Program and how giants like Axel Springer, The Financial Times, and Dotdash Meredith are harnessing AI to reshape content creation.
3️⃣ Strategic Shifts at Warner Bros. Discovery - After a challenging Q1, Warner Bros. Discovery is not just bouncing back but redefining its strategy through exciting new partnerships.
4️⃣ TikTok's Legal Battle - With its lawsuit against the US government, TikTok takes a stand to influence how digital platforms are regulated. Discover the implications for privacy and content management as the platform fights to remain a staple for Gen Z and millennials.
Read the full newsletter today 👉 https://bit.ly/4dTvXo3
We all know that publishers are navigating any number of boundaries. But the struggle can also create bridges. Here's how.
Whether it’s getting rid of cookies, generative AI partnerships, or evolving relationships with platforms, recent developments highlight why publishers have to focus on their greatest assets.
For publishers, these assets are their content, the audiences it reaches, and the attention it garners.
Our models help publishers by scaling their capacity to direct the right content to the right audience. We have a few different products that make this possible:
🔎 𝐃𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐬: Gain insights into which articles drive the most engagement and recurring revenue.
👫 𝐀𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: Understand who should see your content to maximize impact and revenue potential.
💹 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Identify new opportunities to diversify and strengthen revenue streams beyond traditional advertising.
💰 𝐌𝐅𝐀 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Show which domains are likely MFA – and how your domain is differentiated from these wasteful sites.
📺 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲: Remove crude blocklist targeting by showing that keywords and SEO shouldn't determine the brand safety, or suitability, of a story.
By leveraging Overtone's analytics, publishers can make informed decisions, ensure best-in-class collaborations, and build a future in which they have a stronger say, all while continuing to deliver high-quality journalism.
Let's work together to turn these obstacles into opportunities and build a sustainable future for digital journalism.
#ContextualAnalytics#DigitalAdvertising#AdTech#Publishing
This is a great example of how a publisher can use Hum to gain a better understanding of its content and therefore its audience, and then connect eager advertisers to that previously hidden audience. Audience wins. Advertisers win. Publisher wins!
Us Weekly's secret weapon? Artificial intelligence that reads celebrity gossip better than humans do.
a360media partnered with Hum to dynamically categorize Us Weekly's archive, tapping into the hidden topic connections using AI-powered content analysis. Check out how they're unlocking new ad categories, surfacing new ad inventory, and boosting programmatic ad revenue with Hum! https://lnkd.in/eNbj8_SA
"Too bad for the agencies, too bad for the creatives who don't admit this revolution. They are destined to disappear." This statement shocked some during my intervention at the African Cristal Festival, at Justin Thomas-Copeland conference "The Creative Industry & the Creator Community." And so?
#Ai : Your intervention at the advertising event definitely stirred things up, especially with your bold statement: "Too bad for the agencies, too bad for the creatives who don't embrace this revolution. They are destined to disappear." This line perfectly highlighted the growing divide between traditional agency creatives and digital content creators. The digital world has completely transformed advertising dynamics, drawing attention that some traditional agencies are struggling to capture. Those who don’t adapt to these new formats and channels risk becoming irrelevant. By addressing this issue head-on, you likely opened many eyes to an undeniable truth: the advertising landscape is undergoing a major transformation, and standing still is no longer an option.
You also brought a refreshing perspective on this revolution by stating: "What’s happening on the web with content creators is simply amazing. They’re incredibly creative, and I find it inspiring. For me, it's an opportunity to break free from the routine and traditional ways of doing my job as a creative. This new era pushes me to constantly evolve, experiment, and stay ahead. Rather than seeing this revolution as a threat, I view it as a chance to avoid getting stuck in a comfort zone."
This open-mindedness toward content creators highlights your proactive and forward-thinking approach. Instead of clinging to traditional methods, you see this digital shift as an opportunity to push the boundaries of creativity and blend the strengths of both worlds. It shows that those who can merge the strategic depth of traditional agencies with the boldness and speed of the digital world will create the most innovative and impactful campaigns of tomorrow.
Thank you, mehdi El AljJustin Thomas-Copeland for these insightful and thoughtful exchanges
#Campaign#Creator#Creativity#Marketing#Advertising#Ads#Inspiration#Talk#Morocco#Old#Fromthearchives#Creativedirection#Creativeadvertising#AI#DigitalAdvertising#MarketingInnovation#FutureOfAdvertising#tvad#tvadvertising#RetroAdvertising#EmotionalConnectionShem's Publicité#AnInsightfulTalkwithAIonmywork by Youssef EL JIRARI
At an annual innovation award ceremony, Meinolf Ellers noticed a disconnect: while newspapers were winning awards for digital innovation, real transformation remained elusive. Print subscriptions continued declining, and digital advertising revenue wasn't sufficient to sustain newsrooms.
◾ This realisation led to the creation of the Digital Revenue Initiative (DRIVE) in 2020, spearheaded by dpa Deutsche Presse-Agentur GmbH, Germany's largest news agency. DRIVE helps regional publishers pool their data to find joint solutions using AI and analytics to gain more subscribers.
◾ The initiative currently serves 30 publishers across Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, charging €4,500 monthly for data analytics – equivalent to one data analyst's salary but offering broader insights and peer learning opportunities.
◾ DRIVE's success stems from two key factors: publishers' trust in dpa and their recognition that digital transformation through AI and analytics was difficult to achieve alone. The initiative faced minimal resistance because dpa could bring different publishers to common ground, neutralising competition among participants.
◾ One crucial insight was shifting the focus from quantity to quality media time. "The key problem of digital transformation in newspapers is culture. Many people still have print DNA," notes Ellers. DRIVE's data showed that readers who spent more time with content were more likely to purchase subscriptions.
◾ This approach has proven successful globally – The Guardian and Le Monde increased subscribers despite reducing content volume by one-third and one-fourth respectively. The New York Times reached its 10-million subscriber goal ahead of schedule by focusing on reader-preferred content.
◾ DRIVE implemented Dmitry Shishkin's User Needs model, originally developed at the BBC, to help newsrooms deliver more value. The initiative developed algorithms to help editors identify these needs and trained them to analyse data effectively.
◾ The strategy helps eliminate "ghost articles" – content that consumes resources but generates negligible reader engagement or subscriptions. The Post and Courier demonstrated this approach's effectiveness, gaining 250% more digital subscribers after reducing daily output from 50-65 articles to 30 in-depth pieces.
◾ For regional media houses, survival depends on modernising the user experience. As Ellers states, "Our only chance to survive is to bring to local journalism a user experience that is as cool and convenient as the user experience of Spotify and TikTok."
📍 Find more insights in the full article by Priyal S. 👉 https://lnkd.in/d9Qg84KD
With a focus on Customer Data Platforms, I help publishers and other businesses optimize their marketing, technology, operations and fulfillment functions. If you have a technology problem, contact me.
On TheRebooting, Brian Morrissey makes a distinction between packaged media and networked media that sounds a lot of like curated vs. non-curated. Packaged media has a narrative, a voice, and an audience in mind. It's constructed. Networked media is 4chan and X and Threads and so on. It's more interactive and chaotic.
What scares publishers (or should scare them) is the idea that AI might become the curator, leaving no room for legacy packaging.
https://lnkd.in/eaNkC6dy
Eric Seufert Paul Bannister on your recent podcast together, you lamented about local news not having a sustainable business or ad model. I believe there is one and this is it. We simply need to change users' fundamental belief that the Internet is free, and while that may seem like a daunting task, it need not be, and I believe the financial incentives for publishers and advertisers are perfectly aligned to lead to this inevitable (perhaps imminent) innovation.