Emma Richardson’s Post

View profile for Emma Richardson, graphic

Director People & Development

Whitehall should leave apprentices alone - my thoughts on the article from The Lawyer today Cripps like many law firms, offer a #LegalApprenticeship programme, open to all, though many join from school at 18/19 years of age. This is a six year programme, (gaining a #Paralegal qualification along the way and the option to pause after two years). This pathway offers preserved study time (one day) at one of the specialist law colleges and on the job training and working (four days) as part of an embedded legal team on six or twelve month rotations. At the end of the six-year period, subject to passing all the relevant exams you have a law degree and have completed your training to be a qualified solicitor. But here is the real difference between this and the more traditional route of university, SQE, and training contract, as an Apprentice you start your career with no tuition / university debt, as you have been earning along the way. At #Cripps we have our first cohort qualifying in 2025, in early November 2024 we were delighted to congratulate them on stunning law degree results 1sts or 2.1s. Now the small matter of passing their SQE 1&2! This career pathway to becoming a qualified lawyer levels the playing field for those who simply cannot afford to go to university or perhaps have no network to rely upon. This widens the diversity of those who qualify to more accurately reflect the changing demographic of the clients they work with . Ask anyone at Cripps - they love having the Apprentices working on their matters. Their energy, enthusiasm, knowledge of the firm, ability to absorb skills and technical information and sheer determination is why teams clamour to work with them. "Law firms have lapped it up; more than 2,000 new solicitor apprenticeships have begun work since 2022. Now, however, Whitehall cuts are threatening to put the brakes on". "The Government proposes to remove some Level 7 apprenticeships from the scope of levy funding". While the levy helps, firms provide additional training and support, (it truly does take a village), which easily exceeds the levy funded part of the training. Removing the levy, will dramatically impact the social mobility improvements that the law sector has started to make. Many firms, particularly those that are smaller will simply abandon Apprenticeships, and the sector will revert to being only for those who can afford it. What a travesty! As The Lawyer summarised - "It is short-sighted for the apprenticeships levy to be on the cuts list, and it will do little to boost Treasury coffers in the long-term. This is one Government policy that should fade away, else risk the wrath of the profession that wants to break down its own barriers".

Fiona Chamberlain

Emerging Talent Manager (Operations) at Cripps LLP

1mo

This is such an important issue for law firms and social mobility right now. Thank you for supporting our apprentices, advocating for the apprenticeship and bringing this to everyone’s attention. Hopefully Skills for England will listen to the industry that knows best.

Tara Payne

Probate Manager (Senior Associate) ACILEX at Cripps

3w

I agree wholeheartedly! I couldn’t do my job without their help and I enjoy helping them to reach their goals.

Sam Chilton

Helping Managers and internal recruiters secure the best legal PA talent across the UK and Internationally | Recruit and retain with SUCCESS | Director @ SC Staff and Consult | Trustee, Co-Founder

1mo

Completely agree Emma Richardson and I do hope Whitehall pay attention to the lawyers summary. Even better they could get early careers professionals from the industries they are looking to withdraw finding for apprenticeships involved! Maybe the discussions will never get off the ground as they'll be plenty of evidence to support the need for more funding not less!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics