Elion’s Post

View organization page for Elion, graphic

2,679 followers

Price transparency is a fascinating category that's undergone some significant changes over the past few years as a result of regulatory changes. In 2021, CMS stepped in to require both hospitals and payers to publish “machine-readable files” (MRFs) that contain charges, charge descriptions, and rates for insured and self-pay patients across a wide range of service codes. In response to the influx of hospital- and payer-provided MRFs, a number of companies, including Mathematica, Payerset, Serif Health, SumHealth, Trek Health, TALON, Turquoise Health, and Visible Charges, LLC, prepared to ingest this data and actually make it legible across a range of use cases. The differentiation between price transparency vendors initially came down to the quality of data, and vendors built robust pipelines using heuristics and data science to filter out irrelevant data. But vendors are aware that more competitors could drive down prices for high-quality data and are focused on moving downstream to build products and services incorporating price data for useful applications. To succeed in this space, vendors need to marry data quality with the requisite tooling for contract negotiations. But it seems the real winners here will ultimately be providers and payers, who stand to benefit from streamlined processes and less reliance on contracting consultants. We've covered this in more detail in this week's market map: https://lnkd.in/eVXX7Rpy

  • graphical user interface, application
Emraan Khan

SVP Head of Commercial @ Uno Health | ex-Humana | ex-BCG

3mo

Great primer. Wonder how many years we're from a vendor + payer partnership cracking the code on a reliable cost estimator tool for patients?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics