I am enormously honoured to have won this year’s Hunter Prize from The Hub Canada. An enormous thanks to Sean Speer and Rudyard Griffiths for their vision in creating The Hub, and to the Hunter Family Foundation for their support of this valuable initiative. I cannot wait to see next year’s challenge and the innovative solutions that others bring to it. Many thanks to the esteemed panel of judges Jennifer Keesmaat, Amanda Lang, Mike Moffatt, PhD, Ben Rabidoux, and Evan Siddall for selecting my proposal as the winner.
The main reason I won is by following the path laid out before me. I owe a particular debt to Michael Fenn, whose work I lovingly ripped off as the core foundation of what a federal government can do to affordably supercharge housing-enabling infrastructure investment. Many thanks to all of the others out there who have helped me on this journey.
At its core, my proposal has a simple narrative: we can get more of the infrastructure we need to build homes by cutting taxes and reducing our reliance on taxpayers to finance infrastructure. We need to stop asking taxpayers (regardless of level of government) to pay the full cost of infrastructure upfront, and get cities to take out debt or use private investors to finance user-pay infrastructure. Water, wastewater, electricity, and natural gas are all fundamentally the same business, just delivering different commodities. Rethinking how we approach financing the growth we need in these areas can both improve housing affordability and build the right kind of infrastructure we need as part of the energy transition.
Congratulations to Benjamin Dachis on winning the Hunter Prize from The Hub Canada!
Benjamin Dachis proposed a transformative idea for Canada’s housing crisis: we should finance critical infrastructure through long-term debt (not high development charges) to lower housing costs.
Canadian cities often fund water, roads, and sewage systems through high development charges. But the fees disproportionately affect those seeking to buy homes, he says. In the GTA, for example, development charges for water and wastewater alone can exceed $55,000 per home.
Financing infrastructure through long-term debt allows cities to reduce upfront costs on homebuyers. “As we work to build the millions of homes needed to restore affordability, we must adopt a model that allows for equitable sharing of infrastructure costs,” Dachis writes.
This approach also supports Canada’s energy transition. With city-backed financing, developers could more easily adopt low-carbon technologies like heat pumps, lowering both environmental and economic costs for future homeowners.
Dachis calls for policy reforms that empower cities to finance infrastructure sustainably, supporting affordable, resilient, and low-carbon communities across Canada.
Congratulations!
🔗 Read more:
https://lnkd.in/g9qkTEj4
Hunter Prize: Want to lower both housing costs and emissions? It's time to embrace utility financing of infrastructure - The Hub
https://thehub.ca
I Help Trade & Construction Founders Generate More Attention & Projects With Content & Outreach → $610K+ / 1.7M+ Views Generated For Clients.
2moBuilding homes without proper infrastructure feels like setting the stage without a backdrop—kinda incomplete. What's your take on funding solutions?