EDministrate P/L’s Post

In VET in Australia it is important to have well-structured and effective training programs that align with industry standards and regulations and meet the needs and expectations of learners.

Looking at my feed on Linkedin, each day I see there are lots of companies offering JESIP training, or training that incorporates JESIP models and principles. What I can't understand is why some providers feel the need to change the names of the JESIP models or come up with abbreviations where they don't already exist or aren't agreed? I came across the following picture the other day (apologies for the quality but it's a screenshot). JESIP is about standards and in this particular case there are 2 issues arising: 1. The model in the picture are the Decision Controls not the Joint Decision Controls Process as it says at the top of the image; 2. The Decision Controls are not abbreviated, although the image shows JDC. For JESIP to be truly successful it is imperative that those providing training either in the public or private sectors keep the models and titles as they are presented in the Joint Doctrine, this is the only way we can maintain the standard and when your training content is scrutinised, for example during a public inquiry (as happened during the Manchester Arena Inquiry), you will be inline with the joint Doctrine, not at odds with it!

Corporate Training and Assessment Brochure. Powered by Cambridge English #CorporateTraining #Assessment #CambridgeEnglish

Ensuring that your VET practitioners are knowledgeable and skilled in their field is crucial for delivering high-quality training and assessment.

Ensuring that your VET practitioners are knowledgeable and skilled in their field is crucial for delivering high-quality training and assessment.

Get ahead of the game and understand about the changes coming with NET ZERO.

We get asked quite regularly about the regulatory requirements of refresher training and training for MHE that doesn't require a HRW licence. Below is a great simple breakdown to help you navigate that process.

Quick analysis of DSL training evaluations from this term shows that 100% of delegates rated the training as good or better and 96% scored it excellent. Additionally 100% of delegates indicated they would recommend this training. Happy to know that staff feel the training is useful

The GMC national training survey makes interesting reading: with 86% of trainees satisfied with their role showing that the quality of training remains high. However nearly a quarter of trainees are at risk of burnout and half of trainers by the Copenhagen criteria. I think this represents the important role of advocacy for each other and looking out for those around you.

A person who considers themselves a "personal defender" should ideally spend a significant amount of time on formal training. The exact number of hours can vary depending on individual goals and circumstances, but it is generally recommended to dedicate a substantial portion of one's time towards training. This ensures that the "personal defender" is well-prepared, knowledgeable, and equipped to handle various situations that may arise. Regular training helps to maintain and improve skills, stay updated with the latest techniques and practices, and build confidence in one's abilities. Ultimately, the more time and effort invested in formal training, the more effective and competent a "personal defender" can become. #Staysharp