The listing projected a 28.1% IRR. Now, investors are trying to recoup roughly $50,000,000 of misappropriated funds. If you’ve been following the Nightingale Properties x CrowdStreet fiasco, it’s been quite a story. If you haven’t, give it a Google, because it’s more than we can break down here. But even looking at the CliffsNotes provides a valuable lesson for investors. -> Nightingale Properties was raising funds to acquire two properties in Atlanta and Miami. -> They projected a 28.1% IRR for investors in the deal. -> They raised more than $60 million from investors. -> Nightingale never bought the properties they raised the capital for. -> Instead Nightingale’s CEO is alleged to have misappropriated roughly $50M of investor funds on things like personal expenses, stock options, and funneling it to other properties. It’s crazy. But here’s the takeaway for you: Don’t let dollar signs get in the way of due diligence. The deal was projecting a 28.1% IRR. I’m sure a lot of investors thought, “28%? Sign me up. I’ll put $100K in.” And just like that … It’s gone. As an investor, you need to remember that every deal has risk. And generally speaking, the higher the projected returns, the more risk is in the deal. This is obviously a unique circumstance and it’s making headlines for a reason, but every investor should use it as a learning experience. Be skeptical. Do your homework. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Has anyone else been following this story? -- If you're looking for guidance on doing due diligence as a passive investor, we have some free resources here that can help: https://lnkd.in/gw_3x8QB
If this isn't a lesson that You should do due diligence before Lletting your greed take over, I don't know what is Drew Breneman
Great insights, everything has it’s own risks, facing them is the only way forward.
The allure of high returns can sometimes cloud judgment, but as you rightly pointed out, every deal carries its own level of risk.
Good lesson for other LPs. Just because a crowdsourced site is posting the deal, it doesn't mean they're doing adequate due diligence on it for you
Yes, we've been following and learning from it. It's a crazy story and has driven many investors our way because vetting sponsors is WAY MORE important than the deals themselves (how they problem solve, how transparent are they, can you trust them?)
It's a stark reminder of the importance of thorough due diligence before investing, great insights.
I went down the rabbit hole on this story not too long ago. It's absolutely bonkers. "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is."
Building a network and community of trusted individuals is key to ensuring this won't happen. Drew Breneman And if it does, they will be there to put you back on the right track.
Crazy story Drew Breneman
Start your CRE investment business now 🔷 Multifamily and hotel owner since 2011 🔷 Training CRE Pros to launch their own business since 2016 🔷 Helping you invest passively in multifamily and hotel assets.
7moToo many LPs make projected IRR the only thing they look at, and they never look under the hood at all.