I recently watched the Child First Self-Assessment Toolkit launched by the Youth Justice Board. It is worth watching and undertaking the self-assessment. The Youth Justice Board should be celebrated for its commitment to improving engagement and outcomes for children and young people. The four tenets of the Child First approach align with the philosophy of social inclusion and diversion from the justice system. However, discussions around a Child First approach through a youth justice lens also provide an opportunity to reflect on England's and Wales’s approach to children and young people and justice. It invites us to recognise that England's and Wales's criminal age of responsibility poses significant limitations to implementing Child First to youth justice. The age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is ten, one of the lowest compared to other democratic nations globally. The low age of criminal responsibility also contrasts with research findings on adolescent development (see Steinberg, 2009). Furthermore, the punitive approach adopted contrasts with the UN's recommendation, which advocates for an age no lower than fourteen. Therefore, while England and Wales remain a global outlier regarding the minimum age of criminal responsibility and continue to oppose research and the UN's recommendations, it raises the question of whether we can honestly accept that our approach to youth justice places the child first. (Link to the launch of the Child First Self-Assessment Toolkit https://lnkd.in/g98ckndy ) Please DM me for a PDF version of Steinberg (2009). #YouthJustice #ChildFirstApproach #YouthDevelopment
Fabulous post Nick - point well made!
CEO at Abianda
2moHere here Dr Nicholas Marsh! Endlessly baffling that the age of CR is at odds with a safeguarding response to young people's involvement in offending/CJS. Alliance for Youth Justice (AYJ) are doing some super interesting work on young people and criminal justice.