𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙎𝙈𝙄𝘾 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙃𝙪𝙖𝙬𝙚𝙞 𝘿𝙚𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙐𝙎 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝘼𝙙𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖'𝙨 𝙏𝙚𝙘𝙝 𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙤𝙧
Despite stringent US sanctions aimed at restricting China’s access to advanced technology, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) and Huawei have made significant strides that challenge the effectiveness of these restrictions.
The sanctions sought to limit China’s access to cutting-edge chip manufacturing and critical 5G technology, aiming to stifle Huawei’s and SMIC’s competitive abilities on a global scale.
However, Huawei’s launch of the Mate 60 Pro, equipped with a highly advanced 7nm chip reportedly produced by SMIC, demonstrated that both companies have found ways to circumvent some of these limitations.
SMIC, China's leading semiconductor manufacturer, has been critical in enabling Huawei to move forward with advanced chip production. Although SMIC itself is limited by restrictions on acquiring certain equipment for 7nm and below processes, it has managed to adapt existing technologies to produce more sophisticated chips than expected.
This breakthrough highlights the company's capability to innovate within restricted parameters, enabling domestic alternatives to emerge in China’s semiconductor industry despite US controls.
Huawei’s recent achievements also underscore its ability to innovate independently. The Mate 60 Pro not only signals a technical milestone but also symbolizes a significant step toward technological self-reliance.
Huawei’s persistent R&D investments and ability to develop proprietary technologies have strengthened its position, helping the company and China’s tech industry remain competitive on the global stage despite the sanctions.
___________________________________________________
𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚄𝚂 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐-𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖 𝚎𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚢 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜.
___________________________________________________
📝 𝘠𝘰𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢 𝘈𝘪
.
Semiconductor Capital Equipment Professional
7moThis is an interesting post. I can't determine if any of the spike is due to exports. And if that is the case, then the spike in legacy chips is to support domestic Chinese consumption. This should not be shocking, leading edge conversation aside, because China has such a large domestic market for consumer products that need these legacy chips. This production spike seems like a bit of a non-event?