Along with the other 99.9% of people and brands in the marketing-advertising industry not represented at the event, the Cannes festival passed me by last week. Which is a shame, as I didn’t even get round to designing my annual t-shirt. So, it's a bit of an afterthought this year. Not my best work by some distance, a bit cliched and derivative, to be honest.
However, this entry does give me a chance to reflect on my milestone 27th consecutive year not attending the festival. Which, given the number of categories and winners this year, you would think would be worthy of a metallic lion-shaped prize of some kind.
While I have nothing against these or any other awards, what has bugged me for a number of years is how agency groups can spend millions of dollars on an elite party and entertainment schedule, go home with paid-for awards of various descriptions, making sure they have bought enough replica statues to display in global offices that had precisely nothing to do with the ‘winning work’, and then go back to HQ to issue directives to their regions and markets as to how many people they need cut in order to balance costs and deliver annual synergy targets.
I never bought into the trickle down economics of these events. In my experience it is an event for the few, paid for by the many.
Nothing ever trickled down to the people or the clients in most markets. No benefits, no rewards, no investment, just costs and redundancies, because those flights, hotel rooms, parties and award entries don't fund themselves.
Of course this is just my experience, other experiences are equally valid, I am sure.
Happy Monday.
Peace ✌
Passionate about data-driven strategy, with 15+ years experience working to understand and unlock businesses full potential
6moLove this