Is quality content recirculation the antidote to rubbish content recommendation? If third parties are willing to pay good money for media companies to support the bubble/lifecycle of low-quality content, what would be the value of a business recirculating quality content? What if that recirculation business was owned and managed by premium media brands? What would it take for them to focus on maximising each other’s quality propositions, strengthening the category and themselves? Can it be a solution built on top of the core relationships existing in quality media alliances and premium advertising environments? I have just published a newsletter issue on the topic. Link in the comment below. #media #advertising #marketing #audience #data #userexperience #cookieless #thirdpartycookie #privacy #publishers #content #strategy #subscriptions #adtech #monetisation #contextual #brandsuitability #brandreputation #engagement
Quality content recirculation can combat poor recommendations. It enhances brand value and fosters collaboration for stronger propositions. Expanding on existing relationships within media alliances could pave the way for a solution in this environment. Can't wait to check out your newsletter issue Alessandro De Zanche
depends. let's bring back the web-rings and pub alliances, and not allow apple news to skim from "the top" and deem less-volumed pubs not worthy enough. diversity of voices will suffer.
Independent consultant - Senior advisor - Audience, advertising, media monetisation strategist
7mohttps://www.notjustadz.com/quality-content-recirculation-vs-rubbish-content-recommendation/