Digital Policing
The thing that most disappoints me about the “closed-shop” approach that pervades policing, is the untold damage it causes and the related weaknesses it creates. In my opinion, it is a self-inflicted injury and ignores so many good, caring, committed, and supportive members of the public, who simply want to help. Is it so hard to believe that some people truly feel that they have a duty to collaborate with the police, and want to contribute to improving Public Safety. Surely, we haven’t cast aside one of Sir Robert Peel’s most basic principles, which states “The police are the public and the public are the police”, have we?
I understand the scepticism of some senior police figures, who are reluctant to trust anybody they don’t control directly, or see as “partners” with whom they have no choice but to interact. Sadly, the majority of such partners are further removed from public views and opinions than the police themselves, and that certainly applies to their political masters. Until we can reverse this reluctance, indeed preference, to keep collaboration from making the leap forward that it surely must, we will only be paying lip service to its potential impact.
The Association of Police & Crime Commissioners (APCC) is a well intentioned group of individuals, but very much part of the furniture nowadays. It is interesting to think that the Police Service considers this type of audience as suitable to discuss the future of their service. I personally believe that there is a pressing need to hear challenges to their plans, simply because it is a service that can only operate with the consent of the public, isn’t it? Will the requisite challenge be identified by the planned audience? I don’t think it can be.
The Police Service must come to terms with a level of challenge that, when combined, is greater than anything it has faced in its history. To meet the “fit for purpose” challenge of the 21st century, they must accept that “repurposing” officers to undertake technical roles puts the service at huge risk. Whether the hierarchy in policing acknowledge it or not, data collection, collation, analysis, and dissemination is central to the successful delivery of effective, efficient law enforcement in the future. No amount of well-intentioned internal initiatives by the NPCC or College of Policing can overcome a lack of true technologist engagement and direct involvement. Denial of this reality gives rise to extremely dangerous threats to the capability of our Police Service, so a complete rethink of how digital policing is funded, renewed, maintained, and operationally delivered is a must.
Again, I feel that these concerns will not come as a surprise to anyone in the know. However, the fact that this debate is a national imperitive seems to be overlooked because it is difficult, expensive, and resource hungry. What price do we place on our safety at individual, family and national level?
#policingbypublicconsent
Global risks and local responses - positive policing for the future.
Tomorrow marks the start of the NPCC and Association of Police and Crime Commissioners Summit 2024, where we’ll hear from a wide range of guests and speakers across policing, criminal justice, law enforcement, government and third sector, all joining together to discuss the future of our service.
While the event is in person only, we will be live-streaming our three key note speakers on Tuesday and Wednesday mornings so keep checking back here for the link. We’ll also be sharing a series of thought leadership pieces over the two days giving different perspectives on key policing issues for now and the future.
It’s set to be an exciting, thought-provoking and inspiring few days, so stay tuned…
Certified Professional Medical Coder (Cardiology)
1wThank all officers for their service 💙🚔