🇩🇰 🌲 Denmark will plant 1 billion trees and convert 10% of its land into forests. Why is this good news for circularity? According to Circle Economy’s Circularity Gap Report Denmark, agrifood is one of the three largest contributors to Denmark’s carbon footprint. Denmark's new initiative will significantly reduce fertiliser use and shrink cropland, thereby lowering the material consumption and carbon footprint associated with agriculture and increasing Denmark’s circularity metric, which stood at 4% in 2023. The Danish government’s decision to re-forest agricultural lands over the next two decades has been called ‘the biggest change to the Danish landscape in over 100 years’. Developing forests can improve air quality, increase soil health and encourage biodiversity, regenerating Denmark's ecosystems. 👏 We applaud the Danish government’s decision and hope other countries will follow its lead. Discover other strategies to boost circularity in Denmark: https://lnkd.in/eR9Y5Muf
If they needed the 10% before to produce food, to which country/region are they "outsourcing" their food production? It's a great initiative, but I fear only with a local impact.
Denmark has become the trailblaizer for progressive sustainability policy! I hope other countries, especially NL will invest in ecosystem restoration and reforestation, its very needed: with lowest percentage of forest cover in Europe..
Zambia has vast empty land which we can use for such initiatives. Lets take a leaf from such initiatives.
Impressive - thanks, I was not aware of. 👏
Very helpful
Congratulations, Denmark! Marianne Koefoed
Great step forward
Author: Timber! How wood can save the world from climate breakdown. Published June 2024. Director Public Affairs @CEIBois, EOS & @TimberDevUK. Former MEP.
3wI’m all for Denmark increasing its forest cover, partly because it currently has blow the European average, but does anyone know what this move is predicted to do in relation to Denmark’s food production? If the new tree planting follows primarily an agroforestry approach then levels of current food production could be potentially continued. However a straight swop of land that is currently 100% agriculture to instead 100% forestry will presumably reduce food production. Does anyone know?