The future of outbound faces two big problems. You can only control one of them. FIRST PROBLEM Spray and pray is not sustainable. It is actually what got us into our current mess of flooded inboxes and wasteful practices. Even when spray and pray “worked well,” it was not an efficient approach for GTM teams. But money was free and targets were high, so many did not care. Now it takes 4x more activities than 5 years ago to generate an opportunity through outbound. AI and automation have made terrible outbound practices too easy, which has made reaching prospects much harder. Unfortunately, you cannot control the current state of outbound…which brings me to the next big problem. SECOND PROBLEM In the past, companies believed that you can “throw bodies” at the problem. If your team is underperforming, just hire more salespeople to solve the issue. Even if individuals underperform, it is fine as long as you hit overall targets. In this case, leaders are more comfortable throwing activities at the problem than finding a sustainable solution. When hitting targets gets hard, increasing the number of activities is often the solution. At least that is something you can show that proves “I did my job.” But since spray and pray outbound is not sustainable, this mindset will quickly backfires. Luckily, this is something you can control. It requires a mindset shift from activity-based selling → signal-based selling. Signal-based selling, when done right, makes outbound more relevant, more intentional, and less wasteful. This is why we are seeing more companies adopt signal-based motions — you cannot control the state of outbound, but you can control how you adjust your strategy.
Great post Christian Kletzl. From your experience are people heeding your warning, or are you still seeing companies try and throw more spaghetti at the wall?
Two big ones there. There’s a 3rd that not a lot of people speak about. AUTONOMY How can we expect our people to improve efficiency when we don’t give them the levers to do so? How can we expect our people to REALLY give a poop about improving someone else’s work? When we tell them what to say, how to say it, who to say it to, when to say it? How can be accountable for anything other than clicking buttons faster and driving volume? The winners maximize autonomy. Today it’s more important than adherence. They know the playbook is old news by the time it’s written. The sender always owns their tactics so long as they fit the vision.
"AI and automation have made terrible outbound practices too easy, which has made reaching prospects much harder."
Indeed! All human behavior will eventually adapt and evolve, the responses and what works will have to as well to stay competitive. Signals are the new warm leads.
President @ Sales Assembly | GTM Leader | Coffee Fan
5moSo in a nutshell, improve the conversion metric vs. just improving the volume of outreach. Resonates a ton right now.