Chris Deacon’s Post

View profile for Chris Deacon, graphic

Speaker. Thought Leader. Truth Teller. Disruptor. *All content non-AI Generated*

Just two years ago, Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) was being hailed as the next big thing in healthcare at conferences like HLTH and J.P. Morgan Health. Their big plans to combine primary care, in-home care, and pharmacy services were going to "revolutionize healthcare." As Roz Brewer, CEO of WBA, confidently stated at HLTH 2022: “Healthcare is local, and most times healthcare happens outside of the current health system. We have the ability to take our relationship between the pharmacist and the consumer, combine that with the primary care that VillageMD delivers, and the in-home care that CareCentrix offers… and we can patch together a continuum of care and deliver healthcare services through a brand that everyone knows and trusts.” Brewer highlighted investments in VillageMD, CareCentrix, and Shields Health Solutions as key to building this “continuum of care,” leveraging nearly 9,000 stores to bring healthcare services to people's doorsteps. John Driscoll, EVP and President of U.S. Healthcare, added: “We will continue to invest in, expand and leverage partnerships with entrepreneurs throughout the healthcare system because we know that with our 86,000 healthcare providers along with our partners, we can provide a more accessible and better-connected experience for patients.” Fast forward and it's a completely different story. Walgreens is shutting down stores and scaling back its healthcare ventures. The latest financial results for Walgreens Boots Alliance show significant losses and unmet expectations. The Wall Street Journal and other outlets have detailed the decline. And it's not just Walgreens. Big players like CVS and Walmart have also pumped huge sums into primary care and digital health, only to watch these investments fall short and cut their losses. The truth is, we can't expect corporations like CVS, Walmart, or Walgreens to solve our healthcare woes. Why? If a healthcare solution doesn’t align perfectly with their financial model, it’s doomed from the start. Healthcare is fundamentally local, and these giant corporations simply aren’t. They lack the ability to tailor their services to the unique needs of different communities. What's missing from these grand strategies? Understanding that healthcare models need to be customized for specific populations. Few organizations have effectively used data and analytics to address unique needs, and the crucial provider-patient relationship is overlooked in large-scale corporate plans. Moral of the story? HLTH may not be worth the investment if you're looking for good predictors of success. And... a more localized, patient-focused approach is necessary to truly transform healthcare. *Credit to Jeffrey Hogan for highlighting the HLTH connection. Brian KlepperAl Lewis 🇺🇦Alex JungLee LewisShawn Gremminger John TozziAnn M. Richardson, MBA

Walgreens Plans Major U.S. Store Closures; Shares Tumble

Walgreens Plans Major U.S. Store Closures; Shares Tumble

wsj.com

.Dave Chase, Health Rosetta-discovering archaeologist

Healthcare Transformation Author & Speaker | Chief Archaeologist at Health Rosetta

5mo

The bit I knew of about VillageMD was that they’d created something meaningful and important. This is especially important as there’s been so little positive news in primary care in decades. I can’t think of an example of where a large entity whether a giant corp, health system, carrier or P-E firm has added lasting value to primary care. We need to focus our attention on aiding the success and resilience of independent medical groups.

One of the other big lessons from this is for employers who now are finally getting data and analytics from their plan’s carriers because of CAA is that they can/should use this data to glean insights and direction on the unique things that their plan’s population needs. Boxed solutions generally don’t serve the unique needs of specific employers. Nationally their are local and regional clinical providers, CINS, ASCs and even health systems capable of reviewing employer data and customizing at risk solutions to manage the unique needs of those employers. Finding those is a worthy investment of time and resources.

The number of corporations and start-ups that have claimed they're going to "fix" healthcare in the U.S. and failed is notable. And yet it's also been completely accepted as being okay and, like Charlie Brown once again approaching the football held by Lucy optimistic that he'll get off a good kick this time, many believe "this time," "this latest solution" will be different. Meanwhile, any talk of the government embarking on a bold initiative to address the problem is met with fierce resistance by those who insist any government solution will be a failure. To quote Alanis Morrissette, "And isn't it ironic... don't you think? A little too ironic... and, yeah, I really do think..."

Marcee Chmait

Digital Health Executive. Digital Partnerships @ Providence’s Digital Innovation Group

5mo

We have to unlock the third party reimbursement model to have breakthrough business models in healthcare. You can assemble and reassemble parts of the care continuum but if the only way to get paid remains the same it can’t work.

Cathy Calva Cather

CEO at Parallel Profile, Named Top 10 Most Innovative Healthcare Companies by Employer Health Innovation Roundtable (EHIR) and Forbes Top 52 Female Led Startups

5mo

Which stores? Why those stores? Is it the large impact of not arresting organized gangs of shop lifters who clean out entire sections on shelves and resell the stolen goods at swap meets or online a major contributor? Do homeless populations drive some of these closures as in San Francisco union square? Or is it just online competitors gaining market share? Does CVS owning a major PBM offering preferred prices at CVS contribute to lost profitability? Would employers wholesale embracing transparent PBMs help eliminate the market distortion? They are going forward with VillageMD despite not being majority owner. I want what’s fastest, easiest, most convenient good care. I don’t care who accomplishes it. Maybe local health systems should invest in VillageMD too—collaborate.

Andrew Bethel

Systems Thinker | Problem Solver | Change Agent

5mo

If all healthcare is inherently local, than any national brand is essentially worthless in this space. Nobody wants to receive their healthcare services in a retail setting. As a nation, we need to empower independent providers by ensuring they are the ones who can actually turn a reasonable profit by providing the cost-effective, quality healthcare services that we all need. Primary care is really not that expensive. The fundamental concepts behind cost accounting must be forced upon the entire healthcare industry. Anything “big” is the problem. Reduce and eliminate the big. Cultivate and nuture the small. It’s really that simple.

Cindy Throop

Founder, Research Director, Senior Strategic Consultant

5mo

From what I've heard "locally," they have been leaving pharmacy customers hanging for many months now. Just from looking at Next Door posts, I've been hearing about people switching to different pharmacies because of ongoing challenges getting prescriptions filled. Within the last couple weeks, someone was talking about their efforts to refill *critical* meds, but their Walgreens store is 'temporarily closed' for unclear reasons. They talked about how they had to contact their prescriber at off hours to have the Rx transferred elsewhere. It's just gross to see how locally people have been struggling to get prescriptions filled at local Walgreen stores for months now. While official reasons might be pharmacy staffing issues, it's making more sense now. Start backing out of providing critical services for X months without public transparency to maximize profit/minimize loss before coming clean on what's really going on. Any corporation interested in anything local is interested in colonialism/wealth extraction from those communities. This is infuriating.

Sergei Polevikov, ABD, MBA, MS, MA 🇮🇱🇺🇦

2023 Elsevier Author of "Advancing AI in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Best Practices"

5mo

Walgreens paid $9.7 billion for VillageMD across three investments. In just two years, they lost $9 billion on this VillageMD investment. The sad and cruel irony is that because of these poor and, I believe, unethical decisions by Walgreens' management, the entire century-old iconic company is now worth as much as they paid for VillageMD: https://sergeiai.substack.com/p/the-big-bath-of-tim-wentworth-or P.S. The HLTH acronym turned out to be unlucky for another healthcare company, Cue Health, which filed for bankruptcy a month ago, trading under the ticker "HLTH".

Like
Reply
Herbert Whitehouse

Hoping to collaboratively provide fiduciaries, unions, and other plan sponsors with practical guidance & creative solutions that are worth anywhere from 100 to 1 million times my consulting fee.

5mo

“Healthcare is fundamentally local, and these giant corporations simply aren’t. They lack the ability to tailor their services to the unique needs of different communities.” But employers can be; and local police, fire, and other local government providers of service are. And the Wagreens in that local community could also be empowered to think and act appropriately for that community.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics