Alpha is in the lower mid market. Institutional LP's (at least in CRE) don't seem to be able to play there. Seems like an opportunity for a new type of product to help bridge the gap to the smartest institutional LP's can get access to the GP's that have historically not been interested in them/on their radar? What am I missing: - Institutional LP's and their consultants are limited by both time, check size (big) and risk (low) - GP's with great returns have been able to operate at just below the radar of institutions and raise money via friends and family (aka HNW) so have not "needed" institutional capital - Governance used to be a big issue but today, many of these GP's have institutional like governance (note: it's not exactly what is needed but closer than you think) and returns that are phenomenal.
💯 agree with you! You’re speaking my language! There isn’t a need for a new product per se in my opinion (lot of product out there), but both LPs and GPS just need help with the “shidduch.” Those LPs willing to look at lower middle market managers will be rewarded in this cycle.
Shhhh! Stop talking about it and just send them my way. The last three new real estate fund relationships we established were for $50, $100 and $125 million funds.
Love this, Brandon Sedloff and Jonathan Glick. I think there’s a real opportunity for family office investors (who may not have the same constraints as certain large institutions) to take advantage of this dynamic.
The answer is programmatic JVs and platform transactions, which are the only efficient way to aggregate a portfolio at scale for institutional investors and others writing similar sized checks. This makes sense when a lower middle market sponsor has an edge in a particular transaction type, asset class, or both. The challenge is that many sponsors are either not setup or are unwilling to meet institutional investor requirements around reporting, major decision rights, and non-retail investor waterfalls. We structure and invest through the types of transactions I described above.
Institutional LP’s are the only people in the world that always ask “Do you have anything more expensive we can buy?”
That’s where AGW Capital and I come in—bridging the gap between midsize GPs, who have maxed out their HNW networks and are ready to scale, but struggle to attract and communicate with institutional LPs and their advisors. Think of it as a fractional Head of Capital Formation or CIO meeting an equity/debt broker.
Couldn’t agree more! Lower middle market is where value can really be added. It’s also where experience is a real differentiator.
This is a crucial part of our thesis at Hammond Capital
Totally agree, and ditto for public real estate (REIT) managers.
Multifamily Investing • Career Growth • Free Weekly Newsletter • Creator of "The Career Compass"
1moI can only help but think that lower mid market GPs thrive due in large part to sourcing capital from existing relationships (i.e. friends, family, and country club) in exchange for retaining their control rights with respect to future liquidity events and decision making power. Sure, it's nice to have a single LP at $5M-$15M, but it's also nice to help one's inner circle grow their personal wealth. Curious if this aligns with what you've seen or heard, Brandon Sedloff?