Bryan Tiedemann’s Post

View profile for Bryan Tiedemann, graphic

Founder at Dirty Pelican Evolving the way we drink cocktails & mocktails. Growing a national beverage brand selling the highest-end mixers on Earth 🌎 Skinny, Organic, Gluten Free, No Preservatives, Kosher

Should a brand stick to one strategy or is it intelligent to diversify? Further Detail: Dirty Pelican is currently the ONLY full line of USDA Organic and Skinny Cocktail Mixers. This is obviously a title we love to wear loud and proud. The Challenge: Considering our use of USDA Organic ingredients and no preservatives, it makes our product double the price as our competitors. Which narrows our customer segment. The Question: Are we presenting the wrong message to put out a line of mixers that are not USDA Organic and use Conventional fruits to lower our price point? In turn, broadening our available customer market? (note: we would still be 50% more than our competitors and would still offer our USDA Organic line. No compromise in taste quality) Adding thought leaders to draw reach and insights: Kyle Fitzpatrick Molly Fedick Taylor Foxman Rebecca A. Styn, Ph.D. Katie Dunn Sean Riley Roman Sydorenko Will Nitze Ben Branson Jason Feifer Kim Gamez

  • No alternative text description for this image
Rebecca A. Styn, Ph.D.

Founder & CEO of Award-Winning Blind Tiger - Classic Spirit-Free Cocktails Made for the Modern Drinker | WBENC-Certified

1mo

two cents here: Diversifying your product line to include mixers that use conventional fruits and are non-organic is a smart move to broaden your market reach - as long as you're transparent in the process. There’s a substantial group of consumers looking for high-quality, affordable options. By offering a lower-cost line, you’re making your brand more accessible to those who prioritize value without strictly requiring organic ingredients. Clearly differentiating between organic and conventional lines will allow consumers to make informed choices, and it can actually build even more trust in your brand. Highlighting both your commitment to quality and your desire to make your mixers accessible to a wider audience could resonate well with both markets. Plus, you might find that you’re able to introduce new customers to your brand who could become fans of your organic line in the future

Sean Wachsman

CPG Fractional CMO (Brand Strategy & Go-To-Market Specialist) ✦ Consigliere & Optimistic Rebel ✦ Jack Daniel’s to Dan-O’s, Iconic to Emerging Brands ✦ Passionate Community Builder

1mo

Stick to your core strategy and do one thing great. You’re still early in your brand building process and at that price point it will take some time, unless you don’t have the time. Introducing an additional line, such as you’re suggesting, when you’re still new will likely cause confusion for people and distract you. Hammer your core values and message over and over of the current line and build the value there. This will set you up for future lines. If you’re seeing little to no traction at the current price point, you may need to re-evaluate your core strategy and consider reformulating for a more accessible product line that meets your standards.

Sara Stender Delaney

Founder/CEO, Beverage Formulator x Sarilla, Winner of BevNet Packaging + SOFI Awards (DrinkSarilla.com), Speaker, Philanthropist, Importer

1mo

Organic and no preservatives is a hugely important differentiation and seems like they would be part of your brand pillars so straying from those values is very risky. I'm not sure why it has to be "double the price" however... if you can operate at scale and are sourcing strategically. Why do you feel you need to offer a lower quality/conventional line (is the market size not large enough?)?

Like
Reply
Analesia Yonts

CPG Entrepreneur | Co-founder, Plentiful Harvest Demos 🌱 | Excited to drive trial, product visibility, & success in the consumer goods space

1mo

For a brand like Dirty Pelican, that proudly holds the title of the only full USDA Organic, Skinny Cocktail Mixer line, diluting the brand with a non-organic version could feel like it’s compromising the very thing that makes it special. The thing is people are loyal to your brand because they trust your commitment to quality. When a company branches out with a “budget” option, it can blur the message and confuse customers about where your standards actually lie. Will they start questioning whether the organic line is worth it if you offer a cheaper, conventional one that’s still close in taste? That’s a big risk to take. On the other hand, there could be an option to introduce a lower-cost, conventionally sourced line under a different name or label entirely, keeping Dirty Pelican exclusively USDA Organic and premium. This would allow you to reach new customers who want to explore the brand’s flavors without weakening the core image.

Mary Pellettieri

Co Founder at La Pavia Beverage Inc

1mo

My two cents, the organic moniker may only be seen as a value add by certain retailers, and consumers may not buy it for 2x standard price. For some reason, trading up for organic in cocktails doesn't always resonate. Cocktailers (bartenders and consumers) tend to look for novelty, flavor, quality, but organic isn't always top of list in our experience (as we were told by an organic maker of spirits.) If you can add organic ingredients, and compete on cost, then you are onto something more viable for commercial success.

Brayden Yonts

Co-founder of Plentiful Harvest Demos 🍋 Entrepreneur in the CPG industry with a foundation in communications.

1mo

My 2¢: Introducing a second line could broaden reach, but as I've personally seen with Oatly’s "Super Basic" line, it risks confusing consumers about brand standards. Clarity on quality commitment can be a big player in avoiding eroding trust.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics