Bob Crimmins’ Post

View profile for Bob Crimmins, graphic

VC | Serial Founder | Engineer | Father | Artist | Philosopher

I've spent many 100s of hours over the past few years trying to distill the fundamentals of what I think I've learned over my 25 years as a founder, mentor, advisor and investor. Turns out, unexpectedly, that failure is more important that success. Go figure. I know it's sexy to talk about how to achieve startup success. That's certainly where virtually all attention is spent. But I prefer to understand startup failure, as it's the nominal case for venture-scale startups... by a large margin. Besides, in the end, every time you reduce your probability of failure, you commensurately increase your probability of success. So paying attention to failure positively impacts success! If the failure rate of startups (not yours of course) is 95% and the success rate is 5%, seems like it might be worthwhile to spend a minute removing some of that big piece than to only try to grow the small piece. By my reconning, the success rate of startups has been roughly unchanged over 30+ years. If waxing eloquent about the frameworks, philosophies and founder factors that lead to success hasn't moved the needle on that, maybe there's a better way. As an example, one of the underrated principles that underlie the venture-scale founder journey is time. Popular advice here is "move fast and break things" or "speed is a feature" or "do more faster." These are pithy and they convey an important idea. But they are also terrible, impotent advice and have never materially moved the needle of success for any startup. Meanwhile...

  • graphical user interface, text, application
Ben Park, MBA

Serial entrepreneur, teacher, mentor for early-stage startup companies, and author.

1mo

I agree

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics