Anna Kramer’s Post

The more I cover energy and environment, the more obvious it becomes how much the climate coalition is not aligned on strategy, on how to actually make change happen. Case in point: Manchin's new permitting bill. It's undeniable that permitting and siting rules, environmental reviews, and litigation are making it nearly impossible to build enough clean energy, killing countless projects before they get off the ground. The Manchin-Barrasso bill proposes to fix a lot of the problems, giving clean energy and transmission a more equal footing with fossil fuels (which currently have a much easier process). But it also gives some big concessions to the oil and gas industry. The Sierra Club, Earthjustice, and the Center for Biological Diversity are among those who adamantly oppose this bill. But everyone in the clean energy world is thrilled, convinced the concessions are worth it to ensure clean energy can actually compete with the fossil fuels they're trying to replace. So who's right, and why the disagreement? I captured the growing rifts in the climate coalition in my latest for NOTUS:

Where Clean Energy Developers and Environmentalists Fracture

Where Clean Energy Developers and Environmentalists Fracture

notus.org

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics