Ani Dasgupta’s Post

While there’s certainly some concerns about what a Trump presidency will mean for climate transition, its important to focus on some of the momentum and realities around progress since 2016. There are lots of balanced reflections out there today that note the challenges, but positively highlight a way to keep the wheels turning: 1. Bipartisan support is well-entrenched on many aspects of energy transition in the US, and things like clean energy subsidies are unlikely to be fully rolled back, given that many Red states are already befitting from these. Trump can of course use his executivr power to repeal the IRA, but many Republicans could oppose a wholesale repeal. 2. While the US is obviously a big player in global emissions, efforts were already underway to maintain climate diplomacy efforts without US leadership, with a Trump victory “priced in” to climate negotiations (and as many commentators point out, the US hasn’t always had a great track record on ambition when it comes to climate, anyway). 3. There is more political will and momentum on energy transition globally today than there was in 2016 – and this will go far in keeping focus. The transition to net zero will continue to happen regardless of who is in the Oval Office. Some good level-setting analysis here from World Resources Institute; Bloomberg News, Climate Home News , and many other experts from Science Media Centre. More detail included: https://lnkd.in/dGqZasW7 https://lnkd.in/dw87Wi-J https://lnkd.in/d3aaSqqr https://lnkd.in/dg_spbdx So we need to see precisely what will happen of course, but not all doom and gloom (though just a bit).

In a recent article by ABC News, we see the stark contrasts between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump on climate change and energy policy. Harris, with a history of supporting the Green New Deal and casting the tiebreaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act, clearly prioritizes a swift transition to green energy. Trump, on the other hand, continues to advocate for increased fossil fuel production, dismissing the urgency of climate action. The divergence in their stances underscores a critical junction in our climate narrative. As our planet endures extreme heatwaves, the decisions made at the governmental level will either propel us towards a sustainable future or anchor us to outdated, harmful energy practices. Harris's approach aligns with a growing body of scientific evidence that emphasizes the need for immediate and aggressive action to mitigate climate change. The article reveals the complexity of navigating the political landscape while trying to address the climate crisis. It's essential to recognize the influence of policy on our ability to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and transition to a clean energy economy. The debate between Harris and Trump is not just political—it's a choice between two very different futures for our planet. As we move forward, it's crucial to support policies that reflect the urgency of the climate crisis and prioritize the health of our environment. The path we choose now will have lasting impacts on generations to come. Read more about this critical issue and where the candidates stand: https://buff.ly/3Z9W4ls #ClimateAction #EnergyPolicy #SustainableFuture

🗳️ Early Voting Has Begun! Know Where Candidates Stand on Climate Before You Vote 🌍 Early voting has started across the country, and now is the time to make sure you’re informed about the candidates' positions on critical issues—especially climate change. With stark differences in how candidates approach energy and climate policy, it’s more important than ever to understand who will fight for a clean energy future and a diverse climate economy. Before you head to the polls, make sure you know where each candidate stands. Check out this insightful The Associated Press article by Matthew Daly, posted in the Boston Globe Media, which breaks down the key differences in climate and energy policy between Vice President Harris and former President Trump: https://lnkd.in/evuuc3ZN Make your voice heard and vote for the future you want! 🌱🌎 #EarlyVoting #ClimateAction #Election2024 #KnowYourCandidates #VoteForThePlanet #IVoteEnvironment #ClimateChange #CleanEnergy #ACT

Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump: Who’s Really Fighting for Our Planet? We’ve analyzed the climate policies and statements from both candidates to help you decide who’s taking real action. As we approach the next election, understanding their stance on environmental issues is crucial. Check out our detailed comparison to see who aligns with your values on climate change: https://lnkd.in/dDTp97tf Who gets your vote for a sustainable future? Let us know in the comments! #sustainableliving #climatechangeisreal #climatecrisis

Why does asset-level data matter so much? Whatever plays out within the US, it seems fairly certain that the country will most likely be less ambitious on climate adaptation and mitigation. As energy and climate policies face potential shifts with a new administration, asset-level data about environmental, climate, and physical risk themes is more crucial than ever for decision-making because it enables investors to make prudent decisions. RS Metrics’ ESGSignals provides these valuable insights, equipping investors and companies with precise, data-driven views on the environmental impacts of assets across the globe. #EnvironmentalData #ECP #Sustainability Explore more at: https://n.pr/3YE8L65

Why does asset-level data matter so much? Whatever plays out within the US, it seems fairly certain that the country will most likely be less ambitious on climate adaptation and mitigation. As energy and climate policies face potential shifts with a new administration, asset-level data about environmental, climate, and physical risk themes is more crucial than ever for decision-making because it enables investors to make prudent decisions. RS Metrics’ ESGSignals provides these valuable insights, equipping investors and companies with precise, data-driven views on the environmental impacts of assets across the globe. #EnvironmentalData #ECP #Sustainability Explore more at: https://n.pr/3YG4FKG

"The 2022 midterms saw Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Minnesota secure Democratic “trifectas” — control of the governor’s office and both houses of the state legislature — leading to significant climate legislation being passed and signed into law in those states." This, and the fact that the lowest cost renewable electricity resources are most abundant in red-trifecta states, means that the domestic clean energy transition in the United States will be minimally affected, if at all. What will face consequences is the international climate adaptation and mitigation financing landscape. The "What about China? What about India?" narrative will get the megaphone again (not that Democratic US administrations have not been chanting the same, softly). The US will stop participating in the annual COP-out exercises from these financing commitments and the rest of the developed world will quietly (but happily) follow. Over two-thirds of human population that had little or nothing to do with creating the problem will continue to bear the brunt of the climate change wrath. Again, not that this was not happening under Progressive Western administrations- it will just be more overt. Instead of quietly reneging on promises made, the new US administration will brag about it, as another "America First" effort. Never mind that America still remains first as the country with the largest cumulative (post-Industrial Revolution) consumption based carbon footprint. Way ahead of everyone else. Like it is with military spending. #ClimateEquity #ClimateJustice #ClimateFinance #ClimateAdaptation

Why does asset-level data matter so much? Whatever plays out within the US, it seems fairly certain that the country will most likely be less ambitious on climate adaptation and mitigation. As energy and climate policies face potential shifts with a new administration, asset-level data about environmental, climate, and physical risk themes is more crucial than ever for decision-making because it enables investors to make prudent decisions. RS Metrics’ ESGSignals provides these valuable insights, equipping investors and companies with precise, data-driven views on the environmental impacts of assets across the globe. #EnvironmentalData #ECP #Sustainability Explore more at: https://n.pr/3YwZsoC

Whether Trump or Kamala Harris had won the U.S. presidential election, the outcome was bound to influence global efforts to combat climate change 🌍. Each leader brings a different approach to environmental measures, impacting emissions, clean energy, and international climate commitments.   With Trump’s victory, we’re looking at a potential shift in the U.S. stance: plans to cut green energy fundings, boost fossil fuel production, and exit the Paris Climate Agreement could dampen current momentum toward sustainable energy. Leaders around the world, like Todd Stern, Christiana Figueres, and Laurence Tubiana, warn that this result poses challenges to climate progress—but they emphasize that the push for clean energy won’t stop ♻️. Clean energy technologies are here to stay, not only for environmental health but for their economic potential in a rapidly evolving world.   While federal priorities may change, cities, states, and private sectors have the power to keep the climate fight alive. As Figueres noted, “Standing with oil and gas is the same as falling behind in a fast-moving world.”    It’s up to us all to continue the transition to renewable energy and protect our planet for future generations. #ClimateAction #GlobalLeadership #ParisAgreement #GreenEnergy #SustainableFuture Source:

🌎 ❤️ What would a Kamala Harris Administration look like for climate and the environment? Excellent according to this NYT article. Vote for climate and planet in November. It will be critical to the health of our planet + people. ✅ "Vice President Kamala Harris has for years made the environment a top concern, from prosecuting polluters as California’s attorney general to sponsoring the Green New Deal as a senator to casting the tiebreaking vote as vice president for the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, the largest climate investment in United States history." “She (VP Harris) will fight every day for all Americans to have access to clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment,” Gina McCarthy, who served as national climate adviser under Mr. Biden, said in a statement Sunday." "Republicans have targeted the Inflation Reduction Act, promising to overturn it if they win control of Congress and the White House. That law pumps more than $370 billion over 10 years into wind, solar, batteries and electric vehicles. It is designed to help the country move away from fossil fuels, the burning of which is driving up global temperatures. At their convention last week, Republicans promised to halt any transition away from oil, gas and coal, and to promote more fossil fuel development." "As she runs for the White House, Ms. Harris is widely expected to try to protect the climate achievements of the Biden administration, a position that could resonate with voters during a summer of record heat. A clear majority of Americans, 65 percent, wants the country to focus on increasing solar, wind and other renewable energy and not fossil fuels, according to a May survey by the Pew Research Center." https://lnkd.in/d27M9tyR #VoteForPlanet #ClimateVote