Validate Your Product Before Investing Big in Design. I spoke with the brilliant Vicki Stirling from The Startup Network last week, and we discussed how often founders invest in design and development too early. At Refract and in the past, I’ve seen this happen a lot: founders with big visions feel the need to spend huge budgets—$100K on product development, $20K on branding, $50K on a website—believing this will automatically attract users. While ambition is great, this approach can lead to wasted resources if you haven’t validated your product first and it's important to only invest the absolute necessary needed early on for that initial MVP. Here are some affordable ways to validate your product before diving into a full build: ⚡️ Build a landing page with a clear call to action. Track sign-ups, interest, and feedback. ⚡️ Create a waitlist and aim for at least 1,000 sign-ups (as Vicki suggested) to gauge real interest. ⚡️ Run small ad campaigns to test demand and gather insights. ⚡️ Develop an MVP or prototype to get early feedback without heavy investment. ⚡️ Conduct user interviews to understand what your audience really needs. The truth is, once your product hits the market, you’ll need to stay lean and iterate based on real user feedback. Going big too soon without validation can lead to disappointment. At Refract, we advise founders to validate their ideas first. Then, scaling with the right design and development becomes far more effective. Big thank you to Vicki Stirling for chatting with me last week! And definitely check out The Startup Network if you're a founder or interested in the scene.
This is such an important discussion. Validating ideas before diving into heavy design is crucial for sustainable growth. Your tips provide excellent guidance for founders navigating this process. Have you noticed any common misconceptions about the validation phase that new entrepreneurs tend to have?
CEO at Fishburners
2mo😂 So good!