Anda Bayliss PhD CPsychol AFBPsS’ Post

View profile for Anda Bayliss PhD CPsychol AFBPsS, graphic

Evaluation Manager at Motability Foundation

In his book “A skeptic's HR dictionary”, Patrick Vermeren exposes numerous myths in the HR field over more than a thousand pages and explains why HR managers often cling so vehemently to nonsensical theories and models: an interview by Bärbel Schwertfeger. To the question about HR's susceptibility to pseudoscience, he offered four reasons: 1. Lack of knowledge and competence. Many HR employees cannot distinguish between good and bad research or even bother with it... and have very little knowledge of psychology. 2. HR has a special attraction for gullible people, romantics and idealists who consider their beliefs and experiences more important and credible than academic research. Often they do not even know that they are contradicting it. 3. The psychology of the coalition. As soon as you consider yourself part of a virtual tribe or group (Eng: in-group) that believes in Platonic idealism, it is very difficult to distance yourself from that group. Then you do not want to accept that there are also people who are not talented or motivated because you want to show loyalty to your group. 4. Tendency to believe and trust authority. The combination of our gullible nature - evolutionarily it made sense for children to learn from adults in order to survive - and our laziness - according to the law of thermodynamics, we do not want to waste unnecessary energy - makes us very susceptible to this. Because that is the easy and energy-saving way. So if someone says, I am a psychologist and have researched and published on this for many years, we tend to believe them. And many con artists and fraudsters know this too. They know that most people are gullible and tend to trust others. The author offers a mechanism for the perpetuation of the impact of the above: "As soon as a salesperson has their foot in the door and offers us a free trial, for example, we are trapped. If they then offer another paid offer and we accept it, we begin to believe in the theory or model because we want to remain consistent. As soon as this is criticized, cognitive dissonance sets in, which we want to resolve as quickly as possible and so quickly brush off the criticism. The next psychological trap is the sunk cost bias. This is our tendency to finish something because we have already invested money and time in it. All of this makes it almost impossible to dissuade people from something they believe in." Too harsh a criticism? A brave stance? #HR #myths #risk #evidence #organisations https://lnkd.in/epQk_FrT

HR-Mythen: Lexikon des Unsinns - WIRTSCHAFTSPSYCHOLOGIE HEUTE

HR-Mythen: Lexikon des Unsinns - WIRTSCHAFTSPSYCHOLOGIE HEUTE

https://www.wirtschaftspsychologie-heute.de

Anda Bayliss PhD CPsychol AFBPsS

Evaluation Manager at Motability Foundation

6mo
Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics