Low Glycemic Index Breads, fortified with Dietary and Prebiotic Fiber for Arihafoods Private Limited Innovator: Mr. Amit Vaishnav, is a graduate Mechanical Engineer from the Maharaja Sayaji Rao University, Baroda (Vadodara, Gujarat), batch of 1982. Background for Innovation: 1. More than one in three Indians are Diabetic 2. More than one in three of the younger generations have their weight above average or are obese. 3. Most people eat “Junk Foods” regularly 4. Most processed foods are high on calories, fats, carbohydrates but are very low on Dietary Fiber 5. Consequently, most people have impacted digestive disorders and suffer from frequent consumption of these foods. Technology: The Innovator has been responsible for the pioneering innovations and process patents in the 90’s of: 1. Ultra Low Water Activity – a formulation process by which the water activity of the product is brought into acceptable levels. 2. Very High Pressure, Temperature and Time – a process by which we can process foods. Innovation: The Bread is formulated with ingredients that result in the final Glycemic Index (GI), which is indicative of how much and how fast the blood glucose level would rise / peak in the blood after consumption. The flours selected in the formulation have their GI within the mid-range of 50’s GI. The formulation does not have any added sugars, starches, carbohydrates which can contribute to the total GI score. To improve the consumers “Gut Health” – the product formulation is fortified with addition of Crude Dietary Fiber as well as Prebiotic Fiber, this to the extent of providing almost 30% of the day’s requirement of Dietary Fiber in one 100g Low GI Bread Loaf. While the baked Low GI Breads have the moisture in control in terms of the water activity – the product needs to be protected for preservation / longer shelf life. To enable this – the breads are packed using the Modified Atmosphere Packaging Technology and using a suitable packaging material that does not allow the ambient air / oxygen from getting into contact with the product to cause any microbial spoilage. The 100g “Meal Substitute” Low GI Bread Loaf provides just about 200 kcal in a Low GI format as being fortified with 30% of the day’s requirement of Dietary Fiber, the consumer does not experience any hunger pangs for up to 4 to 5 hours after consumption. In addition, the fortification of Prebiotic Fiber improves the Gut Health. Regular / daily consumption of the Low GI Bread Loaf as a Meal Substitute for minimum 1 meal per day will not only improve overall and gut health but will also help the consumer loose 2 – 3 kgs of weight per months during the initial months till the body stabilizes its dietary functions. The average increase of the Blood Glucose measured one and half after the consumption showed an increase of an average of 66 points as against an acceptable 120 units. This is tremendously beneficial for all diabetics and the calorie conscious persons
Amit Vaishnav’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Food Testing Services in All Lucknow jhansi. Call Testing : 09634263373 Website : https://lnkd.in/gP63fsCm -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Food testing involves analyzing food products for various quality, safety, and nutritional factors. The main goals are to ensure the food is safe for consumption, meets regulatory standards, and matches label claims. This process can include tests for contaminants (like bacteria, pesticides, and heavy metals), nutritional content (such as vitamins, proteins, and fats), and physical properties (like texture and color). Advanced techniques like chromatography, spectrometry, and microbiological assays are often used in food testing laboratories.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The recent FDA crackdown in Maharashtra on a leading QSR chain for misleading consumers by substituting real cheese with cheese analogues in certain menu items while still labelling them as 'cheese' has brought focus back on the responsibility of Food Service Operators to comply with FSSAI Regulations. 1. REGULATION COMPLIANCE a. Failure to comply with regulations could be due to ignorance, oversight or intent. Regulations leave no room for such interpretation. b. Decision to use substitutes is with Food Business Operators. Regulations seek a truthful representation of the food item nomenclature. c. Compliance with Menu Labelling Regulations is non-negotiable d. Labelling display are per laid down guidelines 2. COMPREHENSION OF THE FOOD ITEM Whether it's dairy analogues or other ingredient substitutions, transparency and truthful representation are non-negotiable. Specific to the subject, here are some areas that are potential to mislead a consumer Dairy Analogues are products in which milk fat has been partially or wholly replaced by vegetable fats or oils. They are found in; a. Cream analogues (instant whipped cream topping, sour cream substitute) b. Milk powder analogues c. Non-dairy based beverage whitener (includes, condensed milk analogue, blend of evaporated skimmed milk and vegetable fat, blend of sweetened condensed milk and veg fat) d. Cream powder analogues (imitation dry cream mix, and blends of skimmed milk and veg fat in powder form) e. Cheese analogues (imitation cheese, imitation cheese mixes and powders) Some other examples of consumer miscommunication are; a. Fat spreads being called butter b. Plant based beverage from soy, oat, cashew, etc called as milk c. Vegetable protein analogues called by meat reference – plant-based meat, plant-based chicken, plant based egg, etc d. Herbal infusions called as Tea Wrong use of nomenclatures jeopardise not just consumer trust but also cause serious health concerns, since nutrition content and allergens of substitute products could be vastly different from the true nature of the product. Yet, Chefs and Operations Teams may not be well-versed in these regulations and their implementation. Standardizing menu labelling through digitization is the way forward, ensuring accuracy and compliance while mitigating risks. Working with some of the finest brands in the food service industry, LabelBlind® has digitised the process of menu labelling into a systematic workflow process, minimising mislabelling risks. Costs are economical, the process is accurate, fast and leaves very little to manual work. Get in touch. Get over with manual struggles for compliance. Put a strong foot forward as a trusted business that upholds consumer safety.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The recent FDA crackdown in Maharashtra on a leading QSR chain for misleading consumers by substituting real cheese with cheese analogues in certain menu items while still labelling them as 'cheese' has brought focus back on the responsibility of Food Service Operators to comply with FSSAI Regulations. 1. REGULATION COMPLIANCE a. Failure to comply with regulations could be due to ignorance, oversight or intent. Regulations leave no room for such interpretation. b. Decision to use substitutes is with Food Business Operators. Regulations seek a truthful representation of the food item nomenclature. c. Compliance with Menu Labelling Regulations is non-negotiable d. Labelling display are per laid down guidelines 2. COMPREHENSION OF THE FOOD ITEM Whether it's dairy analogues or other ingredient substitutions, transparency and truthful representation are non-negotiable. Specific to the subject, here are some areas that are potential to mislead a consumer Dairy Analogues are products in which milk fat has been partially or wholly replaced by vegetable fats or oils. They are found in; a. Cream analogues (instant whipped cream topping, sour cream substitute) b. Milk powder analogues c. Non-dairy based beverage whitener (includes, condensed milk analogue, blend of evaporated skimmed milk and vegetable fat, blend of sweetened condensed milk and veg fat) d. Cream powder analogues (imitation dry cream mix, and blends of skimmed milk and veg fat in powder form) e. Cheese analogues (imitation cheese, imitation cheese mixes and powders) Some other examples of consumer miscommunication are; a. Fat spreads being called butter b. Plant based beverage from soy, oat, cashew, etc called as milk c. Vegetable protein analogues called by meat reference – plant-based meat, plant-based chicken, plant based egg, etc d. Herbal infusions called as Tea Wrong use of nomenclatures jeopardise not just consumer trust but also cause serious health concerns, since nutrition content and allergens of substitute products could be vastly different from the true nature of the product. Yet, Chefs and Operations Teams may not be well-versed in these regulations and their implementation. Standardizing menu labelling through digitization is the way forward, ensuring accuracy and compliance while mitigating risks. Working with some of the finest brands in the food service industry, LabelBlind®️ has digitised the process of menu labelling into a systematic workflow process, minimising mislabelling risks. Costs are economical, the process is accurate, fast and leaves very little to manual work. Get in touch. And let us introduce you to the benefits of digital food labelling using FoLSol®️ - India's 1st Digital Food Labelling Solution. Get over with manual struggles for compliance. Put a strong foot forward as a trusted business that upholds consumer safety. #fssai #fda #foodlabelling #foodandbeverageindustry
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Food Testing Services in All Jaipur Kota. Call Testing : 09634263373 Website : https://lnkd.in/gP63fsCm -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Food testing involves analyzing food products for various quality, safety, and nutritional factors. The main goals are to ensure the food is safe for consumption, meets regulatory standards, and matches label claims. This process can include tests for contaminants (like bacteria, pesticides, and heavy metals), nutritional content (such as vitamins, proteins, and fats), and physical properties (like texture and color). Advanced techniques like chromatography, spectrometry, and microbiological assays are often used in food testing laboratories.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🥛Danone vs. 🧀Kraft Heinz: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐌𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐃𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭? 🌟 Product Portafolio 🔹#Danone: 🥛 Dairy & Plant-Based Products: 52% of revenue 🍼 Specialized Nutrition: 31% of revenue (🤯51% of of operating profit❗) 💧 Water: 17% 🔸#KraftHeinz: 🍴 Condiments & Sauces: 33.5% of revenue 🧀 Cheese & Dairy: 14.5% ❄️ Frozen/Chilled Foods: 11% 🥩 Meats and Seafood: 9% 🥤 Refreshment Beverages: 7% 🍰 Desserts: 5% ☕ Coffee: 3.5% 👶 Infant and Nutrition: 1.5% 🌎 Geographic Footprint 🔹Danone is active worldwide: Europe: 34% of revenue (France: 8%) Asia, Middle East, Africa & Latin America: 29% North America: 25% (with the U.S. contributing 22% of total sales) China and Oceania contribute 30% of operating profit (China: 10%) despite representing only 12% of sales, reflecting the region's high profitability. 🔸Kraft Heinz is more North America-focused (75% of revenue), with 69% of revenue from the U.S. and only 25% from international markets. 📈 Financial Comparison Despite a similar scale in #EBITDA (Danone: $5.1B, Kraft Heinz: $6.5B), their approaches differ dramatically: 🔹Danone’s higher gross margin (48% vs. Kraft Heinz’s 35%) reflects its focus on premium products, especially in high-value categories like Specialized Nutrition. 🔸 Kraft Heinz compensates for its lower gross margin with leaner operations, which helps sustain profitability. Its reliance on Walmart (21% of sales) also speaks to its efficiency-driven, mass-market strategy. 🏆 Competitive Landscape 🔹Danone and Kraft Heinz compete in #Dairy, a core business for both companies. Danone's dairy business generates $15B annually, making it a global leader, while Kraft Heinz's dairy segment contributes $4B and focuses on cheese. 🔹 Danone also competes with giants like Nestlé (Perrier, San Pellegrino), PepsiCo (Aquafina), and The Coca-Cola Company (Danasi) in water, and with Nestlé, Lactalis Group, and General Mills (Yoplait) in yogurt. 🔸Kraft Heinz, on the other hand, competes with Unilever (Hellmann’s) & McCormick & Company in sauces as well as with Nestlé and General Mills in packaged foods. 💡𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈 𝐒𝐞𝐞 𝐈𝐭 🔹𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐞 is known for its yogurts and dairy products, but the high-margin business driving the company is Specialized Nutrition, with brands like Nutricia, Almirón, and AlmiNatur contributing over 50% of operating profit while accounting for less than a third of sales. The company’s future seems focused on plant-based products, dairy substitutes, and high-protein foods, supported by strong R&D investments—three times higher than Kraft Heinz. 🔸𝐊𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐭 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐳, on the other hand, is a leaner, more U.S.-centric business with lower margins and less focus on next-generation products. However, its well-established brands and strength in traditional categories like condiments, sauces, and cheese ensure its strong market position.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝘼2 𝙈𝙞𝙡𝙠/𝙈𝙞𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩 - 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙜𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙘𝙠 𝙤𝙧 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙩𝙝𝙮 𝙤𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 ? Recently FSSAI (Food Safety & Standards Authority of India) had issued instruction to stop distinguishing milk /milk products as A1 or A2 in their marketing. Is there any merit in FSSAI's call ? Presenting some facts for clarity : 【1】Milk is key source of protein. Milk Protein is of two major types - Whey Protein 1& Cesin Protein. Cesin has a sub type called - Beta Cesin. Beta Cesin has two types - A1 & A2. 【2】A1 Beta-Cesin is linked with Type 1 Diabetes & Heart disease though there is no conclusive proof. 【3】The origin of the above hypothesis is a study by NZ scientists (Dr Mc Lachlan) in 1993 who proved that A1 milk caused digestion issues, heart disease & Type 1 diabetes. Three years later another scientist (Prof Woodford) came out with similar results. The interesting part is in both cases scientists involved in studies actually had business interest in A2 milk companies so the authenticity of the study is questionable. 【4】Though the study results were refuted but the impression that A2 milk is healthier got stuck in consumers mind & companies are encashing the same. 【5】 Most of the cow/buffalo milk supplied in India is A2 only which comes through Gir, Sahiwal etc breed of cow. A very small part of milk is A milk which is from hybrid breeds like Jersey. So your regular milk is A2 even if it is not labelled as A2. 【6】 A2 milk price is 1.5-2X & A2 ghee price is 4X-5X compared to A1. Now ghee is 99.99% fat and practically zero protein. How does it matter whether it's A1 or A2 and remember price is 4X-5X of A1 ghee. There could be some remote justification for the high price of A2 milk but for ghee, it cannot be even remotely justified. Now you decide whether A2 products are better off and high prices are justified or is it a marketing gimmick ? 𝘗𝘚 : 𝘍𝘚𝘚𝘈𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘈2 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘬 . 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵 (25% 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦) 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘬 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 & 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘴 𝘈2 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘬 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵. #MarketingPower #A2Milk #Health
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Insightful for our L6 Food Industry Management module 👀
🥛Danone vs. 🧀Kraft Heinz: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐌𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐃𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭? 🌟 Product Portafolio 🔹#Danone: 🥛 Dairy & Plant-Based Products: 52% of revenue 🍼 Specialized Nutrition: 31% of revenue (🤯51% of of operating profit❗) 💧 Water: 17% 🔸#KraftHeinz: 🍴 Condiments & Sauces: 33.5% of revenue 🧀 Cheese & Dairy: 14.5% ❄️ Frozen/Chilled Foods: 11% 🥩 Meats and Seafood: 9% 🥤 Refreshment Beverages: 7% 🍰 Desserts: 5% ☕ Coffee: 3.5% 👶 Infant and Nutrition: 1.5% 🌎 Geographic Footprint 🔹Danone is active worldwide: Europe: 34% of revenue (France: 8%) Asia, Middle East, Africa & Latin America: 29% North America: 25% (with the U.S. contributing 22% of total sales) China and Oceania contribute 30% of operating profit (China: 10%) despite representing only 12% of sales, reflecting the region's high profitability. 🔸Kraft Heinz is more North America-focused (75% of revenue), with 69% of revenue from the U.S. and only 25% from international markets. 📈 Financial Comparison Despite a similar scale in #EBITDA (Danone: $5.1B, Kraft Heinz: $6.5B), their approaches differ dramatically: 🔹Danone’s higher gross margin (48% vs. Kraft Heinz’s 35%) reflects its focus on premium products, especially in high-value categories like Specialized Nutrition. 🔸 Kraft Heinz compensates for its lower gross margin with leaner operations, which helps sustain profitability. Its reliance on Walmart (21% of sales) also speaks to its efficiency-driven, mass-market strategy. 🏆 Competitive Landscape 🔹Danone and Kraft Heinz compete in #Dairy, a core business for both companies. Danone's dairy business generates $15B annually, making it a global leader, while Kraft Heinz's dairy segment contributes $4B and focuses on cheese. 🔹 Danone also competes with giants like Nestlé (Perrier, San Pellegrino), PepsiCo (Aquafina), and The Coca-Cola Company (Danasi) in water, and with Nestlé, Lactalis Group, and General Mills (Yoplait) in yogurt. 🔸Kraft Heinz, on the other hand, competes with Unilever (Hellmann’s) & McCormick & Company in sauces as well as with Nestlé and General Mills in packaged foods. 💡𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈 𝐒𝐞𝐞 𝐈𝐭 🔹𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐞 is known for its yogurts and dairy products, but the high-margin business driving the company is Specialized Nutrition, with brands like Nutricia, Almirón, and AlmiNatur contributing over 50% of operating profit while accounting for less than a third of sales. The company’s future seems focused on plant-based products, dairy substitutes, and high-protein foods, supported by strong R&D investments—three times higher than Kraft Heinz. 🔸𝐊𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐭 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐳, on the other hand, is a leaner, more U.S.-centric business with lower margins and less focus on next-generation products. However, its well-established brands and strength in traditional categories like condiments, sauces, and cheese ensure its strong market position.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Survey on New FMCG Food Products 1. Are you familiar with the following new food product: canned food (Tuna , fava beens ,Sweetcorn etc, ? - Yes - No 2. If yes, have you purchased Tuna , Sweetcorn before? - Yes, I have purchased it. - No, I have not purchased it. 3. If you have purchased Tuna Sweetcorn, what influenced your decision to buy it? (Select all that apply) - Brand reputation - Attractive packaging - Quality of ingredients - Nutritional information - Price - Promotion or discounts - Product reviews or recommendations - Other (please specify) _____________ 4. If you have not purchased Tuna ,Sweetcorn, what factors deterred you from buying it? (Select all that apply) - Unfamiliar brand - Unappealing packaging - Concerns about ingredient quality - Lack of nutritional information - Price - No promotion or discounts - Negative product reviews or recommendations - Other (please specify) _____________ 5. How likely are you to purchase Tuna ,Sweetcorn in the future? - Very likely - Somewhat likely - Neutral - Somewhat unlikely - Very unlikely 6. What improvements, if any, would you suggest for the Tuna ,Sweetcorn product? - _____________ 7. Please rate the importance of the following factors when considering a food product: - Brand reputation - Packaging design - Ingredient quality - Nutritional information - Price Please rate each factor on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being "Not Important" and 5 being "Very Important." 8. Overall, how satisfied are you with the quality of FMCG food products available in stores? - Very satisfied - Somewhat satisfied - Neutral - Somewhat dissatisfied - Very dissatisfied Thank you for participating in this survey! Your feedback is valuable.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Guest blog: As Confectionery Production has covered extensively over the past couple of years, the cocoa sector continues to face significant multiple challenges on a global level. Here, Dwiti Gaggar, Associate Consultant, Food and Nutrition, offers an overview on how the industry is navigating present key tests. #cocoa #supplychains #alternatives #manufacturing #sustainability #chocolate #traceability #transparency #marketchallenges #prices #ethicalsourcing #confectioneryproduction Dwiti Gaggar https://lnkd.in/eMAZSYD2
Guest blog: Exploring the dynamics of the global cocoa supply chain - Confectionery Production
https://www.confectioneryproduction.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Big news from the beverage industry! Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) has decided to rebrand Horlicks, withdrawing its 'health' label and relaunching it as a 'functional nutritional drink.' This shift comes amidst significant regulatory changes, signaling a strategic move by HUL to adapt to evolving consumer preferences and comply with updated regulations. Stay updated on this transformation and its impact on the market dynamics. #Horlicks #FunctionalNutrition #RegulatoryChanges"
HUL withdraws 'health' label from Horlicks, rebrands it as 'functional nutritional drink' amid regulatory changes
economictimes.indiatimes.com
To view or add a comment, sign in