In 1950, Alan Turing devised his truly prophetic Turing Test to gauge whether a computer could be deemed to have acquired human intelligence, by not being detected as a machine by a panel of experts. Throughout the past 7 decades there have been various versions of this test and countless academic papers written.
In the 1980s, on a computer science course, the lecturer reminded my class that while computers were getting really powerful, any young child (who's lived in an environment where there are trees) could recognise any previously unseen tree as a tree, but no one has yet written an algorithm to teach a computer how to perform the same task.
Fast forward to 2017, at the IB Asia Pacific conference in Yokohama, I recall distinctly Dr Noriko Arai, Professor of Information & Society Research, National Institute of Informatics of Japan speaking about her research:
1) Computer programmes were already capable of passing standardised multiple choice entrance exams to most Japanese Universities
2) A computer was programmed to correctly identity an animal as a cat or dog but was completely foxed (sic) when presented with a photo of a fox!
And now last week I just read in the Guardian that researchers at the University of Reading have managed to fool their own professors by submitting ChatGPT-4 - generated take-home online assessments for undergraduate courses, which went undetected (and got better grades than real students).
The pace of AI advancement is breath-taking, though the challenge for educators remains essentially the same. Rather than block or ban the technologies (slide rules, log tables, calculators, spreadsheets, spelling & grammar checkers, online dictionaries and language translators, synthesisers & composers for music etc etc) we need to facilitate & empower our students to use these technologies with diligence and intelligence, to enhance their learning and creativity, while retaining and developing their capacity to still function effectively when such tools are not available (like finding one's way around without Google Map or doing mental arithmetic without a phone)
Let's not forget the enriching human experience of face-to-face tutoring as students discuss progress in their draft research projects in whatever discipline - the art, sciences, literature, mathematics - stage by stage with their supervisors (such as the IB extended essay process). This is how we could authenticate and value our students' development as learners, while educating ourselves - time-consuming to be sure, but especially essential in this new age
of AI.
https://lnkd.in/eW6GWdvx
Cofounder @ Profit Leap and the 1st AI advisor for Entrepreneurs | CFO, CPA, Software Engineer
7moWhat's your take? AI myth-busting or hype train? Alden Do Rosario