This.
And tack on government contract interpreters who operate in the field—I live and relive more issues from that period of my career than from my domestic military service (USAF).
And before anyone says I was better-paid: I wasn’t.
It was the earliest days of the Iraq invasion (beginning in the moments pre-invasion, actually) and they weren’t throwing money at people yet (or taking anyone who had heard Arabic for five minutes when they were three years old).
I didn’t get hazard pay despite activities like standing on demo ranges, timing pencil in hand, interpreting; or standing in a war zone surrounded by a throng of Iraqis who had wedged themselves between me and my two guards. Is there more hazard than war zones and demo ranges?
When I returned from Iraq, a former manager told me she’d been in a meeting with upper management, and they mentioned that I was not covered under my insurance plan while over there (her info and encouragement was a main reason for me leaving).
I was in a war zone and if something had happened, would have been stuck with exorbitant medical bills, or my husband without my life insurance.
The corporation took advantage of the patriotism I exuded at the time. That’s what corporations do.
Now, my position is this: Quit sending people to war! For the sake of our military *and citizens across the globe*, just stop.
But if you do, then take care of our vets when they come home. Mental health in particular: Invisible injury is still injury.
And take care of active duty military spouses! It was more stressful when my husband (USAF, Ret.) was overseas than when I was in the field because I knew what was happening to me—I didn’t know what was happening to him.
I’m paying for my service, both military and government contracting, over a lifetime; and throughout my husband’s service, I was paying for his.