Welcome to ACT-S, where sustainable property investment meets opportunity. https://lnkd.in/gDisQXdH At ACT-S Capital Fund, we focus on delivering innovative, responsible property development projects that align with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles. Our goal is to positively impact both the environment and your investment portfolio, offering institutional and overseas investors a transparent, actively managed platform designed for sustainable growth. Sustainability and ESG Mandate: ACT-S Capital Fund is committed to ESG principles that guide our property development projects. These principles are designed to reduce environmental impact, lower construction costs, and enhance property value over time. Our investment strategy incorporates sustainable building practices that focus on energy efficiency, the use of renewable materials, and reducing the carbon footprint of each project. For example, the Genesis project is targeting a 5-star Green Star rating, ensuring that sustainability is embedded into the core of its design and construction. Proven Expertise and Commitment to Performance: Backed by over 15 years of experience into sustainable property development, ACT-S Capital Fund has a strong track record of delivering high-quality projects that meet the financial and environmental objectives of our investors. Each project is subject to stringent sustainability assessments to ensure compliance with ESG standards. The Fund is actively managed under the guidance of our experienced team, ensuring that all investments are aligned with long-term value creation and sustainability goals. DISCLAIMER: The ACT-S Capital Fund (Fund) is a retail managed investment scheme in the form of an Australian unit trust. ACT-S Management Pty Ltd is the investment manager of the Fund (Investment Manager). The Investment Manager is a corporate authorised representative (001309563) of DHF Investment Managers (344486). ACT-S Management Pty Ltd 's authority under its Corporate Authorised Representative Agreement with Vasco Trustees Limited is limited to general advice regarding the Fund only. VASCO Trustees Limited is the responsible entityof the Fund (RE) and the issuer of its Product Disclosure Statement (PDS). The Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination for the product is available on the VASCO Trustees Limited ’s website at https://vascofm.com. You should consider the Product Disclosure Statement in deciding whether to acquire, or to continue to hold the product. #investmentfund #capitalinvestment #investmentopportunity #ESGinvesting #sustainable #sustainableinvesting #investment
ACT-S Capital Fund’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
In 2023, Triodos Investment Management’s assets under management increased to EUR 5.7 billion (end of 2022: EUR 5.5 billion). Compared to the year-end figures of 2022, the total volume of the assets under management increased by 2.8%. Dick van Ommeren, Chair of the Management Board of Triodos Investment Management: “While we are pleased to see our assets under management have returned to an upward trend in 2023, we must also acknowledge that the past year brought challenges. Investor sentiment remained on the cautious side, especially in terms of direct investments in sustainable projects and companies. However, it remains vital that we also continue to invest in unlisted initiatives that are at the forefront of the sustainable transition. Only by combining both listed and direct investments can we really make a difference from the perspective of positive impact.”
Triodos Investment Management in 2023
triodos.smh.re
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Compelling Case for ESG in Real Estate Investment In the dynamic world of real estate investment, funds that embrace strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles are not just leading the way—they’re reaping tangible rewards. Here’s why a robust ESG strategy is more than a moral compass; it’s a competitive edge: 1. Enhanced Risk Management ESG isn’t just about doing good; it’s about smart business. By integrating ESG principles, funds can better identify and mitigate risks associated with environmental, social, and governance issues. This proactive approach safeguards asset values and boosts long-term returns. 2. Operational Excellence Sustainability is synonymous with efficiency. Measures like energy-efficient retrofits and water conservation are not just eco-friendly—they cut costs and bolster net operating income. 3. Magnetic Properties Today’s tenants seek more than just four walls and a roof; they’re drawn to properties that reflect their values. ESG-certified buildings command higher occupancy rates and longer leases, thanks to their green credentials. 4. Capital Magnetism The investor landscape is evolving. There’s a clear pivot towards ESG-focused funds, driven by the promise of superior risk-adjusted returns. 5. Ahead of the Curve Regulatory winds are shifting towards sustainability. Funds with a keen ESG focus are already ahead, ensuring compliance and sidestepping potential fines and reputational damage. The numbers speak for themselves. A study by ANREV and GRESB illustrates a direct correlation between ESG performance and fund returns, with a 0.852% increase in performance for every 10-point rise in ESG scores. Notably, the environmental aspect of ESG shows the strongest link to fund success. Moreover, ESG-minded funds often outshine on industry benchmarks like GRESB, which not only fosters transparency but also cements investor confidence. While we navigate through the complexities of data and metrics, one thing is clear: Real estate funds with a solid ESG framework consistently outperform their less conscientious counterparts. The evidence is compelling—ESG integration is no longer optional; it’s foundational for future-proofing investments.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In 2023, Triodos Investment Management’s assets under management increased to EUR 5.7 billion (end of 2022: EUR 5.5 billion). Compared to the year-end figures of 2022, the total volume of the assets under management increased by 2.8%. Dick van Ommeren, Chair of the Management Board of Triodos Investment Management: “While we are pleased to see our assets under management have returned to an upward trend in 2023, we must also acknowledge that the past year brought challenges. Investor sentiment remained on the cautious side, especially in terms of direct investments in sustainable projects and companies. However, it remains vital that we also continue to invest in unlisted initiatives that are at the forefront of the sustainable transition. Only by combining both listed and direct investments can we really make a difference from the perspective of positive impact.”
Triodos Investment Management in 2023
triodos.smh.re
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In 2023, Triodos Investment Management’s assets under management increased to EUR 5.7 billion (end of 2022: EUR 5.5 billion). Compared to the year-end figures of 2022, the total volume of the assets under management increased by 2.8%. Dick van Ommeren, Chair of the Management Board of Triodos Investment Management: “While we are pleased to see our assets under management have returned to an upward trend in 2023, we must also acknowledge that the past year brought challenges. Investor sentiment remained on the cautious side, especially in terms of direct investments in sustainable projects and companies. However, it remains vital that we also continue to invest in unlisted initiatives that are at the forefront of the sustainable transition. Only by combining both listed and direct investments can we really make a difference from the perspective of positive impact.”
Triodos Investment Management in 2023
triodos.smh.re
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In 2023, Triodos Investment Management’s assets under management increased to EUR 5.7 billion (end of 2022: EUR 5.5 billion). Compared to the year-end figures of 2022, the total volume of the assets under management increased by 2.8%. Dick van Ommeren, Chair of the Management Board of Triodos Investment Management: “While we are pleased to see our assets under management have returned to an upward trend in 2023, we must also acknowledge that the past year brought challenges. Investor sentiment remained on the cautious side, especially in terms of direct investments in sustainable projects and companies. However, it remains vital that we also continue to invest in unlisted initiatives that are at the forefront of the sustainable transition. Only by combining both listed and direct investments can we really make a difference from the perspective of positive impact.”
Triodos Investment Management in 2023
triodos.smh.re
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Sustainability is important to anyone in business - you cannot have a system that collapses upon itself. As regulatory bodies in Europe and the UK tighten rules to ensure funds labeled as "sustainable" meet stricter criteria, the asset management industry points to real advances like increased renewable energy investments as evidence of meaningful transformation. What many would like to see is the extent to which sustainability criteria have been genuinely integrated into the broader asset management industry, and how effectively firms are aligning their investment strategies with these standards.
Asset managers face growing scrutiny over sustainability claims
ft.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Rethinking Sustainable Investing in Asset Management 🌍💰 The asset management industry claims to be all about sustainable investing, but a recent survey shows the reality is quite different. Dirk Jenter and his team surveyed 509 equity portfolio managers to see how much firms’ environmental and social (ES) performance really matters in their investment strategies. The results? A lot of talk, but when it comes to the bottom line, it’s all about profits. Despite the hype, it seems the commitment to truly integrating ES performance into investment decisions is weak. Key Findings from the Survey 📊 Profitability Over Principles: Most portfolio managers, whether managing traditional or sustainable funds, won't sacrifice even a fraction of returns to support ES goals. Their fiduciary duty to clients trumps everything else. Low Priority for ES Performance: When ranking factors that contribute to long-term firm value, managers consistently placed ES performance dead last. They might acknowledge its relevance, but it’s clearly not a priority. Similar Expectations Across Fund Types: Traditional and sustainable fund managers expect similar returns and see strong ES performance as a sign of a well-managed company, not necessarily a key to financial success. Constraints Influence Decision-Making: Many fund managers face ES-related constraints from firm policies or client demands, but these pressures aren’t exclusive to sustainable funds. Both types of funds focus on financial objectives while dealing with outside pressures. Implications for Sustainable Investing 🤔 These findings prompt serious questions about the effectiveness of sustainable investing in driving corporate responsibility: 1. Limited Influence on ES Performance: Don’t expect the asset management industry to lead the charge for better ES performance. Most managers only care about ES considerations when they have financial implications. 2. Misleading Fund Labels: Just because a fund says “sustainable” doesn’t mean it prioritizes social goals. Many sustainable fund managers focus primarily on financial returns, while traditional ones may also consider ES performance if it aligns with profit motives. So, look beyond the label—dive into the actual investment strategies and voting patterns to know what you’re really getting. As Hans points out, sustainability investing often seems to be mostly about marketing. But that cannot be enough—sustainability shouldn’t just be an add-on; it should be a core investment principle. It’s time for real action, not just nice words!
☄️ 🔥 𝐂𝐲𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 (𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞) 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐱. According to this research ( 👉 https://lnkd.in/eJc6ehju), there is virtually no difference between sustainable and other asset managers in the way they treat sustainability topics. A survey conducted by the researchers under fund managers of equity funds (mostly fundamental active investment style, >60% in EU all in secondary markets) shows this clearly. The only positive argument you can make is that all asset managers take (financially material) sustainability factors into account. But that is only financially material for the performance of their funds... 🗨️ "𝙸𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚜, 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍’𝚜 𝚕𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚕, 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝙴𝚂 (environmental and social) 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚘 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚜 𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜. 𝙰𝚗𝚍, 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚜𝚔𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚢’𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐-𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎, 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚋𝚘𝚝𝚑 𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚜 𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚔𝚎𝚍 𝙴𝚂 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎𝚜." Implications: 🟤 Limited Leadership: The asset management industry is unlikely to enhance firms' environmental and social performance, as most fund managers focus on financial returns and will not support below-market sustainability investments. 💰❌ 🟤 Unclear Fund Types: The industry doesn't divide into traditional and sustainable funds. Both types aim for financial returns while facing sustainability constraints, with many viewing some sustainability issues as financially relevant. 📊⚖️ 🟤 Misleading Labels: Fund labels can be deceptive. Many sustainable fund managers prioritise financial returns, and traditional managers may consider sustainability performance if it’s financially significant. Investors should examine stock selections and engagement practices rather than relying on labels. 🔍📈 What can I say. Some (impact) investors do it differently, from selection to management, but it is a niche. The rest is all the same: benchmarks, maximising financial returns and the rest is marketing. https://lnkd.in/eh65epW5
Expectations for the real-world impact of sustainable investing are unrealistic
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Shariah-compliance and green accountability is a dynamic combination. The problem is that portfolio managers may think that the cost-of-capital is lower than it really is for so-called green investments. That misstep may lead to poor allocation decisions.
PMB Investment, Newton Hexon Float New Private Fund
themalaysianreserve.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The CITB Industry Impact Fund has four new priority areas. Registered companies can apply for up to £500,000. One of our new priority areas is net zero. Projects should address the skills and training elements of building for a net zero future. This could include- retrofit of existing structures, sustainable practices on site and sustainable construction processes/better use of materials. Interesting areas: How do sustainable construction processes or the introduction of new materials change a site or certain roles? What about site logistics? What do customers need from construction companies? Can they get the right project management skills? Are trades people confident and comfortable to advise on sustainable options and retrofit projects? Do companies know how they might need to pivot in the future? Do senior managers know what investments they need to make? What about cross cutting issues? When you hear people talking about net zero, they are often talking about things that would make any business better. E.g. more leadership and management training to inform decision making, better team working and communication on site, better information management. Is there any mileage in developing interventions that would work for net zero futures or just a better industry in general? A couple of key issues to be careful of: Current demand- most people accept that net zero building is a necessity, but client demand can be patchy and it’s not at the top of every construction company’s agenda right now. So- we need to think about where the demand is/how to engage company’s who know this is important but aren’t sure what to do about it. CITBs scope order- we can’t fund activities like plumbing and electrical- contact us if you aren’t sure about how our scope could impact your idea and we’ll work through it with you. If you’ve got a bright idea- talk to us, we are here to help you shape your bid and make sure your proposed solution is likely to be fundable. You don't need a perfectly formed master plan for us to start talking.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In 2023, Triodos Investment Management’s assets under management increased to EUR 5.7 billion (end of 2022: EUR 5.5 billion). Compared to the year-end figures of 2022, the total volume of the assets under management increased by 2.8%. Dick van Ommeren, Chair of the Management Board of Triodos Investment Management: “While we are pleased to see our assets under management have returned to an upward trend in 2023, we must also acknowledge that the past year brought challenges. Investor sentiment remained on the cautious side, especially in terms of direct investments in sustainable projects and companies. However, it remains vital that we also continue to invest in unlisted initiatives that are at the forefront of the sustainable transition. Only by combining both listed and direct investments can we really make a difference from the perspective of positive impact.” Read the full press release on our website. #ImpactInvesting #AnnualResults #MakingADifference
Triodos Investment Management in 2023
triodos-im.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
63 followers
WordPress Developer | Digital marketing | Content Writing | Shopify Developer | Freelancer | Search Engines Optimization| Ecommerce Development | Wix Developer
2moInterested