🇳🇱 Arjan Verbeek’s Post

The LTI flow limit from the Bank of England is an immense barrier to many goals of politicians, and even the regulators themselves, which is ironic. Put a barrier against innovation in finance, you put a barrier against innovation itself! Society is connected, at least one of the points should resonate with anyone in the audience. - economic growth is depressed because the LTI cap locks up the housing market, a major part of GDP. - inequality would reduce without the LTI, because more people would have access to home ownership - more competition in the mortgage market, because start up innovators like Perenna would not be subject to restrictions aimed at the large lenders - more consumer choice, because different funding models like Perenna will introduce different mortgage products such a long term fixed rate mortgages - more productive finance, with the LTI limit stopping pension savings being channelled into the domestic economy through different funding models - the LTI limit is a barrier to wider adoption of retrofitting products, needed for our net zero ambitions - removing the LTI would help FTB own their homes, improving affordability - the LTI cap stops the development and introduction of mortgage loans that are appropriate for older people, hit by the cost of living and looking to borrow against their home - the LTI cap forces aspiring homeowners into the shadow economy through help to buy type products, in the end more expensive for borrowers, as well as increasing systemic risk Nobody denies leverage is a risk, but stopping leverage is a bigger risk. Leverage risk needs to be controlled, and other economies are doing that better without an LTI cap. As Tim Shipman wrote: “ .. we have been free to make our own mistakes, and boy have we made them” The Times Tim Shipman Jeremy Hunt HM Treasury Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP The Conservative Party The Labour Party

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics