Robert Thorssen

Biden's secret support for Iran (!!?) --- #intelligence #USA #Biden #Obama #Iran #Israel #Russia #Syria #Iraq #Lebanon #Saudi #Neocon #military #proxies #Contra #weapons #Weaponssystems #Missiles #MiddleEast #WAR #WWIII --- This past Memorial Day, as Americans honoured their war dead, the Biden administration was running interference for an Iranian regime whose Supreme Leader has described “death to America” as his official state policy. A report in the day’s Wall Street Journal described how the US was “pressing European allies to back off plans to rebuke Iran for advances in its nuclear programme”. This followed a confidential report by the International Atomic Energy Agency that assessed Iran has increased its stockpile of enriched uranium to more than 30 times the limit set in the 2015 nuclear deal — enough to produce three to four nuclear weapons within a week, according to experts. Theoretically, the news should have troubled officials in Washington, who often still speak as if they oppose the proliferation of nuclear weapons to rogue states that vow to destroy the US-led international order. So why, then, did the US block the effort led by its allies France and England to censure Iran? For the same underlying reason that has motivated White House policy since October 7: The Biden administration sees Iran as America’s main partner in the Middle East and the lynchpin of US grand strategy. Washington’s de facto alliance with Iran, which began under the Obama administration and was revived by Biden, is the central fact of US foreign policy today. Iran is the decisive factor in most decisions the US makes in the region, including in relation to Israel. Yet White House officials know that stating this directly would create a public-relations disaster. Alas, most Americans stubbornly reject the idea of aligning their country with the Khomeinist state that has killed more than a thousand of their fellow citizens and continues to attack US soldiers and call for their deaths. Indeed, existing policies such as airlifting billions of dollars in cash to Iran and using taxpayer money to subsidise Iranian proxy forces, including Hezbollah and Hamas, would be decidedly unpopular if the government actually acknowledged them. To get around this problem, US officials conceal the main axis of their strategy behind a veil of misdirection and innuendo. Is it an irony that America’s ruling party used deliberate deception to advance its project of US-Iranian alliance, as its leaders led a new crusade to prosecute “Disinformation”? No, it is a political strategy following the old maxim that the best defence is a good offence. [..] ---

The Exodus of Israelis: Seeking New Horizons Amidst Turmoil In recent times, a notable trend has emerged of Israelis leaving their homeland, driven by a confluence of socio-economic and political pressures. The high cost of living, persistent security concerns stemming from the Arab–Israeli conflict, and aspirations for academic and professional advancement are just some of the reasons prompting this exodus. Compounded by recent political shifts within Israel, these factors paint a complex picture of migration. Economic and Personal Motivations Many Israelis face economic hurdles that include an escalating cost of living, which has not been adequately matched by local income levels. This economic strain is augmented by the pursuit of better academic and professional opportunities abroad, making destinations in North America and Europe particularly appealing. The accessibility of dual citizenship for many Israelis facilitates this move, allowing them to transition more smoothly to life in new countries. Political Climate and Migration The current political landscape in Israel has also been a critical factor in this migration trend. The election of a right-wing government and its controversial judicial reforms have sparked fears about the future of Israeli democracy. These apprehensions are rooted in what some perceive as a shift towards authoritarian governance, driving some Israelis to seek more stable and democratic environments. New Homes in the West North America and Europe have emerged as preferred destinations for many emigrating Israelis, as reported by multiple sources. Cities like Barcelona have become new homes for those leaving Israel, with others seeking citizenship in countries like Portugal, Germany, and Poland. This trend underscores a broader pattern of mobility towards Western nations, where many Israelis feel they can secure a better future for themselves and their families. The Broader Implications While precise data on the number of Israelis emigrating remains unclear, the overarching trend indicates a significant movement towards the West. This shift is not only reshaping the demographic landscape of Israel but also reflects broader global migration trends where political instability and economic pressures compel individuals to cross borders in search of safety and stability. The ramifications of this ongoing wave of emigration are profound, both for Israel and for the countries that Israelis choose as their new homes. As this trend continues, it will be important to monitor how these migrations influence the cultural, economic, and political dynamics of the involved regions.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift: A Growing Threat to Biden’s Re-Election Campaign The relationship between U.S. President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has significantly deteriorated amidst the ongoing Gaza conflict. This strain is not only reshaping U.S.-Israel relations but also poses a potential threat to Biden’s 2024 re-election bid. The Fallout The tension reached a critical point following a tragic Israeli airstrike that killed seven humanitarian aid workers in Gaza. President Biden has publicly pressured Netanyahu to mitigate civilian harm and address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Biden warned that without concrete steps from Israel, the U.S. might reconsider its policy toward the country​ (The Jerusalem Post)​​ (Jewish Insider)​. Netanyahu's government accused the Biden administration of attempting to undermine his leadership, further deepening the rift​ (The Jerusalem Post)​. This diplomatic friction has provided Republicans with ammunition to criticize Biden’s approach to Israel, framing it as a sign of weak support for a key ally. Political Ramifications The fallout is not just limited to international diplomacy but extends into the domestic political arena. Prominent Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, have voiced concerns about Netanyahu’s leadership, reflecting internal party divisions on Israel policy. Schumer’s call for new elections in Israel highlights the growing frustration within the Democratic Party and signals a shift from unconditional support to a more conditional approach​(The Jerusalem Post)​. This internal discord and perceived weakening of U.S.-Israel ties could alienate key voter demographics, including Jewish Americans and pro-Israel advocates, who played a crucial role in Biden’s 2020 victory. Additionally, Republican opponents, particularly those aligned with former President Donald Trump, are leveraging this issue to bolster their campaigns by presenting themselves as staunch defenders of Israel​ (The Jerusalem Post)​​ (Jewish Insider)​. Conclusion The Biden-Netanyahu fallout represents a significant challenge for President Biden as he seeks re-election. The evolving U.S. policy towards Israel amidst the Gaza conflict not only impacts international relations but also carries substantial domestic political risks. As the 2024 election approaches, how Biden navigates this complex issue could be a determining factor in his bid to secure a second term. #Hashtags: #Biden2024 #Netanyahu #USIsraelRelations #GazaConflict #Election2024 #ForeignPolicy #DemocraticParty #RepublicanParty

Israel's Growing Isolation "Nobody likes us, so it makes no difference to us. We will keep doing what we are doing." This defiant attitude within Israel and among some American Jews is increasingly being tested as Israel faces growing international isolation and criticism. This stance, which suggests a disregard for international opinion and law, is becoming less tenable in the face of mounting global censure and the potential long-term consequences for both Israel and the United States. International Criticism and Legal Challenges: Israel's military actions in Gaza have led to significant international backlash. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) recently issued a ruling demanding Israel halt its offensive in Gaza, further isolating the country on the global stage. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has also pursued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for alleged war crimes, adding to Israel's pariah status. Declining Public Support in the West: Public support for Israel is waning, particularly among younger generations in Western countries. Surveys indicate that younger Americans and Europeans are increasingly sympathetic to the Palestinian cause and critical of Israeli policies. This shift in public opinion is mirrored in political circles, with growing calls within the U.S. Congress to condition military aid to Israel on its adherence to human rights standards. Global South and Emerging Economies: Countries in the Global South, including several in Latin America and Africa, have taken strong stances against Israel's actions, with some even severing diplomatic ties. The broader geopolitical shift towards emerging economies, which generally hold less favorable views of Israel, suggests that Israel's international standing could continue to deteriorate over time. Impact on U.S. Support and Global Standing U.S. Domestic and International Pressure: The Biden administration faces increasing pressure both domestically and internationally to reassess its unconditional support for Israel. This pressure is evident in the growing calls for a ceasefire and humanitarian aid to Gaza from various political factions within the U.S. The U.S.'s unwavering support for Israel has led to accusations of double standards, particularly when contrasted with its stance on other international conflicts, such as Ukraine. This perceived hypocrisy is damaging America's global reputation and its ability to lead on human rights issues. Strategic and Political Costs: The U.S. risks isolating itself from key international partners and allies by continuing to support Israel unconditionally. This isolation is already evident in the U.N., where the U.S. has repeatedly used its veto power to block resolutions critical of Israel, often standing alone against the rest of the Security Council. The ongoing conflict and the U.S.'s support for Israel are also complicating its relationships with countries in the Middle Eas

Israel’s Closure of Al Jazeera The Tug of War Over Media Freedom ~~~ In a world where information is power, the freedom of the press is a cornerstone of democracy and transparency. However, this freedom is not absolute and can be subject to state control, especially in regions embroiled in conflict. A stark example of this tension is Israel’s decision to close Al Jazeera’s operations within its borders. Suppression or Protection? ~~~ Israel’s move to shut down Al Jazeera has sparked a heated debate on the suppression of the free press. I believe that this act undermines the fundamental right to freedom of speech and the media’s role as a watchdog in conflict zones. The closure of Al Jazeera, a significant voice in the Middle East, exemplifies the delicate balance between national security and press freedom. Al Jazeera’s Closure: A Human Rights Debate ~~~ The unanimous vote by the Israeli government to cease Al Jazeera’s activities has been met with staunch opposition from the network, which views the decision as a human rights infringement and an attack on the public’s right to information. In my opinion, this closure is not just about a single organization; it’s a symbol of the ongoing struggle for media freedom in areas of unrest. Bias Versus Objectivity ~~~ Accusations of bias and incitement have been levied against Al Jazeera by Israeli officials, pointing to a perceived slant in the network’s reporting. Al Jazeera refutes these claims, maintaining its adherence to professional journalistic standards. It is easy to see that this controversy underscores the challenges media outlets face in reporting objectively while navigating political sensitivities. Gaza’s Information Blackout ~~~ Al Jazeera has been pivotal in providing on-the-ground coverage from Gaza, often shining a light on stories that would otherwise remain in the shadows. The network’s absence raises serious concerns in my mind about the transparency and completeness of the narrative emerging from this tumultuous region. What is Israel trying to hide? A Global Concern ~~~ The international community has watched with concern as the situation unfolds, recognizing the broader implications for press freedom worldwide. I am a staunch believer that the closure of Al Jazeera is more than a local issue; it’s a reflection of the global struggle for an open and free media landscape. ~~~ Israel’s decision to shut down Al Jazeera’s operations is a complex issue that sits at the intersection of media freedom, state sovereignty, and conflict reporting. It highlights the vital role of the press in promoting transparency and accountability, particularly in areas of conflict. Let me be clear, as I navigate this intricate debate, it’s essential to maintain an open mind and critically assess the multifaceted perspectives involved. The story of Al Jazeera in Israel is not just about a network; it’s about the ongoing battle for the soul of the free press. What are your thoughts?

#DirtyHarris is a disciple of #Nobama and #GenocideJoe complete and absolute #NeoCapitalists #Neoliberals corporate stooges, #WarMongers so she'll put half of the world on fire more than all the other #DemsSoHypocrite and #GOPsoHypocrite https://lnkd.in/e-pQ2Yvn

**Statement Title: Demand for the Confiscation of Movable and Immovable Assets of the State of Israel** **To: His Excellency Mr. Muhammad Shia al-Sudani, Prime Minister of Iraq** **Introduction:** We, the loyal sons of the Iraqi people, address you with a call to all relevant authorities in the Iraqi state, especially to the government and the Prime Minister, to demand urgent and decisive actions for the confiscation of movable and immovable assets of the State of Israel. **Reasons:** This request comes as a response to the aggressive Israeli policies and its positions against human and Arab rights. The continued violations of human rights and international laws by Israel necessitate serious steps from us to protect our national interests. **Demand:** 1. **Comprehensive Review:** We demand a comprehensive review of the assets owned by the State of Israel, whether located on Iraqi territory or through institutions and companies operating illegally. 2. **International Coordination:** We call on the Iraqi government to coordinate with the international community to pressure Israel and work towards a collective stance to confront its violations. 3. **Necessary Legislation:** Clear national legislation must be established to regulate the confiscation of these assets and define the mechanisms for enforcement and verification of their sources. **Conclusion:** The confiscation of movable and immovable assets of the State of Israel is not merely a legal step, but a message reaffirming our support for human rights and rejection of aggression. We urge the government to take these urgent steps to ensure the sovereignty of Iraq and achieve justice. #Demand_for_the_Confiscation_of_Movable_and_Immovable_Assets_of_the_State_of_Israel *Iraqi Inventor* *Ghzwann Al-Azara* *2024/12/1*

🔶CEASEFIRE (LEBANON) LEAKS - Real time from Israel ISRAEL REALTIME - Connecting to Israel in Realtime 🔸LEAKED LEBANON / HEBZOLLAH CEASEFIRE TERMS.. •⁠ ⁠ceasefire •⁠ ⁠Implementation of Resolution 1701 •⁠ ⁠Hezbollah's retreat beyond the Litani River •⁠ ⁠withdrawal of Israeli forces from the villages they occupied •⁠ ⁠the return of the displaced Lebanese •⁠ ⁠The return of the Israelis to the north The draft includes the strengthening of the Lebanese military forces and UNIFIL and the establishment of an American-French-British international committee with an Arab country (it is not clear at the moment which country this is) whose role it is to directly monitor the implementation of Resolution 1701 by both sides. This includes granting the right to self-defense to both sides, while granting Israel extensive freedom in the interpretation of "right" to the point of military intervention to deal with any violation of the resolution by Hezbollah south of Litani that may also extend to Lebanese territory, in addition to the activation of UNIFIL forces and the Lebanese army to prevent Hezbollah from re-arming . 🔸THE PROCESS .. Tomorrow US envoy Amos Hochstein lands in Beirut and meets with Lebanese speaker Navia Berry and Prime Minister Mikati. .. Wednesday Arrival of Amos Hochstein in Israel with the draft signed by the Lebanese (but NOT by Hezbollah or Iran). .. Thursday Amos Hochstein arrives in Paris, meets with President Macron, holds a press conference and announces a ceasefire. 🔸DETAILS THAT MATTER 2 generals are supposed to monitor the implementation. The expansion of the clause that allows Israel to "attack in Lebanon" if it detects an incident related to the Hezbollah organization that requires a response IS that this will not happen immediately. That is, Israel will not be able to attack immediately however it discovers a violation of the agreement, but Israel will have to transfer to those generals that there is a violation of the agreement and they will have to examine it, each violation individually, only after they declare it a violation will Israel have the right to respond. 🔸ANALYSTS SAY .. A lot of capability remains in the hands of Hezbollah. .. With these terms it will be impossible to stop Hezbollah from re-arming. 🔸THE HEZBOLLAH GAME The Lebanese Al-Akhbar newspaper (affiliated with Hezbollah) reports that Hezbollah has decided to follow the strategy of "positive ambiguity" in everything related to the agreement. That is, positive to move towards an agreement and in the next step details - opposition to Israeli freedom of action, determining the mandate of the supervisory committee, opposition to the role of Britain and Germany, in addition not only to opposition to Israeli freedom of action but also to active action of international bodies (aka UNIFIL or others).