Katie Staba

Excellent article by Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC highlighting the practical uses of deposition summaries and introduction of the #AI summary tool and benefits. Message me here or [email protected] for a demo of our Intelligent Summary+!

6

A recent article by Abigail Adcox for The National Law Journal delves into the current state of lateral partner hiring in Washington, D.C., referencing Macrae’s latest Partner Trends data. While other key legal markets like New York and London have seen an uptick in moves, D.C. has faced a 15% decline in lateral partner hiring at Am Law 50 and Magic Circle firms during the first three quarters of 2024. Justine Donahue, a partner in our Washington, D.C. office, commented on this trend, noting, “It could be one of those circumstances where things are in the pipeline at these firms, they just haven't [gotten] to the point where hires have been announced.” The report highlights significant shifts in D.C.'s hiring landscape: practice areas like antitrust, tax, and litigation have seen slower movement, while investment management/funds and white-collar defense have experienced notable growth. Read the full article here*: https://lnkd.in/dHqCrXQE *Note this does sit behind a pay wall and a subscription may be needed to read the full article.

15

New Ruling on Punitive Damages and Attorney Fees in California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) Case As Thompson Hine has previously reported, the recent surge of privacy claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) related to using website cookies, pixels, and web beacons continues to impact a several sectors. It has been especially harmful to small businesses. On July 15, Judge Rolf Treu ruled on a preliminary motion in a CIPA lawsuit and concluded that the plaintiff could potentially recover punitive damages and attorney fees. Although this case does not address the merits of whether website tracking technologies are considered pen registers or trap and trace devices under CIPA, plaintiffs may rely on it to demand larger awards and settlements in their CIPA actions. Businesses that deploy these types of online tracking technologies should immediately reassess the legal terms governing the use of their websites and whether they contain favorable dispute resolution provisions, such as remedies available for claims arising from a consumer’s use of the website. View full update here ➡ https://bit.ly/3WjOO3x Steven Stransky I Jennifer Adler #DataPrivacy #PrivacyLaw #ThompsonHine #California

1

The United States Court of Appeals 5th Circuit just announced it will not adopt a proposed rule specifically requiring disclosure and other requirements for attorneys who use AI as part of their practice. Upon reflection, and based upon a lot of negative feedback on the proposed rule, they recognized that existing rules already cover the same situations. Specifically, attorneys are enforceably required to stand behind the truthfulness and accuracy of court filings. However, the court admonished litigants and lawyers alike that “I used AI” will not be an acceptable excuse for violating existing rules! Here is the formal notice from the court: https://lnkd.in/gJWyEyxg For color, here also are some recent news articles on this announcement: * Reuters: https://lnkd.in/gJmjWSqv * Bloomberg Law: https://lnkd.in/gaVqCkHi And, since I have it at hand, for your convenience, here is the full statement by the court: “The court, having considered the proposed rule, the accompanying comments, and the use of artificial intelligence in the legal practice, has decided not to adopt a special rule regarding the use of artificial intelligence in drafting briefs at this time. Parties and counsel are reminded of their duties regarding their filings before the court under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(b)(1)(B). Parties and counsel are responsible for ensuring that their filings with the court, including briefs, shall be carefully checked for truthfulness and accuracy as the rules already require. “I used AI” will not be an excuse for an otherwise sanctionable offense.” Personally, I think this court got it right. To the extent existing rules cover situations arising from use (or misuse) or AI, it is a good idea to apply those rules first before seeking to make more rules. In the event of demonstrable failures of existing rules, then perhaps it will be more practical to craft new rules to address the gaps that have been revealed. But it is, apparently, a very good idea to sound the alarm far and wide, loud and clear: sometimes generative AI provides incorrect or otherwise unsuitable information and it remains the duty of the attorney (among others) to carefully review and stand behind any work they pass forward. That concludes my public service announcement for today :-)

121

20 Comments

American Privacy Rights Act (APRA) Update  Lawmakers released a revised version of the American Privacy Rights Act (APRA), moving it out of subcommittee unanimously to the full Energy and Commerce Committee on May 23.  APRA aims to establish federal data privacy laws but includes preemption provisions that override stronger state protections like those in California.  Average Internet use is nearly seven hours daily, generating significant amounts of data and underscoring the need for robust privacy legislation.  APRA revisions expanded from 53 to 174 pages, yet concerns remain about preemption, sensitive information, profiling, and government service provider protections. Key Changes: Ø Targeted Advertising : The bill allows broader data collection for targeted ads, raising concerns about potential loopholes. Ø Child Protections : Elements of COPPA 2.0 were included, but protections for minors are seen as insufficient. Ø Data Deletion : Adds a mechanism for deleting data not directly collected by brokers, akin to California's “Delete Act.” § Despite improvements, APRA’s preemption clause could limit states' abilities to enforce stronger privacy laws, reducing the authority of state agencies and attorneys general. § The journey for APRA is ongoing, with further legislative hurdles before potential presidential approval. Stay informed on developments. Source: https://lnkd.in/gC7TBaXR

7

1 Comment

“Incorporating visuals into #appellate briefs,” writes FBT attorney Griffin Terry Sumner, “is a game-changer, offering a breath of fresh air to text-weary eyes and condensing complex ideas into a single, powerful impression.” Still, a balance must be struck between tactics and tact, imagery and argumentation. Consider following these simple rules when preparing your next legal brief: https://lnkd.in/gWHUB-NM.  #AppellateLaw #LegalWriting #VisualPersuasion #LegalBriefs #DataVisualization #LitigationStrategy #PersuasiveWriting

10

Unclear roles and responsiblities. Stress related to finger pointing and accountability confusion. Burn-out. These things are much more common in eDiscovery, legal operations, and cross-functional legal technology teams than they need to be. Come to my workshop December 3rd on how to use GOSP operating models to create thoughtful work structures in Legal and eDiscovery. GOSP stands for Governance, Oversight, Support, and Perform and is a tool which can be used to provide clarity for internal, external, and hierarchical teams performing day-to-day operations. Borrowed from the energy industry, I have used GOSP models for the last ten years to help legal teams through largescale transformative changes such as mergers, acquisition, company separation, in-sourcing, out-sourcing, process revision, and system replacement. GOSP models help provide clarity, reducing the confusion, finger-pointing, fear and burn-out which can ensue when roles and responsibilities are unclear. Registration link in comments. This EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model workshop is a continuation of our panel at Electronic Discovery Institute summit with The Mind-Budget Connection™. This is also a topic some of us discussed a few months back in one of Jenn McCarron’s excellent posts; Excellent tips and link to that post in comments for those who may not have time for a workshop. Amy Sellars - CEDS Jill Rorem (Elden) Kaylee Walstad Mary Mack, CISSP

35

9 Comments

Your Guide to Jurisdictional Insights Across 13 Critical Areas. Simple. Comparative. Actionable. Legal research shouldn’t be a guessing game. With GRI’s Insights, it’s clear, simple, and effective. Key Features: In-Depth Analysis: Explore jurisdictional insights across 13 critical work areas, presented in an easy-to-digest FAQ format. Compare Across Jurisdictions: Effortlessly compare regulations across different regions to inform your strategies. And as always with GRI: Collaborative Edge: Share insights with a click, keeping your team in the loop. Effortless Organization: Highlight, tag, and organize your research for quick access. Precision Targeting: Find what you need with pinpoint accuracy. Empower your decision-making with GRI’s in-depth insights. See how GRI’s insights can transform your legal strategy. Visit https://lnkd.in/gZmkUPim today. #JurisdictionalInsights #LegalAnalysis #GRI

3

Mike Hammer and Dr. Jing Liu, Ph.D. have been quoted in the Law360 article, “Why Dickinson Wright Launched IP-Focused San Diego Shop.” Both highlight the multiple areas of opportunity – including life sciences – which Dickinson Wright is tapping into by opening its San Diego office. Read the full article here: https://bit.ly/3NIwQnz #iplaw #biotechlaw #lifesciences

10

1 Comment

On September 30, litigation counsel Anna Gressel will participate in a panel, “The Extremely Large Elephant In the Room: The Overabundance of Content in the Age of AI,” as part of The Copyright Society’s Copyright and Technology Conference. Learn more: https://lnkd.in/etK_-JZy #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #DigitalTechnology

112

2 Comments

Join The Masters Conference Legal in Chicago for ProSearch panel on "Metrics That Matter: Measuring the Effectiveness of a Modern Discovery Program". The panelists, Joe Pirrotta, Noah Miller, Stephanie Clerkin, CEDS, RCA, and Aaron B. Bath, CEDS will discuss integration of business acumen into legal practices. Legal professionals will be equipped with the knowledge and tools to transform their eDiscovery programs into strategic assets that drive efficiency, mitigate risk, and deliver unparalleled value to their organizations. #ediscovery #legaltech #legaltechsolutions #legaltechnology #legaltechnologysolutions #legal #moderndata  

27

4 Comments

How did the Kirkland partner video get leaked is the question we’re asking ourselves. Some are recalling the infamous ‘Claire Swire email’ which involved a Norton Rose lawyer from way back at the dawn of time in 2000 and the one too from a CC lawyer back in 2003. *All articles and videos can be found in the comments section. Clifford Chance Adopts US-Style Bonus System for Associates: Clifford Chance has revamped its bonus system for UK associates to align more closely with those offered by US firms, according to The Lawyer . The new system, introduced last month, rewards associates more when they are in higher demand, with bonuses linked to the number of hours billed. This US-style focus on billables marks a departure from the ‘no target-hours culture’ prevalent at many UK firms. Clyde & Co Boosts Revenue by 10%: Clyde & Co has reported strong financial results for the past year, with revenue growing by 10% to £845 million. Profit per equity partner (PEP) increased by 4% to £739,000. The firm attributed its growth to success across various practice areas, emphasizing its "sector-focused, geographically hedged" model. Over the year, Clyde & Co added 32 new partners through lateral hires and internal promotions. Kirkland & Ellis Partner Video Goes Viral in the City: A video leaked to RollOnFriday shows two Kirkland & Ellis partners in London mocking a fellow partner during a work call, culminating in him knocking over a bottle of whisky. The footage, recorded in Kirkland's London office in the Gherkin, is circulating among City lawyers. In the video, the partner gives the middle finger to the person filming but nearly drops a bottle of Macallan whisky before catching it. Reactions in the comments are mixed. One top comment expressed sympathy, saying, "can't believe anyone leaked this… poor guy," while another suggested, "I'd be sacking this bunch of jokers. You know this is just the tip of the iceberg." Partner's 4,000 Hours Help Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Hit $200 Million Mark: Sullivan & Cromwell’s fees for the ongoing bankruptcy of cryptocurrency exchange FTX have reached $200 million, largely thanks to the efforts of a single partner. Litigation partner Brian Glueckstein has averaged 11 hours a day, five days a week, for 18 months, billing more than 4,000 hours at a rate of $2,375 per hour, amounting to $9.5 million. Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers have collectively billed over 168,000 hours on the matter so far, reports Reuters. CC: Non-Billable

1

3 Comments

CDF Partner Sander van der Heide recently authored the article "How California Ruling Alters Worker Arbitration Agreement Enforcement" for Law360's Expert Analysis. Read the attached article to learn the key takeaways from this decision. #cdflaborlaw #arbitrationagreements #courtdecisions #caemplaws

3

1 Comment