Bruce Friedrich

Bruce Friedrich

Washington, District of Columbia, United States
32K followers 500+ connections

About

Bruce Friedrich is the founder and president of the Good Food Institute (GFI), a global…

Articles by Bruce

  • The Future of Meat--Conference at UC Berkeley

    The Future of Meat--Conference at UC Berkeley

    It was 5 years ago this August that Dr. Mark Post served up the world’s first real hamburger that didn’t require…

    10 Comments

Activity

Join now to see all activity

Experience

  • The Good Food Institute Graphic
  • -

    District of Columbia, United States

  • -

    São Paulo, Brazil

  • -

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

  • -

    Singapore

  • -

    Tel Aviv, Israel

  • -

    Brussels, Brussels Region, Belgium

  • -

    Washington D.C. Metro Area

  • -

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • -

    Washington D.C. Metro Area

  • -

    Washington, D.C.

Education

  • Georgetown University Law Center Graphic

    Georgetown University Law Center

    Activities and Societies: magna cum laude; Order of the Coif; top 2% by GPA; 5 CALI awards for top grade in section

    Seven articles published in law journals
    Top Grade in Class: Environmental Law, Nonprofit Law, Food Law, Presentation Skills for Lawyers, Recent Books on the Constitution

  • Phi Beta Kappa & Mortar Board honor societies
    Gilbert Award for best original research in economics (one/year)
    Joyce Foundation Grant for summer research (two/year)

Publications

  • The Economics of Sustainable Food, ed. Nicoletta Batini

    Island Press

    Steve Kaufman, M.D., and I have a chapter in this book, which focuses on the need for governments to fund plant-based and cultivated meat R&D.

    Producing food industrially like we do today causes tremendous global economic losses in terms of malnutrition, diseases, and environmental degradation. But because the food industry does not bear those costs and the price tag for these losses does not show up at the grocery store, it is too often ignored by economists and…

    Steve Kaufman, M.D., and I have a chapter in this book, which focuses on the need for governments to fund plant-based and cultivated meat R&D.

    Producing food industrially like we do today causes tremendous global economic losses in terms of malnutrition, diseases, and environmental degradation. But because the food industry does not bear those costs and the price tag for these losses does not show up at the grocery store, it is too often ignored by economists and policymakers.

    The Economics of Sustainable Food details the true cost of food for people and the planet. It illustrates how to transform our broken system, alleviating its severe financial and human burden. The key is smart macroeconomic policy that moves us toward methods that protect the environment like regenerative land and sea farming, low-impact urban farming, and alternative protein farming, and toward healthy diets. The book’s multidisciplinary team of authors lay out detailed fiscal and trade policies, as well as structural reforms, to achieve those goals.

    In the years ahead, few issues will be more important for individual prosperity and the global economy than the way we produce our food and what food we eat. This roadmap for reform is an invaluable resource to help global policymakers improve countless lives.

    See publication
  • Moo's Law (foreword by Bruce Friedrich)

    Harriman House

    Moo’s Law is the latest title from successful investor Jim Mellon to help readers understand the investment landscape in cultivated meat.

    Jim has a vision that within the next couple of decades world agriculture will be radically transformed by the advent of cultivated meat technology. This book grounds the reader in why such an advancement is absolutely necessary and informs them of the investments they could make to become part of the New Agricultural Revolution themselves. The…

    Moo’s Law is the latest title from successful investor Jim Mellon to help readers understand the investment landscape in cultivated meat.

    Jim has a vision that within the next couple of decades world agriculture will be radically transformed by the advent of cultivated meat technology. This book grounds the reader in why such an advancement is absolutely necessary and informs them of the investments they could make to become part of the New Agricultural Revolution themselves. The harrowing effects on our environment, animal cruelty in food and fashion, and the struggling ability to feed the world’s ever growing population means gives us no choice but to grow meat in labs or derive our proteins from plant-based sources. Once price parity with conventional meats is reached, there will be no turning back — this is Moo’s Law™.

    See publication
  • The Future of Meat Without Animals

    Rowman & Littlefield

    Chapter 7: The future of animals, the future of food

    This volume examines conceptual and cultural opportunities, entanglements, and pitfalls in moving global meat, egg, and dairy consumption toward plant-based and cellular agriculture. Beyond surface tensions of “meatless meat” and “animal-free flesh,” deeper conflicts proliferate around naturalized accounts of human identity and meat consumption, as well as the linkage of protein with colonial power and gender oppression. What visions…

    Chapter 7: The future of animals, the future of food

    This volume examines conceptual and cultural opportunities, entanglements, and pitfalls in moving global meat, egg, and dairy consumption toward plant-based and cellular agriculture. Beyond surface tensions of “meatless meat” and “animal-free flesh,” deeper conflicts proliferate around naturalized accounts of human identity and meat consumption, as well as the linkage of protein with colonial power and gender oppression. What visions and technologies can disrupt modern agriculture? What economic and marketing channels are required to scale these products? What beings and ecosystems remain implicated in a livestock-free food system?

    See publication
  • Ritual Slaughter in the “Ritual Bubble”: Restoring the Wall of Separation between Church and State

    Vermont Journal of Environmental Law

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 17 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 222 (and linked from the title). Abstract: The Humane Slaughter Act of 1958 (HMSA) includes an exemption for ritual slaughter, which is defined by the Act as “a method of slaughter whereby the animal suffers loss of consciousness by anemia of the brain caused by the simultaneous and instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument.” In their execution of the law, the United States Department of Agriculture has created a…

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 17 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 222 (and linked from the title). Abstract: The Humane Slaughter Act of 1958 (HMSA) includes an exemption for ritual slaughter, which is defined by the Act as “a method of slaughter whereby the animal suffers loss of consciousness by anemia of the brain caused by the simultaneous and instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument.” In their execution of the law, the United States Department of Agriculture has created a “ritual bubble,” during which it says that its own inspectors have no authority at all to ensure that animals are humanely treated. USDA’s refusal to regulate ritual slaughter in that bubble cannot be reconciled with the humane intention of the federal slaughter law, and it also cannot be reconciled with the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. In part one of this paper, I explain the statutory and regulatory scheme that applies to ritual slaughter, examine the science behind the ritual exemption to the humane slaughter requirement, and consider a real-life controversy over cruelty at a U.S. kosher slaughterhouse revealed by an undercover investigation. In part two, I argue that the ritual slaughter exemption as interpreted by USDA violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. In part three, I suggest that the best way forward on ritual slaughter is for USDA to promulgate regulations to require that it is conducted as humanely as possible. This solution would preserve the ritual slaughter exemption, thus not inhibiting religious freedom, while removing most of the Establishment Clause problems that are presented by USDA’s current interpretation of the law.

    See publication
  • When the Regulators Refuse to Regulate: Pervasive USDA Underenforcement of the Humane Slaughter Act

    Georgetown Law Journal

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 104 Geo. L.J. 197 (and linked from the title). Abstract: The Humane Methods of Livestock Slaughter Act (HMSA) declares that it is “the policy of the United States that the slaughtering of livestock and the handling of livestock in connection with slaughter shall be carried out only by humane methods.” Unfortunately, the HMSA is pervasively under-enforced, because the agency charged with administering it does an almost unfathomably inadequate job of doing so…

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 104 Geo. L.J. 197 (and linked from the title). Abstract: The Humane Methods of Livestock Slaughter Act (HMSA) declares that it is “the policy of the United States that the slaughtering of livestock and the handling of livestock in connection with slaughter shall be carried out only by humane methods.” Unfortunately, the HMSA is pervasively under-enforced, because the agency charged with administering it does an almost unfathomably inadequate job of doing so. This article: 1) briefly explains the factual and legal background of humane slaughter in the United States; 2) reviews government reports and undercover investigations that prove that USDA is not enforcing the law; 3) considers common theories that are deployed as explanations for an agency that is failing in its statutory mandate, and suggests a new one; and 4) explores some possible ways forward on the issue of humane slaughter.

    See publication
  • Still in the Jungle: Poultry Slaughter and the USDA

    NYU Law Environmental Law Journal

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 23 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 245 (and linked from the title), this article argues that poultry should be given protection by the USDA under the Humane Slaughter Act and the Federal Meat Inspection Act.

    See publication
  • The Church of Animal Liberation: Animal Rights as “Religion” Under the Free Exercise Clause

    Animal Law Review

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 21 Animal L. 65 (and linked from the title), this article argues that a belief in animal liberation constitutes religion under constitutional jurisprudence interpreting the Free Exercise Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Full article is attached.

    See publication
  • Meat Labeling through the Looking Glass

    Animal Law Review

    Available on Westlaw or Lexis at 20 Animal L. 79 (and linked from the title), this Article argues that consumers should be able to pursue state law claims based on fraudulent animal welfare labels on packages of meat, despite the preemption clause contained in the Federal Meat Inspection Act.

    See publication
  • Eating Animals (Jonathan Safran Foer)

    Back Bay Books

    I contributed a short (5 pages) reflection, "She Knows Better," on whether meat consumption can ever be humane to this powerful book by Jonathan Safran Foer.

    Other authors
    • Jonathan Safran Foer
    See publication
  • Coming Home to Roost: How the Chicken Industry Hurts Chickens, Humans, and the Environment

    Animal Law Review

    Published in the Animal Law Review and linked from the title. Abstract: The chicken industry is harming animals, befouling our environment, exploiting farmers and workers, and harming human health. In this article, we discuss the harms and some of the solutions. In Part I, we discuss animal welfare, both on the farm and at slaughter. In Part II, we discuss the environment, both local and global. In Part III, we discuss human rights, with a focus on chicken growers, slaughterhouse workers, and…

    Published in the Animal Law Review and linked from the title. Abstract: The chicken industry is harming animals, befouling our environment, exploiting farmers and workers, and harming human health. In this article, we discuss the harms and some of the solutions. In Part I, we discuss animal welfare, both on the farm and at slaughter. In Part II, we discuss the environment, both local and global. In Part III, we discuss human rights, with a focus on chicken growers, slaughterhouse workers, and the global poor. In Part IV, we discuss the effect of chicken consumption on human health. In each of our first four sections, we offer a few examples of actions that creative lawyers are taking in an effort to mitigate some of the discussed harm. Finally, in Part V, we discuss our belief that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is ‘captured’ by the industries it is supposed to regulate, leading to under-regulation. We conclude that while the tireless efforts of lawyers, activists, and organizations to ameliorate industry and agency failures are critical, the best that can be done through litigation and other forms of policy action is to mitigate the harm caused by the poultry industry.

    Other authors
    See publication
  • In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave

    Wiley-Blackwell

    I contributed a chapter on advocacy, titled "Effective Advocacy: Stealing from the Corporate Playbook," to this book of animal rights essays, which was edited by Peter Singer.

    Other authors
    • Peter Singer
    See publication

More activity by Bruce

View Bruce’s full profile

  • See who you know in common
  • Get introduced
  • Contact Bruce directly
Join to view full profile

Other similar profiles

Explore collaborative articles

We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.

Explore More

Others named Bruce Friedrich in United States

Add new skills with these courses