The BATTT Coalition took its collective voice to Capitol Hill this week as it engages with bipartisan members of Congress and key committee staff to advocate for tax reforms that secure and grow the domestic battery supply chain for defense systems, energy storage, electric vehicles, and other applications that are critical to ensuring U.S. economic competitiveness and national security.
The coalition, established in August, represents the domestic battery upstream supply chain in extraction, synthesis, processing, and recycling to produce battery-grade and critical materials for lithium-ion batteries.
“On both sides of the aisle, we saw staff members that understood the national security implications of not having a domestic battery supply chain,” Ross Kirschner, general counsel at Mitra Chem, told reporters on Thursday, as James Bikales at POLITICO Pro reported.
“The first time that we started talking about critical minerals was under the first Trump administration. They liked it. Then the Biden administration liked it and put some money behind it," said Carmen Rene, CPA, chief financial officer for EnergySource Minerals, per NOTUS' Anna Kramer. "I find strong reason to believe that the Trump administration will continue to like it, but I think with a focus on national security, really on the race to be the first, the best, the strongest."
BATT's executive director, Samm Gillard, said the coalition is also seeking to confer with the incoming administration's transition team to discuss its tax priorities and urge the incoming administration to distribute remaining grant money from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law that supports the industry.
BATT looks forward to continuing to inform the unfolding debate as the Trump administration and Congress begin crafting a tax reform package that supports vibrant domestic industries and ensures the United States' technological advantage over our competitors.
#technology #defense #manufacturing #energy #competitiveness #jobs #supplychain #nationalsecurity #energyindependence
Since Trump was elected, I've been meeting with the important clean energy players to learn how they're prepping for the coming administration. "Climate change" and "energy transition" will obviously be taboo phrases. But the climate policies underneath those phrases? Those might actually be saved, if they're talked about in terms of "national security," "supply chains," and "China."
Here's my latest for NOTUS, based on conversations with the BATT Coalition, several Hogan Lovells attorneys, Harrison Godfrey at Advanced Energy United, Jackson Morris at the NRDC, Sheila Olmstead at Cornell, Congressman Scott Peters, and many others who've hosted meetings these last few weeks to try to game out strategy in the coming Trump administration.
Why the Energy Industry Doesn’t Think Trump Will Unravel All of Biden’s Climate Legacy
notus.org