I am a solid software engineer with .Net stacks . At work,I collaborate ,create and develop Enterprise Web application systems. Now I am exploring new jobs to be a good professional software engineer. I am a professional software engineer but also an ICT Trainer (EWAD) Course,Essential of Database Management & SQL programming,Programming Fundamentals Concept with Java and social contribution about database management technologies. You can check my social contribution Youtube videos at this URL : https://www.youtube.com/@prodevmm

Addressing disagreements among stakeholders over system security requires negotiation skills, an understanding of business priorities, and communication techniques to mediate often opposing positions, especially between stakeholders with different objectives. Use a risk assessment approach to show which risks are acceptable and which require priority interventions. Stakeholders will be more likely to compromise when they see decisions based on a quantitative risk analysis. Organize a risk assessment workshop to classify risks according to probability and impact, involving stakeholders in the assessment process. Addressing and resolving conflicts over security issues is complex, but these strategies can help find effective compromise.

1. "System Security For Us" a) Why System Security for us b) What is System Security for us - Identify the verticals and horizontals - Assess internally the impact External expert review and complete the draft of "System Security For Us!" 2. How System Security? Once we have the initial clarity on the placement and need, we can discuss the step by step approach to get it deployed. [Personally I feel, this is more technical in nature and should not have too much of conflict!] 3. Refine time to time and maintain. The "System Security For Us" to be reviewed time to time and maintain. It is better to revisit the root cause of the conflict. In my experience, more often it happens due to the lack of clarity on "Why and what we want!"

I have found that this problem is often the result of security being an afterthought or thought of as unnecessary. With this mindset spending time, money and effort on security becomes unreasonable. Not to mention the extra constraints that securing a system brings. To solve this then, communication is the key. Discuss the importance of securing each part and the tradeoffs, then collaborate to arrive at a reasonable solution.

It is not for the project team to mediate or decide the direction to take but for the business to determine which options delivers the most business value and aligns most clearly to the company's strategy. With effective governance, issues relating to conflicting stakeholder views can, and should be, escalated to the appropriate board and resolved without impacting the project team.

Here are my strategies to tackle this problem- Clarify Stakeholder Concerns: Conduct one-on-one discussions to understand and document specific concerns. Align on Common Goals: Establish shared security objectives (e.g., data protection, compliance) to foster collaboration. Use Data-Driven Insights: Present breach statistics and cost data to shift focus to objective risks. Hold Regular Updates: Schedule bi-weekly check-ins to keep everyone informed and aligned. Propose Phased Rollout: Start with basic security measures and scale up for smoother adaptation. Leverage Real-World Scenarios: Use hypothetical examples to illustrate risks and impacts.

Got a security showdown? Let’s turn that clash into collaboration: 1. Roundtable it: Get everyone in one room. Vent, share, and get it all on the table. 2. Expert referee: Bring in a pro to set the record straight and settle any confusion. 3. Slow and steady: Roll out security bit by bit, giving everyone a chance to weigh in along the way. 4. Build bridges: Address their worries directly and earn some trust points. 5. Keep it open: No secrets—just regular updates so everyone’s on the same page. With this playbook, you’ll go from chaos to consensus in no time.

Unless a stakeholder has security expertise, this decision should be made by the team member designated as the expert in this area. This doesn't mean stakeholders shouldn't share their opinions. Everyone should feel free to present their perspectives and arguments, while the primary responsible person (if you don’t have one, elect the most knowledgeable team member) should ultimately make the decision, **addressing all viewpoints in their rationale**. If your team lacks the necessary expertise and this decision is critical, consider hiring an external consultant.

There are only two possible views regarding system security: sufficient or insufficient. The problems with the last option can mushroom. To assure sufficiency, no unauthorized access can occur.