You're faced with a client's urgent feature request. How do you balance innovation with system stability?
Balancing innovation and stability can be tricky. How would you handle an urgent feature request from a client?
You're faced with a client's urgent feature request. How do you balance innovation with system stability?
Balancing innovation and stability can be tricky. How would you handle an urgent feature request from a client?
-
To handle an urgent feature request, I’d first assess its impact and alignment with our roadmap. Then, I’d evaluate the resources needed and any potential risks. If it’s high-priority, I’d work with the team to integrate it carefully, breaking down tasks if needed to avoid disruptions. Clear communication with the client about timelines and expectations would be essential, along with post-launch monitoring to ensure stability.
-
To balance innovation with system stability on an urgent feature request, I'd start by clarifying the feature's requirements and urgency with the client to identify an MVP version. I'd assess potential risks to system stability by reviewing dependencies and potential conflicts with our existing setup. A phased approach works best, where an initial, limited version is tested in a staging environment, allowing us to confirm stability before a full rollout. Keeping open communication with the client about timelines and risks is essential. Finally, I’d monitor the implementation closely and have a rollback plan ready, ensuring we maintain system integrity while delivering value.
-
Once the actual requirements and urgency are properly aligned with the implementation roadmap, there are some, almost hygienic DevOps and SRE best practices that need to be in place to balance system stability while allowing rapid innovation, eg.: .)Feature Flags: Gradually release features and enable quick rollbacks. .)Automated Testing & CI/CD: Ensure sufficient quality and automated deployments (rollbacks). .)Error Budgets: Define reliability limits. .)Real-Time Monitoring: Define and monitor actual system health. It's essential to wrap these into a solid framework for your developers, otherwise you won't harvest the full potential of your capabilities.
-
Para atender requisitos e features urgentes dos clientes é importante ter um ambiente de teste e prova de conceito que possa receber implementações em curto espaço de tempo. Depois ter um plano estratégico de escalar as modificações em produção sem comprometer a performance atual do seu ambiente.
-
You should find the balance between your roadmap and your product vision and customers requirements of course. One thing how to manage it to have 30% sprint capacity for customers, 20% technical debt and the rest is innovation and your roadmap!
-
With the volatile environment this is very common. The first thing I evaluate is the MVP of the objective. Second step is to verify the impact of the changes and if same can be accommodate in the upcoming sprint. If the request has a hight business value then setting a small team for hot fix development is justified. Else a manual step to achieve the objective till the changes are deployed is most common practice
-
First of all, I would ask a relevant specialist from my team to assess the request to determine if it’s even feasible. If it’s feasible, we then need to add this feature to our general plan. It’s crucial to ensure a number of things here. We need to allocate resources and specialists to the new task and not disrupt the main process at the same time. For this, we can choose specialists assigned to non-crucial tasks or take people outside of the team. What’s more, we need to estimate schedule and financial changes and inform stakeholders about them. The main thing here is to avoid putting the core part of the project at risk when adding the new feature.
-
Balancing innovation with system stability when faced with a client's urgent feature request involves a strategic approach. First, assess the impact and involve cross-functional teams to devise a solution. Implement the feature in stages, starting with a minimal viable product (MVP) to manage risks and allow for iterative improvements. Ensure rigorous testing in a controlled environment before deployment. Maintain clear communication with the client, keeping them informed about progress, potential risks, and mitigation steps. This approach ensures that the client's needs are met without compromising the system's integrity.
-
Em ambientes ágeis o PO prioriza as histórias que são mais importantes para o produto. Se houver itens que garantem a estabilidade do produto, estes devem ser priorizados frente a novas funcionalidades. Caso contrário, deve ser feita uma analise de complexidade e retorno para priorização das novas features.
-
When faced with an urgent feature request from a client, balancing innovation with system stability requires careful consideration and a structured approach. Here's how I would approach this situation: 1. Assess the request: 2. Consider system stability: 3. Prioritize and plan: 4. Propose a phased approach: 5. Implement safeguards: 6. Communicate with stakeholders: 7. Monitor and iterate: Remember that every situation is unique, and you may need to adapt this approach based on the circumstances, such as the complexity of the feature, the current state of the system, and the available resources. Always prioritize open communication with both the client and your team throughout the process to ensure alignment and expectations effectively.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
ManufacturingHere's how you can effectively convey the advantages of new technology to manufacturing stakeholders.
-
Information TechnologyYou're torn between innovation and system reliability. How do you find the right balance?
-
Business InnovationYou're facing conflicting views on technology for innovation. How do you navigate the clash of opinions?
-
Technological InnovationWhat challenges must you overcome to implement new technologies globally?