You disagree with a colleague on the presentation format. How will you navigate this conflict effectively?
When presentation styles clash, it's essential to approach the situation diplomatically. Here are strategies to resolve the conflict:
- Listen actively to understand their perspective and articulate your own views clearly.
- Propose a compromise that incorporates elements from both formats.
- Seek feedback from an impartial third party if reaching a mutual decision proves difficult.
How do you handle differing opinions in the workplace? Consider sharing your approach.
You disagree with a colleague on the presentation format. How will you navigate this conflict effectively?
When presentation styles clash, it's essential to approach the situation diplomatically. Here are strategies to resolve the conflict:
- Listen actively to understand their perspective and articulate your own views clearly.
- Propose a compromise that incorporates elements from both formats.
- Seek feedback from an impartial third party if reaching a mutual decision proves difficult.
How do you handle differing opinions in the workplace? Consider sharing your approach.
-
It is not a bad idea to disagree on the format unless there is a pre-defined one. Few steps that I would take: 1. I would place my understanding and logic behind my disagreement. 2. Listen to my colleague's perspective to the approach. (it could even be I would agree if it logically makes sense) 3. Constructively argue for the betterment of the objective of the presentation. 4. Negotiate and confirm the approach to finalize the format. But format is just one aspect of the presentation and there are more things to worry about such as the contents, crispiness, storytelling, right information rightly represented visually so that it appeals to the audience and properly articulates the objective, outcome, and expectations.
-
This happens most of the time when there is no structured format to present and a pitch is being made either for business development, raising money, selling a business etc. I learnt several years back that before a presentation gets developed one should write one line statement which is the core message of the presentation and then develop the present around it. To choose a format over another the reverse should be done ie whichever format of presentation conveys the central theme best should be the preferred format. If in difficulty, do it to a third party and get the core message received by them and choose the one that is closest to what you want to convey.
-
It’s not a big deal :) It’s just a formate , as long as the content is clear and meets the training/ presentation objectives so others things can be handled smoothly
-
This is a tricky situation and will occur a lot of times. It is best to 1. Approach with Openness and Respect - It is best to acknowledge the perspective of the colleague Start by acknowledging their perspective to make them comfortable. 2. Focus on the Shared Goal Shift the focus from the disagreement to the objective: "to deliver the right message to the audience". Focus more on the presentation topics, what will be addressed. this will be more crucial, if you focus on the delivery points which are important to the business. The format then should not be so important.
-
Differing opinions in the workplace are normal. Get curious and have respectful conversations around understanding others' points of view. Sometimes, I have learned that my approach may not have been the best either and it's an opportunity to learn new ways to present. Being open to listening and learning is important. Building relationships is important. Decide what price you want to pay when navigating conflict.
-
As a presentation skills expert, I'd approach this conflict by emphasizing collaboration and finding common ground. Instead of focusing on who's right, I'd suggest exploring how we can create a presentation that's not only engaging and informative but also visually appealing and easy to understand. Framing the discussion as a joint effort to create the best possible presentation, we can harness our collective strengths and deliver a truly outstanding performance. A successful presentation isn't just about the content; it's about the audience experience.
-
I would suggest to think of this conflict like two chefs in a kitchen disagreeing on the best recipe for a dish. Instead of arguing over whose recipe is better, they could each taste-test the other’s approach, identifying the flavors that work best together. The goal isn’t to decide on one chef’s method but to blend both ideas into a unique, refined dish that appeals to the diners. By focusing on creating the best outcome and valuing each contribution, they can collaborate effectively, merging their expertise for a tastier result.
-
Disagreements about presentation formats can be resolved through respectful communication, understanding each other's perspectives, and focusing on shared goals. By actively listening, presenting ideas constructively, and being open to compromise, the conflict can lead to a collaborative and effective outcome.
-
I would see to understand my colleague's perspective to see where they’re coming from. I’d ask questions to clarify their reasons. Then, I’d share my own reasons, explaining how my suggested format might better serve the objectives of the presentation.
-
I'm not here to be right, I'm here to get it right. Part of getting it right is to know that someone else's idea may be better than mine. Clear communication and setting my ego aside will allow us to discuss options and make the best choice for the presentation, regardless of whose formatting it is.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Presentation SkillsHere's how you can navigate unexpected questions or challenges from your boss during a presentation.
-
PresentationsHow do you end your presentation on a positive note?
-
PresentationsHow can you handle questions that reveal gaps or errors in your presentation?
-
Presentation SkillsHow can you use compromise to resolve a conflict during a presentation?