Fleishman Is in Trouble: A Novel
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Now an Emmy Award–nominated FX limited series on Hulu, starring Claire Danes, Jesse Eisenberg, Lizzy Caplan, and Adam Brody
ONE OF THE TEN BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR: Entertainment Weekly, The New York Public Library
ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR: The New York Times Book Review, Time, The Washington Post, USA Today Vanity Fair, Vogue, NPR, Chicago Tribune, GQ, Vox, Refinery29, Elle, The Guardian, Real Simple, Financial Times, Parade, Good Housekeeping, New Statesman, Marie Claire, Town & Country, Evening Standard, Thrillist, Booklist, Kirkus Reviews, BookPage, BookRiot, Shelf Awareness
Toby Fleishman thought he knew what to expect when he and his wife of almost fifteen years separated: weekends and every other holiday with the kids, some residual bitterness, the occasional moment of tension in their co-parenting negotiations. He could not have predicted that one day, in the middle of his summer of sexual emancipation, Rachel would just drop their two children off at his place and simply not return. He had been working so hard to find equilibrium in his single life. The winds of his optimism, long dormant, had finally begun to pick up. Now this.
As Toby tries to figure out where Rachel went, all while juggling his patients at the hospital, his never-ending parental duties, and his new app-assisted sexual popularity, his tidy narrative of the spurned husband with the too-ambitious wife is his sole consolation. But if Toby ever wants to truly understand what happened to Rachel and what happened to his marriage, he is going to have to consider that he might not have seen things all that clearly in the first place.
A searing, utterly unvarnished debut, Fleishman Is in Trouble is an insightful, unsettling, often hilarious exploration of a culture trying to navigate the fault lines of an institution that has proven to be worthy of our great wariness and our great hope.
Alma’s Best Jewish Novel of the Year • Finalist for the National Book Critics Circle’s John Leonard Prize for Best First Book
Related to Fleishman Is in Trouble
Related ebooks
The Borrowed Hills: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Close to Home: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crying Wolf: A Memoir Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigging to Australia: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Once a Monster: Mythical. Monstrous. Misunderstood. A Magical Retelling of the Legend of the Minotaur Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Brightfellow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Refugee Ocean Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Confession of Hemingway Jones Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Far Side of the Desert Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ophelia Girls Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Way to Be Happy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAila's Journal: A Tale of Southern Reconstruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGood To a Fault: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quicksand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In The Full Light Of The Sun: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Tailings: A Memoir Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Notes from the Henhouse: On Marrying a Poet, Raising Children and Chickens, and Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHeaven & Earth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWidow: Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Back in the Land of the Living: A Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Best Intentions: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Island Rule: Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Marriage Made at Woodstock: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tiny Pieces of Enid Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSugar Money: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Coney Island Baby: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Wingwalkers: A Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Keepers of Truth: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Steady Running of the Hour: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Country You Can Leave: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Family Life For You
The Covenant of Water (Oprah's Book Club) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Night Road: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ulysses: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leave the World Behind: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Poisonwood Bible: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brother Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Storyteller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Then She Was Gone: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jungle: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mother-in-Law: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Little Life: A Novel by Hanya Yanagihara | Summary & Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Thing He Told Me: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How It Always Is: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stranger in the Lifeboat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The People We Keep Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5City of Laughter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Sister's Keeper: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bournville Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Foster Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Small Things Like These Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Simple Wild: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Five Tuesdays in Winter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bean Trees: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Town: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School for Good Mothers: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nothing to See Here: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tinkers: 10th Anniversary Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Boy Swallows Universe: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dandelion Wine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Fleishman Is in Trouble
440 ratings36 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5It's hard to believe that Taffy Brodesser-Akner's FLEISHMAN IS IN TROUBLE is her first novel, because it's just so damn GOOD! I mean, from page one it so totally sucked me in, which is probably a good description, because her style is very (Philip)Roth-ian, or Roth-esque, or whatever. Meaning there's lots of sex, of all kinds. Like she spent her younger years peering over Roth's shoulder as he wrote some of his juiciest old-white-guy material. Because she certainly knows Roth, who even gets a token mention, as one of the authors (along with Bellow) that her protagonist, Dr Toby Fleishman, imagined his ideal woman might be reading when he would first meet her. Which didn't happen, of course. Instead he met Rachel, fell in love and married her. And now, fifteen years and two kids later, their marriage is almost over. They are separated. She got everything. He gets the kids every other weekend. The Fleishmans are in trouble. Yes, both of them. Because this is a book about the dissolution of a marriage, about how hard it is to stay in love, about differing goals and dreams and ambitions, about parenting by the seat of your pants, social climbing, and about starting over, at forty-one, in the age of smart phones and dating apps - and pornographic pics sent from interested women. Toby is wallowing in all of this fresh fleish, er, flesh, and still trying to be a responsible father to his eleven year-old daughter, Hannah, who is already feeling prepubescent pangs of puppy love, and sensitive nine year-old Solly.
So yeah, initially you think this story is all about Toby, with an omniscient narrator. Then suddenly this narrator becomes Libby, Toby's longtime friend from college, who might have been his girlfriend, except for the fact that Toby is only five foot four, a disadvantage he is all too aware of. Toby and Libby and Seth, still a libertine bachelor, were a tight threesome in college, and have stayed in touch intermittently. Libby, we learn, married with children, has given up her job as a writer for a men's magazine to be a stay-at-home mom. Discontented, she wants to be a writer, but, after some false starts, she discovers -
"My voice only came alive when I was talking about someone else; my ability to see the truth and to extrapolate human emotion based on what I saw and was told didn't extend to myself.
Hence, voila! She becomes the voice of Toby's story and Rachel's, and Seth's. And her story is dropped in there too, eventually. It's complicated. And much of Libby's discontent comes from her realization that -
"There were so many ways of being a woman in the world, but all of them still rendered her just a woman, which is to say: a target."
Toby's story - and Rachel's too - as Libby presents them, are sad and painful, and hard to look away from. And the effects on the children are equally tragic. Because all the Fleishmans are in trouble. Marriage is hard, but separation and divorce are even harder.
I've read a lot of Philip Roth over the years, and so, apparently, has Brodesser-Akner. One of my favorite Roth novels is his first, the often overlooked coming-of-age LETTING GO. It is very similar to this book in that it alternates between an omniscient narrator and a first-person in the voice of protagonist Gabe Wallach. And a major female character in LETTING GO, is named Libby, a married woman Gabe is more than a little in love with. So yeah, I suspect Taffy Brodesser-Akner is very much a student of Philip Roth's work, and, as a result, she has crafted a multi-faceted masterpiece on the pleasures and perils of men and women falling in love and out of love, marriage and divorce, lust and longing and so many other things. I loved this book. My very highest recommendation.
- Tim Bazzett, author of the memoir, BOOKLOVER - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Really liked the book to start with, tremendously funny. Started getting increasingly unsettled by it, and I didn’t love the final quarter of it. I suspect my Y chromosome is the problem here. But well worth reading.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I have a lot of feelings about this book.
First of all it is just the type of book that I like best. It is chunky - its a deep dive into people's lives. I didnt have a problem reading it or continuing on with it. So in that way it was successful.
But -- I had trouble liking any of the characters. i feel like I was supposed to have some kind of revelatory compassion for one of them - but that didn't happen. There was also this simmering hatred (guilt?) regarding stay at home moms that it felt like she was trying to be jokey about but came off kind of filled with rage.
Also, the way marriage is looked at is really sad. It seems like no one has even a basic friendship with their partner. It's hard and terrible to imagine how you could be surrounded by people who screwed up that basic element of partnership so much.
I found the extra narrator really ripped me out of the story everytime she stepped into focus. I honestly can not understand that choice. It is so uneven and jarring the way it is used. I feel like an editor really failed the author on letting that stand the way it did.
I don't know if the author is a fan of Tom Perrotta but a lot of the subject matter in this book felt Perrotta-esque to me. Sandly though, the treatment and the handling lacked Perrotta's nuance and humor.
I haven't watched the tv adaptation yet but I am curious enough that I will probably check it out. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I really don't know how to feel about this book. On the one hand, I recognize that this is a "good" book. I understand all the praise it's received from the powers that be. On the other hand, I guess I just didn't like it very much? The writing is excellent and it's full of great lines and insights, but it all just felt like a little too much. It seemed like the author took every idea she ever had about marriage, motherhood, sexism, love, lust, middle age, etc. and put it all in this one book. I felt exhausted reading it, and I was so relieved to finally finish it. I probably would have quit on it by page 50 or so if it wasn't on the Tournament of Books, but at the same time I don't necessarily regret reading it. I don't think I've ever been so confounded by a book before, so that's saying something at least.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I did not like this book at all, although I did care about the characters. There was so much boring detail and repetition. The blurbs and references to the book were so positive I plowed through it expecting great illuminations which did not materialize.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sexism Illustrated
“Isms” can be blatant, in-your-face insulting and dispiriting, and even the “ism” practitioner, hopefully, can recognize these. For example, you can easily spot racism and sexism when someone shouts disparaging epithets at you. Of course, rarely does it work this way with “isms” like these. These people express subtly while disclaiming them as any attack on your race or sex; it must be you, your problem. In her debut novel Fleishman Is in Trouble, Taffy Brodesser-Akner builds an entire novel involving three principal characters around sexism, how it’s practiced and how it effects women. Which might come as a surprise, because the title implies the novel is about a man. It is for its first two-thirds, to illustrate sexism in action. Yes, the novel is about more, about a troubled marriage of a successful liver doctor, Toby Fleishman, and an enterprising celebrity agent, Rachel Fleishman, and their friend, a former magazine writer, now New Jersey housewife, Libby, who narrates the story, and then inserts herself into it.
Toby Fleishman, a successful hepatologist at a large New York City hospital, has just separated from his wife of fifteen years. He enjoys and derives his professional satisfaction from working with patients. That’s the extent of his ambition. Now separated, he finds himself navigating the new world of dating women in his age group, the mid-forties. Libby relates his story as he has told it to her during his short period of separation. This includes how Rachel never had time for him, never had time for their two children, Hanna and Solly, how she never appreciated that he adjusted his schedule to always be home at 5:30 to relieve the nanny and care for the children or how he prepared the meals. He especially gripes that she’s pushy, that she constantly drove him to move up, to take a bigger job in the hospital, to make more money, to do essentially as she is doing. Then she disappears for a few weeks, precipitating a crisis in his life and the household. All he wanted was a normal wife, and what he got was a crazy one, he laments regularly.
We readers hear this for two-thirds of the novel. At first, we feel sympathetic to Toby. What more could a woman want? Here’s a man who colleagues regard as top in his field. Here’s a man who rejiggers his busy life to accommodate her aspirations. What does he get for it? A wife who won’t listen to, who is so absorbed in her work running a very successfully agency that she has no time for anything else. And a woman who earns the big bucks that pay for all the amenities he himself enjoys. After a while, you begin to see through the Toby façade and you suspect there’s more to this story than just a crazy woman.
At this point, Libby finally runs into Rachel and finds her a wreck, in the midst of a whopper of a nervous breakdown. Here we get Rachel’s side of the various incidents Toby carped about to Libby. And here we learn about the many ways life has treated her badly, from a loveless upbringing, to sexism at her former agency, to Toby not realizing and not trying to realize all that she accomplished and what she contributed to the household, all the things she did behind the scenes unnoticed by him, so absorbed in himself and his career as he was. Obviously, as the old movie line goes, a failure to communicate. But more, which Brodesser-Akner illustrates powerfully by making the start of the novel about Toby and then turning it around so we see all the forces working against women who might have even a modicum of ambition, all done unconsciously by Toby and society. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I don't normally read fiction and I rarely read fiction written by women. However I saw this book listed on so many “Best of 2019” book lists that I wanted to read it. I am very glad that I did. It was a very entertaining story from the first page till the end. The story centered around a man recently separated with two kids trying to figure out the rest of his life. The story starts with his ex-wife literally disappearing and leaving him with the care of his two kids. He also has to balance his career as a doctor around the care of his children and his now burgeoning social life.
It’s not a story unfamilar with most divorces. Guilt, revenge, hate and regrets are all incorporated into the story, as well as plenty of sex and adultery.
The story recounts his youth and his early beginnings with his ex-wife. The reader will follow the deterioration of his marriage plus the financial and career challenges associated with the failing marriage. It's a literary soap opera – – stories within stories.
The kicker at the end is the reappearance of the missing ex-wife. She too has a story to tell and the author balances her story against that of her ex-husband.
This is the author’s first book. It appears she has left a cliffhanger for a follow up book. I will be interested in reading that. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I don't mind novels about entitled rich people and their problems. Occasionally, they turn me into a screeching Marxist, but the prevailing emotion is less jealousy and more a smug relief that I'm middle class and have to deal with none of this. I am under no obligation to indulge finance whizzes and pretend that they have any social utility. So Taffy Brodesser-Akner's debut novel didn't bother me on that score. She's not really expecting us to feel sorry for the poor benighted rich. Woe is Toby Fleishman, who only makes $285K a year and had to rely on his soon-to-be ex-wife to keep him in the style to which he had become accustomed.
I love Brodesser-Akner's magazine journalism, and she's certainly a fine writer. The book is funny and she's is familiar with the world she's skewering--99% of the details are spot on. (Although I wish a woman who had spent most of her childhood as an Orthodox Jew would know that tallitot are not worn at evening services!)
But I wasn't sure how to feel about her novel or its characters. It's clear from the outset that Toby, no matter what he wants to think about himself, isn't entirely sympathetic. I didn't feel suckered into having faith in a character who turned out to be a villain, which he isn't exactly. The setup of the novel is also tricky: it appears to be a third person (primarily from Toby's point of view), but then there's asides from the first person narrator, an old friend of Toby's from college. I think the counterpoint and memories Libby offers added a lot of context and depth, but as a reading experience it wasn't precisely smooth, and I had to wonder how I, the reader, was supposed to know everything in the third person narration.
--- VERY MILD SPOILERS AHEAD ---
Eventually, the payoff is that we get Rachel's point of view. It's been described as something of a reversal, but I don't think it's that, either. As a woman, I certainly sympathized with a lot of what was said here, but it's less a clear cut flip and more a giant muddying of the waters. It's certainly realistic, but it didn't necessarily cause me to reevaluate everything that had previously taken place. That was in part because there was some foreshadowing, but also because hearing all of Rachel's internal explanations for her motivations and actions didn't really soften her that much--in the context of the whole rich people's problems setup, part of the issue was her motivations and goals. It wasn't something I could easily sympathize with. There was a sense that Brodesser-Akner wanted readers to sympathize with Rachel as a stand in for women and mothers in general, but she isn't. The problem with rich people problems is that they aren't exactly our problems. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A solid meh.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5A reviewer of this book said it reminded her of the great novels of the 60s and 70s that John Updike or Philip Roth might have written. Being a fan of both of those authors, I thought "Great, let's give it a shot!" Unfortunately, I hated this book, only made it to page 50 before giving up, and cursed the narrator of the story, some female who was apparently a college classmate of the title character. I couldn't figure out why she was narrating Fleishman's story and found her involvement annoying and confusing. I suppose I should have given this book more of a chance, but I just couldn't get into it and didn't feel like struggling with it any further.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This. Hit. Hard. Clever, yes, but also due to where I am. Which, not sure what to think about _that_.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I loved this funny, eliptical mysterious novel about marriage and what we give up and gain in committing to another person.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This started strong, and made me laugh at several points early on, but the perspective shift at the end lost some of my interest. The final diatribe by the author's stand-in killed most of the remaining momentum, IMHO. A little disappointing, because I quite enjoyed the first 2/3 of the book.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I've seen a lot of mixed reviews on this one, mostly from people who DNFd it for the overt sexuality and just not caring about the story of this man. Also, this book is long. I totally get it! And yet I'm so glad I finished, because it really comes full circle and suddenly you find yourself in the middle of these big thoughts about identity and marriage and self-definition and feeling stifled by having the very things you had wanted and sought. Suddenly the perspective you've lived in changes and this story becomes a feminist exploration of the world's treatment and expectations of women. There's no plot twist. The writer just methodically leads you to this place where you realize you're not quite sure how you got there but it all makes sense.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A book about a man in crisis, from the perspective of a female friend, that's maybe really about what it's like to be a woman in the world after all? I couldn't put down this funny and smart novel, and I enjoyed the clever ways the writer showed us Fleishman from different perspectives – from within his own head, and from the perspective of the real narrator, trying to talk to him on the train and getting only solipsism. I felt like some of the side characters could have been fleshed out a bit more, or at least played a more critical role in the plot beyond symbolism, but overall this was a lovely and thoughtful book – looking forward to more from her.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A powerful, funny read that tells you straight what is going to do and then surprises you when the author does it.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5There is so much about this novel that is well-done. Brodesser-Akner's writing is deceptively straightforward, the pacing and rhythm reflect the pacing and rhythm of the city and its dwellers, the setting and images are crisp and vivid. She plays with narration with terrific skill; more than once I found myself surprised or cheerfully reminded. Her analysis of gender roles as they play out in marriage, work, and the landscape of opportunity in the U.S. is spot on. It's also too often tedious and unsubtle.
I also realize that heterosexual marriage as a theme pretty much leaves me cold. I get that it's a central institution in our society and that important elements of life, regardless of the era, play out within this institution. Marriage as it manifests in any given place and time reflects the deep values of that place and time as well as - and perhaps better than - any other component of daily life. But to do it well is to expose its ugly underbelly; novels meant to elucidate marriage as a mirror on society almost always dig into a marriage on the rocks. The criticism, defensiveness, contempt, and stonewalling (those are the referenced four horsemen of the apocalypse of marriage, in case you wondered), the disillusionment, violence, infidelity and regret that seem necessary to any meaningful literary analysis of marriage -- I just don't enjoy reading about them. I don't enjoy mucking around in the ugly intimacy of other people's disastrous relationships.
If I set all that aside, I can more fully appreciate Fleishman is in Trouble. And I never wanted to stop reading; I cared about what was going to happen even if I didn't care about the characters themselves. Well, there is Solly. He is a lovable character through and through. But in the end, this was a good read rather than a great one, and not one deserving of a prize intended to settle a novel into the ranks of the year's best. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The problem with this couple was lack of communication, it may not have saved the marriage but could have made the divorce civil.
These characters were self-absorbed, clueless, elitist whose hypocrisy was laughable. If this is how people in New York truly live and think, our society is in deep trouble. I understand it is a work of fiction, but many passages were observations of the writer.....I shudder. Although, there was one in particular that I thought was spot on......page 42 regarding working mother's and stay-at home mothers. It is soooo true....
Sounds like I didn't like the book, but I read it in two and half days....so I guess I liked it...so hard to recommend, I admit I skimmed a small bit, but there were times where she repeated herself ad nauseam. (maybe that is a bit extreme, but she did repeat herself, where was her editor?) I usually avoid books about New Yorkers because they think the world revolves around them and this one is no exception. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This book is not an advertisement for the institution of marriage nor is it a novel peopled by mentally stable people. All the characters seem to be chasing ideals they can not achieve. That said, the novel is very well written and moves along effortlessly through a plethora of events anchored by Toby and Rachel a New York Jewish couple with two children. Rachel is much more ambitious than Toby who is a doctor. The focal point is their pending divorce because Rachel is frustrated with Toby's lack of drive. I loved the book in a voyeuristic kind of way.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The characters in this book are so deeply flawed, but the reader still wants to know all about them. It is clear from the beginning that Toby is kind of a controlling self-involved little man with severe Napoleonic complex and its clear that he knows nothing about his ex-wife. Other than that nothing is clear. This book is about men and women and marriage and the lie of feminism and the fact that if you are a mother and have a career outside the home you are working twice as hard but the world makes you apologize because at least you have objective worth. It is about how we all compromise for men to have professional success, but we revile women who work hard - forget compromising we go the other way and vilify. Basic truth, women are penalized for doing things men do and are lauded for and men are celebrated for doing things people just expect as a baseline for women. I laughed at what a big deal is made becuae Toby picks his kids up from school. So ladies, can you imagine one of your kids' teachers getting all swoony because you picked up your damn offspring? It is appalling. Also, I loved that Toby just brought his kids to work and stashed them in the conference room for a full work day. Again, who does that? Not women, that is for sure. This is the thing that most holds back women. Women are exhausted and unhappy for a reason -- they are expected to be grateful and to fight for the right to hold 2-3 full time jobs simultaneously, and to be paid less for the honor.
The book is also about different kinds of love and different kinds of people and the assault of passivity. We stop working at love, stop thinking about what is expected. Unconditional love outside of parents and children is a ridiculous notion. Relationships take work, And people assume that if they don't say anything mean they are doing all they need to do to move relationships forward. (This applies outside of love relationships too. Certainly it is there in both marriages we see but also this is Toby at work. He allows things to happen to him, and then is pissed when he doesn't move up as a reward for taking no real initiative other than simply being good at his job. If he asked for things, if he defined his role, if he took things seriously things would happen, but he just shows up, does his job, and assumes people will celebrate him the same way they do for picking up is damn kids or being on a dating app and not being entirely gross.
This is about how money and the love of money change us, how it grows unchecked, even if we pretend we don't love the money. (Toby loves the trappings of money, he just likes to bitch.) This is about how Jersey is as good as New York (we will have to agree to disagree on that one point) and about how continuing to be married is a choice, a choice to remember why you are married especially in the moments the monotony and responsibility seems it will crush you. It is about life.
Brodesser-Akner is the 21st century version of Philip Roth, and this time the women get to tell the story. For me it was tied for best book of the 2019 (I read it in late December.) Tied with the Great Believers which was ridiculously great. In the immortal words of When Harry Met Sally "YES YES YES." - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This first novel by Taffy Brodesser-Akner is a smart, well written exploration of a marriage gone wrong. Four characters drive the narrative and present for the reader the different examples of mid life struggles. For Toby Fleishman, he appears the poor but dedicated husband whose wife worked long hours as an agent because she wasn't happy with a salary gleaned by a liver specialist in a respected NYC hospital. Toby is also amazed at the world of dating right now for a short, Jewish doctor whose phone app continually pings him with invitations from woman who not only want him but advertise by showing parts of their genitalia. The beginning is funny and clever, like Roth or Franzen, depicting the current state of the world and making quotable observations.
We then start to realize the novel is being narrated by Toby's college friend, Elizabeth. "I was from Brooklyn, from a family full of girls who were expected to transfer from their childhood bedrooms to the bedrooms of their husband’s homes with no pit stops along the way." It is Elizabeth, called Libby, that provides the insights and then her own version of midlife that turns this novel into something more than originally expected. Libby, like the author, works for a men's magazine as the token female perspective and makes a living profiling famous men in her more understanding view. She is well aware that she has become almost invisible in her world. "But no one was watching. People didn’t look at me anymore. I’m allowed to go into bathrooms that are only for customers now anywhere in the city. I could shoplift if I wanted to, is how ignored I am."
Then the author turns the story around when Libby starts to tell the story of Toby's wife, Rachel.
One other amusing subplot is the third college friend, Seth. Here's Libby's description: "He’d stayed thin and had a well-executed fake tan and fake ultra-white teeth that played well against his leonine hazel eyes that picked up every shade of light brown in what remained of his hair. On his face he had the kind of two-day stubble growth we used to suggest that cover stars at the magazine nurture before their photo shoot that looks like benign neglect but is actually so evenly shaded that it could only be the work of meticulous planning. Man, all of it, he was still so handsome I could barely look at him." Seth is wealthy and charismatic in fact seems to have it all, but alas wants what his friends are questioning.
I have to admit I missed hearing of Toby's troubles and aligned with his pain of his wife abandoning her children, but then there were other factors to hear. Reminded me of Groff's Fates and Furies and that's pretty good company. Impressive first novel- highly recommend. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This glorious mess of a novel, about 100 pages too long, needs to be read, but you'll be forgiven if you run out of patience and if the overwhelming prurience does you in. If you are a person who says, “There wasn’t one redeeming character in the whole book”, then run, don’t walk. The main one in trouble (there are oh so many) is Manhattanite Toby Fleishman, MD specializing in livers. He and wife Rachel, wealthy owner of a talent agency, are divorcing, and much of the narrative is the overly familiarly navel-gazing of Horrible Rich White People With Tiny Rich White People Problems.
Toby's astonishment at the lush pickings of available horny, self-obsessed women in his dating apps gets very wearying. His sole positive trait is his love for his kids, the spoiled and despicable 11 year old Hannah, running the private school mean girl marathon to an extent that must be unheard of outside of NYC or LA; and little Solly, who’s chunky, smart, and lonely. Rachel herself is completely crippled by lack of love from her hypercritical grandmother, who reluctantly raised her from age three with no kindness, interest, or love. And just her luck: a horrible c-section by a brutal on-call ob-gyn causes lack of attachment to the children.
There's also an extraneous narrator, Toby's college friend Libby, and another college friend Seth, who seems to be around just to show everyone what a mess unmarried people are too. Both should have been eliminated by a good editor. Libby's view of her own marriage and career may have been meant to provide the woman's rebuttal to Toby's thoughts, but it just doesn't work here, like it did so brilliantly in Lauren Groff's Fates and Furies.
In almost every page, there's the opportunity for the reader to scream LEAVE MANHATTAN NOW AND SAVE YOURSELVES. What makes it all bearable is the hilariously snarky jabs at all aspects of the lives of almost all the characters. It's also got plot swerves and dead ends that leave the reader in agonized suspense. I’m glad I read it, just for the experience, but you probably won’t want to, so I’m sharing the best lines.
Quotes: “I was so far apart from my life in New York that it was like I’d been sent to another planet to breed and colonize.”
“You can only desire something you don’t have.”
“He’s linear and infers rules from onetime behaviors, which drives me crazy.”
“She was golden and tan, like an Oscar with hair.”
“The men hadn’t had any external troubles. They were born knowing they belonged, and they were reassured at every turn just in case they’d forgotten.” - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Not really my style of book. Cynical - yet truthful in much of the cynicism - I just try not to revel in that too much. Was able to relate to some parts, some parts seemed to drag on.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This to me was a great book. It was on the long list for the National Book Award 2019. It basically got universal excellent reviews from the usual suspects(Ny Times etc.). In terms of the negative reader reviews, many them did not finish the book which really sort of invalidates their reviews(in my opinion). The earlier you quit the less your review means. What I enjoyed about this book was that it created multiple points of view and the writing was terrific. The basic plot deals with Toby a 44 year old New York liver specialist who is divorcing Rachel a high end driven talent agent who makes 10 times what Toby makes. Are the characters in the books basically rich entitled people who may not elicit much sympathy for their problems from many people? However, liking characters is not necessary(for me at least) to enjoy a book. As we get into the book we begin to see Rachel as a monster but we see this through Toby's lens. Eventually Libby enters the book as a first person narrator. She is an old friend of Toby's who reconnects with because of his divorce. We also get see the world of the newly divorced as they navigate the world of dating apps and sexual hookups. This is a complex novel that deals with marriage, male and female roles, spoiled rich children and the world of the New York rich. I thought it was one of the best books I have read in the last few years. The subject matter connected with me. Read more about the book and see if it works for you plot wise. This is Taffy's first novel but she is a featured writer at the NY Times magazine.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/52020 TOB--This was so well written for a first book. Toby Fleishman, a stereotypical Jewish doctor, gets divorced from his wife Rachel. Rachel is a woman who wants more and more in life and goes after it. Toby reconnects with college friends during the divorce and the narrator of the book is one of those friends, Elizabeth.
Elizabeth has problems of her own in her marriage. Their other friend Seth has commitment issues but he's getting ready to propose to a much younger girlfriend.
Rachel goes off the deep end and Toby has to maneuver full time parenting at the cost of losing a promotion at the hospital. But overall Toby really tries hard at parenting and is a good parent.
This is a book about stereotypes, relationships on many levels and success and failure. There are many profound sentences in this book that made me take notice. How can the author Taffy Brodesser-Akner be so wise and yet so young?
This is a book that almost everyone can identify with. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I did not like this book. The characters were whinny and annoying. Also Elizabeth narrating did not flow.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Well written story of marriage.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The funny parts were great, the serious parts a bit too on the nose. Maybe it is because the characters are never real people, but more like New Yorker sketches whose problems are more aspirational than real. It isn't easy to write funny characters who are also real—Richard Russo does it, but who else?
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I'm not sure what the fuss is about this book. I don't get it. I've read some reviews and I know the direction it's heading but I really can't be bothered to keep reading it until I get to the 'reveal'. It's just a chore and there appears to be no story.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This starts as a modern Roth/Updike middle-age shagathon then twists into something else entirely. It isn’t really a book about the Fleishmans - like Jaws not being about sharks - but by the end, as the focus swung elsewhere, I wished it was. Still a lot of fun though.
Book preview
Fleishman Is in Trouble - Taffy Brodesser-Akner
Fleishman Is in Trouble is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents are the products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events, locales, or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental.
Copyright © 2019 by Taffy Brodesser-Akner
Book club guide copyright © 2020 by Penguin Random House LLC
All rights reserved.
Published in the United States by Random House, an imprint and division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York.
RANDOM HOUSE and the HOUSE colophon are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.
RANDOM HOUSE BOOK CLUB and colophon are trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.
Originally published in hardcover in the United States by Random House, an imprint and division of Penguin Random House LLC, in 2019.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
Names: Brodesser-Akner, Taffy, author.
Title: Fleishman is in trouble : a novel / Taffy Brodesser-Akner.
Description: New York: Random House, 2019.
Identifiers: LCCN 2018054871 | ISBN 9780525510895 (paperback) | ISBN 9780525510888 (ebook)
Subjects: | BISAC: FICTION / Family Life. | FICTION / Literary. | FICTION / Satire.
Classification: LCC PS3602.R63457 F57 2019 | DDC 813/.6—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018054871
Ebook ISBN 9780525510888
randomhousebooks.com
randomhousebookclub.com
Title-page and part-title-page photograph: © iStockphoto/Dmitry Mitrofanov
Book design by Mary A. Wirth, adapted for ebook
Cover design: Kelly Blair
Cover image: Keith Hayes
ep_prh_5.5.0_148359409_c0_r1
Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Epigraph
Part One: Fleishman Is in Trouble
Part Two: God, What an Idiot He Was
Part Three: Rachel Fleishman Is in Trouble
Dedication
A Book Club Guide
About the Author
Summon your witnesses.
—AESCHYLUS
PART ONE FLEISHMAN IS IN TROUBLEToby Fleishman awoke one morning inside the city he’d lived in all his adult life and which was suddenly somehow now crawling with women who wanted him. Not just any women, but women who were self-actualized and independent and knew what they wanted. Women who weren’t needy or insecure or self-doubting, like the long-ago prospects of his long-gone youth—meaning the women he had thought of as prospects but who had never given him even a first glance. No, these were women who were motivated and available and interesting and interested and exciting and excited. These were women who would not so much wait for you to call them one or two or three socially acceptable days after you met them as much as send you pictures of their genitals the day before. Women who were open-minded and up for anything and vocal about their desires and needs and who used phrases like put my cards on the table
and no strings attached
and I need to be done in ten because I have to pick up Bella from ballet.
Women who would fuck you like they owed you money, was how our friend Seth put it.
Yes, who could have predicted that Toby Fleishman, at the age of forty-one, would find that his phone was aglow from sunup to sundown (in the night the glow was extra bright) with texts that contained G-string and ass cleavage and underboob and sideboob and just straight-up boob and all the parts of a woman he never dared dream he would encounter in a person who was three-dimensional—meaning literally three-dimensional, as in a person who wasn’t on a page or a computer screen. All this, after a youth full of romantic rejection! All this, after putting a lifetime bet on one woman! Who could have predicted this? Who could have predicted that there was such life in him yet?
Still, he told me, it was jarring. Rachel was gone now, and her goneness was so incongruous to what had been his plan. It wasn’t that he still wanted her—he absolutely did not want her. He absolutely did not wish she were still with him. It was that he had spent so long waiting out the fumes of the marriage and busying himself with the paperwork necessary to extricate himself from it—telling the kids, moving out, telling his colleagues—that he had not considered what life might be like on the other side of it. He understood divorce in a macro way, of course. But he had not yet adjusted to it in a micro way, in the other-side-of-the-bed-being-empty way, in the nobody-to-tell-you-were-running-late way, in the you-belong-to-no-one way. How long was it before he could look at the pictures of women on his phone—pictures the women had sent him eagerly and of their own volition—straight on, instead of out of the corner of his eye? Okay, sooner than he thought but not immediately. Certainly not immediately.
He hadn’t looked at another woman once during his marriage, so in love with Rachel was he—so in love was he with any kind of institution or system. He made solemn, dutiful work of trying to save the relationship even after it would have been clear to any reasonable person that their misery was not a phase. There was nobility in the work, he believed. There was nobility in the suffering. And even after he realized that it was over, he still had to spend years, plural, trying to convince her that this wasn’t right, that they were too unhappy, that they were still young and could have good lives without each other—even then he didn’t let one millimeter of his eye wander. Mostly, he said, because he was too busy being sad. Mostly because he felt like garbage all the time, and a person shouldn’t feel like garbage all the time. More than that, a person shouldn’t be made horny when he felt like garbage. The intersection of horniness and low self-esteem seemed reserved squarely for porn consumption.
But now there was no one to be faithful to. Rachel wasn’t there. She was not in his bed. She was not in the bathroom, applying liquid eyeliner to the area where her eyelid met her eyelashes with the precision of an arthroscopy robot. She was not at the gym, or coming back from the gym in a less black mood than usual, not by much but a little. She was not up in the middle of the night, complaining about the infinite abyss of her endless insomnia. She was not at Curriculum Night at the kids’ extremely private and yet somehow progressive school on the West Side, sitting in a small chair and listening to the new and greater demands that were being placed on their poor children compared to the prior year. (Though, then again she rarely was. Those nights, like the other nights, she was at work, or at dinner with a client, what she called pulling her weight
when she was being kind, and what she called being your cash cow
when she wasn’t.) So no, she was not there. She was in a completely other home, the one that used to be his, too. Every single morning this thought overwhelmed him momentarily; it panicked him, so that the first thing he thought when he awoke was this: Something is wrong. There is trouble. I am in trouble. It had been he who asked for the divorce, and still: Something is wrong. There is trouble. I am in trouble. Each morning, he shook this off. He reminded himself that this was what was healthy and appropriate and the natural order. She wasn’t supposed to be next to him anymore. She was supposed to be in her separate, nicer home.
But she wasn’t there, either, not on this particular morning. He learned this when he leaned over to his new IKEA nightstand and picked up his phone, whose beating presence he felt even in those few minutes before his eyes officially opened. He had maybe seven or eight texts there, most of them from women who had reached out during the night via his dating app, but his eyes went straight to Rachel’s text, somewhere in the middle. It seemed to give off a different light than the ones that contained body parts and lacy bands of panty; it somehow drew his eyes in a way the others didn’t. At five A.M. she’d written, I’m headed to Kripalu for the weekend; the kids are at your place FYI.
It took two readings to realize what that meant, and Toby, ignoring the erection he’d allowed to flourish knowing that his phone was rife with new masturbation material, jumped out of bed. He ran into the hallway, and he saw that their two children were in their bedrooms, asleep. FYI the kids were there? FYI? FYI was an afterthought; FYI was supplementary. It wasn’t essential. This information, that his children had been deposited into his home under the cover of darkness during an unscheduled time with the use of a key that had been supplied to Rachel in case of a true and dire emergency, seemed essential.
He returned to his bedroom and called her. What were you thinking?
he whisper-hissed into the phone. Whisper-hissing still did not come easily to him, but he was getting better at it every day. What if I’d gone out and not realized they were there?
"That’s why I texted you," she said. Her response to whisper-hissing was eye-rolling glibness.
Did you bring them here after midnight? Because I went to sleep at midnight.
I dropped them off at four. I was trying to get in for the weekend. There was a cancellation. The program starts at nine. Give me a break here, Toby. I’m having a hard time. I really need some me-time.
As if all her time weren’t completely and totally her-time.
You can’t pull this kind of shit, Rachel.
He only said her name at the end of sentences now, Rachel.
Why? You had them this weekend anyway.
But not till tomorrow morning!
Toby put his fingers to the bridge of his nose. "The weekends begin Saturday. This was your rule, not mine."
Did you have plans?
What does that even mean? What if there had been a fire, Rachel? What if there had been an emergency with one of my patients, and I ran out without knowing they were here?
But you didn’t. I’m sorry, I should have woken you up and told you they were there?
He thought of her waking him up, how it could have been catastrophic to his progress in understanding that she was no longer part of his waking up.
You shouldn’t have done it at all,
he said.
Well, if what you were saying last night is true, then you could have predicted this would happen.
Toby searched his bleary brain for their last hateful interaction and remembered it with the force of a sudden, deep dread: Rachel had been sputtering some nonsense about opening up a West Coast office of her agency, because she was not busy enough and overwhelmed enough as it was. Honestly, it was a blur. She’d ended the conversation, he remembered now, by screaming at him through her sobbing so that he couldn’t understand her until finally the line went dead and he knew she’d hung up on him. This was how conversations ended now, rather than with the inertia of marital apology. Toby had been told all his life that being in love means never having to say you’re sorry. But no, it was actually being divorced that meant never having to say you’re sorry.
This hasn’t been easy on me, Toby,
she said now. I get that I’m early. But all you have to do is drop them at camp. If you have plans, ask Mona to come. Why are we even still talking about this?
How could she not see that this wasn’t a small deal? He actually did have a date that night. He didn’t want to leave the kids with Mona—that was Rachel’s solution to everything, not his. He couldn’t seem to convey to her that he was a real person, that he was not a blinking cursor awaiting her instructions, that he still existed when she wasn’t in a room with him. He couldn’t understand what the goal of having all these agreements in place was if she wasn’t going to even pretend to adhere to them, or apologize when she didn’t. He’d given her a key to his new apartment not to pull shit like this, but so they could have something that was amicable. Amicable amicable amicable. Did you ever notice that you only use the word amicable in relation to divorce? Was it because it was so often used for divorce that you didn’t want to poison anything else with it? The way you could say malignant
for things other than cancer but you never did?
The kids were stirring and it was just as well because his boner was gone.
—
SOLLY, HIS NINE-YEAR-OLD, woke up, but Hannah, who was eleven, wanted to stay in bed. Sorry, kid, no dice,
Toby told her. We have to be out the door in twenty.
They stumbled into the kitchen with unfocused eyes, and Toby had to muck around in their bags to find the clothing they were supposed to wear for camp that day. Hannah snarled at him that he’d chosen the wrong outfit, that the leggings were for tomorrow, and so he held up her tiny red shorts and she swiped them out of his hands with the disgust of a person who was not committed to any consideration of scale when it came to emotional display. Then she flared her nostrils and stiffened her lips and told him somehow without opening her teeth that she had wanted him to buy Corn Flakes, not Corn Chex, the subtext being what kind of fucking idiot was she given for a father.
Solly, on the other hand, ate his Corn Chex cheerfully. He closed his eyes and shook his head with pleasure. Hannah,
he said. "You have to try these."
Toby was not above being grateful for Solly’s sad show of solidarity. Solly understood. Solly knew. Solly was his in a way that made him never wonder if all of this had been worth it. He had Toby’s same internal need for things to be okay. Solly wanted peace, just like his father. They even looked alike. They had the same black hair, the same brown eyes (though Solly’s were slightly larger than Toby’s and so gave the appearance of always being a little scared), the same comma-shaped nose, the same miniatureness—meaning not just that they were short, but they were short and regular-sized. They weren’t slight or diminutive, so that if you were to see them without a height benchmark, you wouldn’t understand just how short they were. This was good because it was hard enough to just be short. This was bad because it meant disappointing people who had seen you in just such a benchmark-deprived way and had expected you to be bigger.
Hannah was his, too, yes, except that she had Rachel’s straight blond hair and narrow blue eyes and sharp nose—her whole face an accusation, just like her mother’s. But she had a specific kind of sarcasm that was a characteristic of the Fleishman side. At least she once did. Her parents’ separation seemed to ignite in her a humorlessness and a fury that had already been coming either because her parents fought too often and too viciously, or because she was becoming a teenager and her hormones created a rage in her. Or because she didn’t have a phone and Lexi Leffer had a phone. Or because she had a Facebook account she was only allowed to use on the computer in the living room and she didn’t even want that Facebook account because Facebook was for old people. Or because Toby suggested that the sneakers that looked just like Keds but were $12 less were preferable to the Keds since again they were exactly the same just without the blue tag on the back and what about being too-overt victims of consumerism? Or because there was a sad popular song on the radio about a long-gone romance that meant a lot to her and he had asked her to turn down her speakers while he was on the phone with the hospital. Or because later when she explained why that sad popular song was so meaningful by making him listen to it she seethed at him because he didn’t appear to magically understand how a song could ignite in her a nostalgia that she couldn’t possibly have had, never having had a boyfriend. Or because he wondered if her skirt was too short to sit down in. Or because he wondered if her shorts were too short if they showed the crease between her buttocks and thighs and were even so short that their full pocket linings couldn’t be contained by them and so extended beyond the shorts’ hem. Or because he asked where her hairbrush was, which clearly implied, to her, that he thought her hair looked terrible. Or because she. did. not. want. to. see. The Princess Bride or any of his old-man movies. Or because he ran his hand across her head one day in a display of tenderness, ruining her very perfect middle part that had taken ten minutes to get right. Or because no. she. did. not. want. to. read The Princess Bride either, or any of his old-man books. Yes, her contempt for her parents, which seemed manageable when it was aimed at both Rachel and Toby, was absolutely devastating in its current concentration when it was directed only at him. He had no idea if she saved any of it for Rachel. All Toby knew was that Hannah could barely look at him without her lake-water eyes narrowing even further into lasers and her nose becoming somehow pointier than it was and her lips turning white with purse.
They inched toward camp, irate and unfocused, because they were tired (See, Rachel? See?).
"I hate camp, Hannah said.
Can’t I just stay home?" She’d wanted to go to sleepaway camp for the whole summer, but her bat mitzvah was in early October, and she had still needed June and July to learn her haftorah.
You’re leaving in like a week. One more lesson left.
"I want to leave now."
Should I maybe rent you an apartment in the interim?
Toby asked. Solly laughed at least.
They arrived at the 92nd Street Y, along with all the mothers in their brightly patterned leggings and their exercise shirts that said YOGA AND VODKA or EAT SLEEP SPIN REPEAT. This place cost about as much as sleepaway camp, and Hannah kept asking if she could skip being a camper and instead become some kind of counselor assistant, which you weren’t allowed to do until tenth grade anyway.
Even then, it still costs money to go,
Toby said when he looked at the Y’s website. Why do I have to pay for you to learn how to be a counselor while they use you as an actual counselor?
he’d asked her in the spring.
Why did you have to pay to learn how to be a doctor while they used you as an actual doctor?
she’d answered. It was a good point. Toby thought then how sharp she was, and how he wished she didn’t deploy this sharpness exclusively against him. She was becoming, it seemed to him, the kind of girl that it was completely exhausting to be.
They had made it with maybe six minutes to spare. The Y took them to a campus in the Palisades every day, and if you dropped them off too late, they had to spend the entire day in the room with the very little children. Hannah declined her father’s offer to escort her to her gathering classroom, so he took Solly to his. Toby watched him as he participated in the last minutes of the morning slime experiment, and was just about to exit the lobby when he heard his name being called.
Toby,
called a low, breathy woman’s voice.
Toby turned around to see Cyndi Leffer, a good friend of Rachel’s who had a daughter in Hannah’s grade. She took a moment to survey him. Ah, this. He knew what was coming: the head tilted twenty degrees, the exaggerated pout, the eyebrows simultaneously raised and furrowed.
"Toby. I keep meaning to reach out to you, Cyndi said.
We haven’t seen an inkling of you. She was wearing turquoise spandex leggings that had purple clawprints on the upper thighs, like a streak of purple tigers was climbing toward her crotch, trying to get to it. She wore a tank top that said SPIRITUAL GANGSTER. Toby remembered Rachel telling him that parents who sub out y’s for i’s in the middle of their girls’ names, and vice versa at the end, are not giving their daughters much of a chance in the world.
How are you doing? How are the kids doing?"
We’re okay,
he said. He tried to not adjust the angle of his head to match hers, but his mirror neurons were too well developed and he failed. We’re plugging along. It’s a change, for sure.
Her hair was dyed in that new way where the top was purposefully dark and it progressively faded until the ends were blond. But the dark part of the roots was too dark—it was the darkness of a younger woman—and against the border of her forehead all it did was accentuate the relative raggedness of her skin. He thought about a physical therapist he’d slept with a few weeks ago, about how she had the same hairstyle but that the dark part had a warmer cast to it and wasn’t so stark against her same-age-as-Cyndi skin.
Had things been hard for long?
she asked. Jenny. The physical therapist’s name was Jenny.
It wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment thing, if that’s what you’re asking.
Toby and Rachel had separated at the very beginning of June, just after school ended, the culmination of an almost yearlong process, or maybe a process that began shortly after their wedding fourteen years before; it depends whom you ask or how you look at a thing. Is a marriage that ends doomed from the start? Was the marriage over when the problems that would never get solved started or when they finally agreed that the problems couldn’t be solved or when other people finally learned about it?
Of course Cyndi Leffer wanted information. Everyone did. The conversations were always artless, and they were always the same. The first thing people wanted to know was how long things in the marriage had been bad for: Were you unhappy that night at the school gala, when you were showing off your college swing dancing lessons? Were you unhappy at that bat mitzvah when you took her hand and kissed it absentmindedly during the speeches? Was I right that at parent-teacher conferences when you stood by the coffee and she stood by the office checking her phone you were actually fighting? How it shook people to see someone extricate themselves from a bad situation; how people so brazenly wondered aloud every private thing there was to wonder. Toby’s cousin Cherry, who was prone to long, disappointed stares at her husband, Ron: Had you tried therapy?
His boss, Donald Bartuck, whose second wife had been a nurse on the hepatology floor: Were you unfaithful?
The camp director at the Y, when Toby was explaining that his kids might be a little shaky since when camp started, they’d just separated: Did you guys have a regular date night?
These questions weren’t really about him; no, they were questions about how perceptive people were and what they missed and who else was about to announce their divorce and whether the undercurrent of tension in their own marriages would eventually lead to their demise. Did the fight I had with my wife on our actual anniversary that was particularly vicious mean we’re going to get divorced? Do we argue too much? Do we have enough sex? Is everyone else having more sex? Can you get divorced within six months of an absentminded hand-kiss at a bat mitzvah? How miserable is too miserable?
How miserable is too miserable?
One day he would not be recently divorced, but he would never forget those questions, the way people pretended to care for him while they were really asking after themselves.
He had spent the early summer in a haze, trying to find footing in this strange world where every aspect of his life was just slightly different than it used to be and yet immensely so: He was sleeping, just alone and in a different bed. He was eating with the kids just like always—Rachel hadn’t come home before eight or nine on weeknights in years—but after dinner he dropped them off at the old apartment and walked the nineteen blocks home to his new one. That slippery fuck Donald Bartuck told him he, Bartuck, was being promoted to head of internal medicine and that he was putting Toby up as his only candidate for subdivision head of hepatology in the gastroenterology division once the current one, Phillipa London, evacuated the post to take Bartuck’s job. He didn’t have the natural first person to tell. He thought about calling me or Seth, but it seemed too pathetic to not have an actual family member to tell. He almost called his parents in Los Angeles, but the time difference put them at five A.M. when he learned; then he debated if this was news that Rachel should hear or know. (He did tell her, later when he dropped the kids off, and she smiled with her mouth but not her eyes. She did not have to pretend to care about his career anymore.)
But now, in late July, as summer was rounding second base, he felt steady again, like at least he had a routine. He was coming along nicely. He was adjusting. He was cooking for one less person. He was learning to use the I instead of we to indicate availability for barbecues and cocktail parties, when he was invited, which wasn’t often. He was taking long walks again and learning to bat away the feeling that he should let someone know where he was. Yes, he was coming along nicely, except for conversations like this one, with Cyndi. He had been wallpaper to the Cyndi Leffers of the world before this; he’d been a condition that came co-morbid with his family. Successful Rachel’s husband, or social Hannah’s father or cute Solly’s father, or, hey, you’re a doctor, right, will you just look at this bump I’ve had for a week? Now he was someone people wanted to talk to. His divorce had somehow given him a soul.
Cyndi was waiting for an answer. Her eyes were searching his face the way soap opera actors looked at each other in the seconds before commercial breaks. He knew what was expected of him. He was working on trying to not fill in this pause; he was working on letting the discomfort of the silence be the property of the person who was mining him for dirt. His therapist, Carla, was trying to get him to learn how to sit with uncomfortable feelings. He, in turn, was trying to get the people who were pumping him for information to learn to sit with uncomfortable feelings.
But also: There was no way to talk about a divorce without implying terrible things about the other person in the marriage, and he didn’t want to do that. He felt a strange call for diplomacy now. School was a battleground state, and it would be so easy to get people over to his side, he knew that. He knew he could allude to Rachel’s craziness, her anger, her tantrums, her unwillingness to immerse herself in her children’s lives—he could say things like I mean, I’m sure you noticed that she never came to STEM Night?
—but he didn’t want to. He didn’t want to undermine Rachel’s status at school out of an old sense of protectiveness that he couldn’t quite shake. She was a monster, yes, but she had always been a monster, and she was still his monster, for she had not yet been claimed by another, for he was still not legally done with her, for she still haunted him.
Cyndi took a step closer. He was only five-five, and she was a full head taller than him and skinnier than any woman needed to be. Her face was large-featured and pumped full of hyaluronic acid and botulinum toxin. Her concern, which was mostly transmitted via a slow back-and-forth shaking of the head and an exaggerated protrusion of her mouth, was mitigated by the fact that her browline was completely ossified, and had been since he’d known her. This was what she looked like when she was happy, too. Todd and I were so sad to hear,
she said. "If there’s anything we can do. We’re your friends, too."
Then she took another step closer, which was two too many steps close for a camp lobby encounter with a married woman who was friends with his wife. His phone buzzed. He looked down. It was Tess, a woman he had plans to meet for the first time later that night. He squinted at his phone to see a close-up photograph of the fertile crescent where her thighs and her black, netted panties formed a delta.
That’s work,
Toby said to Cyndi. I have a biopsy to get to.
You still at the hospital?
Uh, yeah,
he said. As long as people still get sick. Supply and demand.
Cyndi gave a one-syllable laugh but looked at him with, what? Sympathy? All the school parents did. A doctor wasn’t a thing to be anymore. Just last year Cyndi’s husband, Todd, had looked at him earnestly at parent-teacher conference night, while they waited outside classrooms for their names to be called (no Rachel in sight, because she was at a client dinner and would not arrive in time) and said, If your kids told you they wanted to be doctors, how would you advise them?
Toby hadn’t quite understood the question until his walk home from school, at which point he’d realized it was a guy in finance feeling sorry for a guy in medicine. A doctor! He had been raised to think that a doctor was a respectable thing to be. It was a respectable thing to be! When Rachel got home that night, he told her what that douche Todd had asked him, and she said, "Well, what would you say?" They had all turned on him.
You better get going, then,
Cyndi said now. We’ll see Hannah tomorrow night, right?
She leaned over to give him a full frontal three-point hug with connection at the head, chest, and pelvis. The hug lingered for a millisecond longer than any previous physical contact he’d ever had with Cyndi Leffer, which was zero.
He walked away from the Y, wondering if the vibe he got off Cyndi—that she wanted to comfort him, yes, but, also, to fuck him as well—was real. It couldn’t be. And yet. And yet. And yet and yet and yet and yet and yet she was clearly wondering what it might be like to fuck him.
No, it couldn’t be. He thought about the way her nipples lined up so evenly and soldier-like under her stupid tank top. He was getting carried away, which is an easy thing to do when your phone is literally dripping with the lust of women who did definitely and assuredly claim to want to fuck you, fuck you bad, fuck you bad all night long.
Each little holler he got—each little [winky emoji] or [purple devil emoji] or bra selfie or actual photographed upper-region ass crack—made him revisit the essential questions of his youth: Could it be that he wasn’t as repulsive as he’d been led to believe by the myriad rejections of just about every single girl he’d ever made eye contact with? Could it be that he was maybe attractive? Was it not his looks or his physique but the desperation inherent in his attempts at a rigorous sex life in those days, or any sex life really, that rendered him something less attractive than he actually was? Or maybe now there was something about his current situation, being newly divorced and a little wounded, that had somehow made him that way. Or maybe absent mirror neurons and pheromones and other things that could not penetrate phone screens, all you had was a reflection of the intersection of your own horniness and your own availability, and the minute someone else’s horniness and availability matched up with yours, voilà and kaboom. He didn’t like to think that, that sex was no longer about attraction, but he couldn’t pretend it wasn’t a possibility; he was a scientist, after all.
He’d met Rachel when he was a first-year in med school. He thought about that time nearly constantly now. He thought of the decisions he’d made and whether he could have seen the warning signs. Her at that library party, her eyes flashing sex, her hair the same blond Cleopatra shape it would continue to be forever. How his eyes filled at the sight of the gleam of her geometry hair. How the blue of her eyes was both cold and hot. How the Cupid’s bow beneath her nose was a dewdrop mountain to be climbed; how it mirrored the cleft in her chin with the kind of symmetry that science said initiated male sexual imperative and created visual gratification and hormonal feelings of well-being. How the sharpness of her face seemed like a correction to the Semitic girls he was bred to want—her father hadn’t been Jewish, and by the account of her grandmother and the few pictures that existed of him, she looked just like him, and that, too, felt dangerous—that someone raised as traditionally as Toby would love a woman who looked like her absent Gentile father. How he was made dizzy, how he utterly dissolved in lust, by the way she stuck a hip out when she was trying to decide something. How, after knowing him just four weeks, she came with him to California for his grandmother’s funeral; how she sat in the back and looked sad for him and came to the house afterward and helped put all the catered food on trays. The way she undressed him—no, he shouldn’t think about that now. Thinking about that would be detrimental to his healing.
The point was that she had wanted him. The point was that someone wanted Toby Fleishman. We’d watched him watch the world pass him by; we’d watched him bewilder at his inability to attract someone. He’d only had one real girlfriend before, and other than that, just some drunk girls he had rolled around on the floor with at parties; he’d had sex with just two women before Rachel. But then college was over and the girls in med school were almost all attached to some guy from before. And there had been Rachel, who didn’t look at him like he was too short or too pathetic, even though he was, he was. He looked across the room to her at that party, and she looked back at him and smiled. So much time had passed since then, and yet that was Rachel for him. He had spent so many years in the service of trying to relocate that Rachel within the Rachel that she kept proving herself to be. But even now, it was that version of Rachel that was the first that ever came to mind when he thought of her. He felt he would be doing worlds better if it weren’t.
—
IT WAS TRUE that Toby had a biopsy in forty-five minutes, but really he wanted to spend a little more time with his app, so as he walked out onto the street he opened it up and headed west. It was already too warm, just about at the forecasted ninety-four degrees with storm clouds, but nothing quite so dangerous or threatening yet.
In the park, the beautiful young people—they were all beautiful, even if they weren’t—would be lying out on blankets even this early, their heads tilted up toward the sun. Some of them were sleeping. Back when Rachel consented to go on long walks with him, they would make fun of the sleeping people in the park. Not the homeless people, or the strung-out ones. Just the ones who’d made their way over to the park in their sweatpants, laid out their blankets, and pretended that the world was a safe place that only wanted you to be well rested. Neither of them could imagine having so little anxiety that you could fall asleep in the middle of a park in Manhattan; the anxiety was a thing they had in common to the end. I can’t even imagine wearing sweatpants in public,
Rachel would say. She wore the leggings the other moms wore to exercise classes and the tank tops (BUT FIRST, COFFEE, read one of hers. Another: BRUNCH SO HARD), but those had their own professionalism to them. She felt that with all the alternatives to pants now—yoga pants, leggings, etc.—sweatpants had become an overt, if definitionally passive, statement on a woman’s state of mind. Sweatpants,
she always said. That’s just giving up.
As he walked, he hit the search function on his screen, where he found a sampling of the women nearby who were available for digital insertion and nipple stimulation and hand job execution and other adult activity at eight-thirty A.M. on a Friday: an Indian woman in her late forties holding an infant; a droopy-eyed white woman with black nails in her mid-forties sucking on a lollipop; one with orange-tan skin and pastel purple hair and tortoiseshell glasses; a pale woman of indeterminate age (but adult) with a pacifier in her mouth; a freckled woman’s cleavage (just her cleavage); a pale woman’s ass crack (just her ass crack); a pockmarked woman with scared eyes who wore a heavy layer of wrongly matched foundation that had the effect of spackle and a button-down shirt, whose mouth was tightlipped and betrayed a nervousness at the act of being photographed; a brunette whose hair was in two Swiss Miss braids and who was holding one of them across her upper lip to make a mustache; a silver-haired woman who looked to be his mother’s age holding a martini glass, a sliver of a man’s shoulder not cropped out completely. There were also the usual numerous women holding nieces and nephews to signal a kind of casually incidental maternalism in case the reviewer of the photo was looking, consciously or not, for a permanent situation instead of just some of that digital insertion, etc. He swiped right on a woman who’d angled her photo so that she was literally hanging off her bed at about her T6 vertebrae (right in the middle of her thoracic spine), the camera poised up and over, the valley between her maybe-saline-filled breasts like a canyon road.
There was something in him that liked the world as his dating app presented it, something that liked to