Thinking of Others: On the Talent for Metaphor
By Ted Cohen
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
In Thinking of Others, Ted Cohen argues that the ability to imagine oneself as another person is an indispensable human capacity--as essential to moral awareness as it is to literary appreciation--and that this talent for identification is the same as the talent for metaphor. To be able to see oneself as someone else, whether the someone else is a real person or a fictional character, is to exercise the ability to deal with metaphor and other figurative language. The underlying faculty, Cohen argues, is the same--simply the ability to think of one thing as another when it plainly is not.
In an engaging style, Cohen explores this idea by examining various occasions for identifying with others, including reading fiction, enjoying sports, making moral arguments, estimating one's future self, and imagining how one appears to others. Using many literary examples, Cohen argues that we can engage with fictional characters just as intensely as we do with real people, and he looks at some of the ways literature itself takes up the question of interpersonal identification and understanding.
An original meditation on the necessity of imagination to moral and aesthetic life, Thinking of Others is an important contribution to philosophy and literary theory.
Read more from Ted Cohen
Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Serious Larks: The Philosophy of Ted Cohen Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Thinking of Others
Titles in the series (22)
Hegel on Self-Consciousness: Desire and Death in the Phenomenology of Spirit Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When Is True Belief Knowledge? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPublic Goods, Private Goods Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Thinking of Others: On the Talent for Metaphor Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Welfare and Rational Care Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Social Conventions: From Language to Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Defense of Hume on Miracles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Philosophical Myths of the Fall Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Apologetics of Evil: The Case of Iago Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKant and Skepticism Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Self-Deception Unmasked Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Partiality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFixing Frege Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMichael Oakeshott's Skepticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhysicalism, or Something Near Enough Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Justice Is Conflict Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Locke on Personal Identity: Consciousness and Concernment - Updated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKierkegaard's Concept of Despair Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom, Resentment, and the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Taking Wittgenstein at His Word: A Textual Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
As If: Idealization and Ideals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cut of the Real: Subjectivity in Poststructuralist Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLocke on Personal Identity: Consciousness and Concernment - Updated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Nature and Conduct Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWelfare and Rational Care Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Before Our Eyes: New and Selected Poems, 1975–2017 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Economy of Hope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNarrating Evil: A Postmetaphysical Theory of Reflective Judgment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIce Cream Headache in my Bone Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMale Poets and the Agon of the Mother: Contexts in Confessional and Postconfessional Poetry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Sexuality and Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrowing Old in a New China: Transitions in Elder Care Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice Is Conflict Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kant and Skepticism Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Parfit: A Philosopher and His Mission to Save Morality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Apologetics of Evil: The Case of Iago Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs the Rectum a Grave?: and Other Essays Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Queer Visibility in Post-Socialist Cultures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anti-Social Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Novel Relations: Victorian Fiction and British Psychoanalysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Triangle of Representation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom, Resentment, and the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Physicalism, or Something Near Enough Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Giving an Account of Oneself Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Real American Ethics: Taking Responsibility for Our Country Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Philosophy and Melancholy: Benjamin's Early Reflections on Theater and Language Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Social Contract & Discourse on Inequality: Including Discourse on the Arts and Sciences & A Discourse on Political Economy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Is True Belief Knowledge? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica Observed: On an International Anthropology of the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Source: The Secrets of the Universe, the Science of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato's Republic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Laws of Connection: The Scientific Secrets of Building a Strong Social Network Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Thinking of Others
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Thinking of Others - Ted Cohen
THINKING OF OTHERS
PRINCETON MONOGRAPHS IN PHILOSOPHY
Harry G. Frankfurt, Editor
The Princeton Monographs in Philosophy series offers short
historical and systematic studies on a wide variety
of philosophical topics.
Justice Is Conflict by STUART HAMPSHIRE
Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency by GIDEON YAFFE
Self-Deception Unmasked by ALFRED R. MELE
Public Goods, Private Good by RAYMOND GEUSS
Welfare and Rational Care by STEPHEN DARWALL
A Defense of Hume on Miracles by ROBERT J. FOGELIN
Kierkegaard’s Concept of Despair by MICHAEL THEUNISSEN (TRANSLATED BY BARBARA HARSHAV AND HELMUT ILLBRUCK)
Physicalism, or Something Near Enough by JAEGWON KIM
Philosophical Myths of the Fall by STEPHEN MULHALL
Fixing Frege by JOHN P. BURGESS
Kant and Skepticism by MICHAEL N. FORSTER
Thinking of Others: On the Talent for Metaphor by TED COHEN
THINKING OF OTHERS
ON THE TALENT FOR METAPHOR
Ted Cohen
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS
PRINCETON AND OXFORD
Copyright © 2008 by Princeton University Press
Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street,
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street,
Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW
All Rights Reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Cohen, Ted.
Thinking of others : on the talent for metaphor / Ted Cohen.
p. cm. — (Princeton monographs in philosophy)
Includes index.
ISBN 978-0-691-13746-9 (cloth : alk. paper)
1. Metaphor. 2. Empathy. I. Title.
PN228.M4C58 2008
808—dc22 2008014920
British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available
This book has been composed in Janson Typeface
Printed on acid-free paper. ∞
press.princeton.edu
Printed in the United States of America
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
This book is for Andy Austin Cohen
SHE DOES A BETTER JOB OF THINKING OF OTHER
PEOPLE THAN ANYONE ELSE I KNOW, DOING IT WITH
UNDERSTANDING AND GENEROSITY BUT WITHOUT
EVER BEING FOOLISH. LIKE ALL PEOPLE, ANDY IS
UNIQUE; AND SHE IS MORE SO.
Contents
Acknowledgments
CHAPTER ONE
The Talent for Metaphor
CHAPTER TWO
Being a Good Sport
CHAPTER THREE
From the Bible: Nathan and David
CHAPTER FOUR
Real Feelings, Unreal People
CHAPTER FIVE
More from the Bible: Abraham and God
CHAPTER SIX
More Lessons from Sports
CHAPTER SEVEN
Oneself Seen by Others
CHAPTER EIGHT
Oneself as Oneself
CHAPTER NINE
Lessons from Art
CHAPTER TEN
The Possibility of Conversation, Moral and Otherwise
CHAPTER ELEVEN
Conclusion: In Praise of Metaphor
Index
Acknowledgments
Some of the material in this book was published in earlier, different versions, under different titles. Metaphor, Feeling, and Narrative
was published in Philosophy and Literature, vol. 21, no. 2 (October, 1997), pp. 223–44. Identifying with Metaphor: Metaphors of Personal Identification
was delivered as the presidential address to the American Society for Aesthetics in 1998, and subsequently published in the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 57, no. 4 (Fall, 1999), pp. 399–409. Stories
was delivered as the presidential address to the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association in 2007, and subsequently published in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 81, no. 2 (November, 2007), pp. 33–48.
This small text is much better for having been reviewed by three of the best readers I know, Stanley Bates, Stanley Cavell, and David Hills.
Stanley Bates was once my colleague and has been my friend for decades. Except for Howard Stein, I believe Bates reads and knows more than anyone else I know. He showed me that my central idea is connected to more topics, themes, and problems than I had realized.
Stanley Cavell was once my teacher and has been my friend ever since. Years ago I had the privilege of writing and reading out the citation for him when Cavell received an honorary degree, and I hit on what I thought and think a fitting ascription when I said that he has the courage of his affections. It is this model that has made it possible for eccentrics like me to pursue what appeals to us while supposing that we are still philosophers. In the case of this book, it is Cavell who made me understand that I am taken with and speaking of metaphor not in the narrow sense of that word, but in a much more expanded and ambitious sense, a point that has made my project more difficult and more interesting.
David Hills is a rarity, an absolutely first-class analytical philosopher who reads what you write as if he were a master literary reader. I once published a pair of essays together, one autobiographical and the other straightforwardly analytical, leaving completely unexplained how those two pieces might go together. Whatever success those essays enjoyed, I think almost all readers took them to be independent and separable. When I later met Hills he made clear that he had found exactly why they go together. In reading this manuscript, Hills found more than a few lapses, places in which I settled for a nice idea and a pleasant phrase without supplying a foundation that would support them.
It was a pleasure, of course, and also a relief to know that those three thought the material worth sending out. If you do not think so, you might blame them a little, but you should mainly hold me responsible.
THINKING OF OTHERS
CHAPTER ONE
The Talent for Metaphor
Nonetheless, I agree that there is a pictorial dimension to metaphor and that the perspective it generates cannot be expressed propositionally.
—JOSEF STERN¹
We may, therefore, regard the metaphorical sentence as a Duck-Rabbit
; it is a sentence that may simultaneously be regarded as presenting two different situations; looked at one way, it describes the actual situation, and looked at the other way, an hypothetical situation with which that situation is being compared.
—ROGER WHITE²
There is mystery at the heart of metaphor. During the past several years a number of capable authors have done much to clarify the topic, and they have shown that some earlier central theses about the nature of metaphor are untenable.³ What they have shown, in particular, is that the import of a significant metaphor cannot be delivered literally, that is, in general, that a metaphorical statement has no literal statement that is its equivalent.
It may or may not be prudent to regard the import of a metaphor as a meaning. If it is, then a metaphorical sentence has two meanings, one literal and one metaphorical. If not, then there is only one meaning, the literal meaning, and the metaphorical import has to be understood in another way. But in either case there will be a metaphorical import that a competent audience will grasp. How the audience does this is, in the end, a mystery.
In the case of a metaphor of the form ‘A is B’, some comparison is indicated of the properties of A with the properties of B. An early idea, persistent at least since Aristotle, is that this comparison can be made explicit in a formulation of the form ‘A is like B’ and this leads to the further idea that the import of the metaphor can be expressed as an explicit, literal comparison of A with B.
Both ideas are mistaken, the second more seriously misleading than the first. The first idea, on its face, is simply and wildly implausible. In general, and certainly in the case of literal statements, ‘A is B’ and ‘A is like B’ are not equivalent. For instance, ‘Aristotle is like Plato’ is true: they are both Greek, both Athenians, both philosophers, both long dead, &c, while ‘Aristotle is Plato’ is false. There is no compelling reason to think that this obvious nonequivalence disappears when ‘A is B’ happens to be a metaphor, unless, of course, it were the case that a metaphor ‘A is B’ is somehow, perhaps by convention, to be understood as an alternative formulation of the literal simile ‘A is like B’, and there seems no good reason to suppose this to be the case.
The second idea is that the ‘A is like B’ associated with the metaphor ‘A is B’ is not itself metaphorical but is literal, and as seductive as this idea has been, it is mistaken. The mistake can be exposed using the useful if timeworn example ‘Juliet is the sun’. If the import of Romeo’s declaration were a literal comparison expressed in ‘Juliet is like the sun’, then the relevant comparison would be of properties literally possessed by both Juliet and the