The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord A paper read (in substance) before the confraternity of the Holy Trinity at Cambridge
()
Related to The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord A paper read (in substance) before the confraternity of the Holy Trinity at Cambridge
Related ebooks
God, Freedom, and the Body of Christ: Toward a Theology of the Church Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Virgin Birth of Our Lord Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Christian Faith: An Introduction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUpon This Rock: The Nature of Doctrine from Antifoundationalist Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Law of the Eucharist: Radbertus vs. Ratramnus—Their Controversy as to the Nature of the Eucharist Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Love Your Neighbour's Church as Your Own: A Manifest For Christian Unity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat is Biblical Eschatology? (An Extremely Brief Primer) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAncient Apologetic Exegesis: Introducing and Recovering Theophilus’s World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuestioning the Incarnation: Formulating a Meaningful Christology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTHE UNIQUE CHRIST FOR SALVATION THE CHALLENGE OF THE NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS AND CULTURES: Revised Edition 2019 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Beloved Disciple Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPower, Service, Humility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Church and the Barbarians: Being an Outline of the History of the Church from A.D. 461 to A.D. 1003 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResurrection, Scripture, and Reformed Apologetics: A Test for Consistency in Theology and Apologetic Method Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPURSUIT OF WISDOM: The Quest for Truth, Understanding, Goodness, Justice, Beauty & Love Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Prescientific Bible: Cultural Influences On the Biblical Writers and How They Affect Our Reading of the Bible Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLandmarks in the History of Early Christianity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Concept of Nature in the Thought of John Philoponus And Other Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Underwater Basilica of Nicaea: Archaeology in the Birthplace of Christian Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Defense of Doctine: Evangelicalism, Theology, and Scripture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Presbyterian Polity for Church Leaders, Fourth Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Jesus God? Let the Bible Unfold Its Own Mysteries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResurrection in Retrospect: A Critical Examination of the Theology of N. T. Wright Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMake America Christian Again Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Calvinism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Written Word Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPredestination:The Pharaoh Account of Grace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAspects of Forgiveness: The Basis for Justification and its Modern Denial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Story of Beginnings: Listening to the Bible’s Introduction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord A paper read (in substance) before the confraternity of the Holy Trinity at Cambridge
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord A paper read (in substance) before the confraternity of the Holy Trinity at Cambridge - B. W. (Berkeley William) Randolph
Project Gutenberg's The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord, by B. W. Randolph
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: The Virgin-Birth of Our Lord A paper read (in substance) before the confraternity of the Holy Trinity at Cambridge
Author: B. W. Randolph
Release Date: March 19, 2005 [EBook #15412]
Language: English
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE VIRGIN-BIRTH OF OUR LORD ***
Produced by Michael Madden
THE VIRGIN-BIRTH OF OUR LORD
A PAPER READ (IN SUBSTANCE) BEFORE THE CONFRATERNITY OF THE HOLY TRINITY AT CAMBRIDGE
BY
B. W. RANDOLPH, D.D.
PRINCIPAL OF ELY THEOLOGICAL, COLLEGE
HON, CANON OF ELY
EXAMINING CHAPLAIN TO THE BISHOP OF LINCOLN
Tu ad liberandum suscepturus hominem: non horruisti
Virginis uterum.
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND Co., 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY
1903
WITH RESPECT AND AFFECTION TO
VINCENT HENRY STANTON, D.D.
ELY PROFESSOR OF DIVINITY IN THE
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Dedisti Jesum Christum, Filium tuum unicum, ut . . . pro nobis nasceretur qui, operante Spiritu Sancto, verus Homo factus est ex substantia Virginis Marie matris sue.
Pref. in Die Nat. Dom.
PREFACE
This paper was read before the S. T. C. (Sanctae Trinitatis Confraternitas) on March 10th of this years at one of the ordinary meetings of the Brotherhood. It is published now in the hope that it may thus reach a wider circle.
To suppose that any one can hold the Catholic doctrine of the Incarnation without believing the miraculous Conception and Birth, is, in the writer's opinion, a delusion. There is no trace in Church History, so far as he is aware, of any believers in the Incarnation who were not also believers in the Virgin-Birth. The modern endeavour to divorce the one from the other appears to be part of the attempt now being made to get rid of the miraculous altogether from Christianity.
Professor Harnack appears to urge us to accept the Easter message
while we need not, he thinks, believe the Easter faith.
* He means apparently by this that we can deny the literal fact of our Lord's Resurrection, while we may believe in a future life. What St. Paul would really have said to a Christianity such as this seems to be plain from his words to the Corinthian converts who were denying the Resurrection in his day: If Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.
(I Cor. xv. 14.)
— * Harnack, What is Christianity? p. 160. —
Deny the Resurrection of our Lord, and you take away the key-stone from the Apostolic preaching, and the whole edifice falls to the ground. Any unprejudiced reader of the sermons and speeches of St. Peter and St. Paul in the Acts will surely recognize how true this is.
Similarly in regard to the human Birth of our Lord. Once admit that He was born as other men, and the Incarnation fades away. A child born naturally of human parents can never be God Incarnate. There can be no new start given to humanity by such a birth. The entail of original sin would not be cut off nor could the Christ so born be described as the Second Adam—the Lord from heaven.
Christians could not look to such a one as their Redeemer or Saviour, still less as the Author to them of a new spiritual life.
Another man would have appeared among men, giving mankind the example of a beautiful human life, but unable in any other way to benefit the race of men. Further, a Christ such as this would not