Q I am in the market for a new rifle. It will definitely be a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight, but I am undecided between getting it in standard .270 Win. or .270 WSM. I’ve read elsewhere that a 150gn AccuBond from a .270 WSM drops 6.8” less than a 140gn AccuBond from a standard .270 out at 500yds and hits with 268ft-lb more energy at that range. On paper at least, the .270 WSM looks to be harder hitting on game, but I find it hard to believe that the short magnum will kill game any deader than will the old .270 if both bullets land in the right place. What do you think about my choice of rifle and cartridge?
Joe Wiseman
A I cannot argue against your choice of rifle as I am a Model 70 fan from way back. The latest classic version of the Model 70 Featherweight is, in my opinion, the best so far. Its appearance, fit and finish are excellent, far superior to anything that’s gone before. It balances nicely offhand and accuracy is hard to fault.
As far as the cartridge itself is concerned, my impressions of the .270 WSM are a bit of a mixed bag. Sure, it’s more powerful, a bit flatter shooting and inherently accurate. On the downside, it’s more lively to shoot and harder to control than say, a 7mm Rem Mag and has more recoil. Any edge it has over 500yd doesn’t interest me much as I
