Paul - Thanks for sharing. As you know, I'm an American living and working in London. I've been here for 20+ years. I did undergrad studies at the University of Washington in Seattle, the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland and UM in Munich, Germany.
Most of my two decades of work in London were dedicated to launching and running my own ventures - I started my first company in 2008 when I was 40 years old. I'll be 56 in September.
Here's my high-level take: Things here feel small.
- Budgets
- Mindsets
- Ambitions
- Investments
- Risk appetites
- The list goes on
I know. That's harsh and unfair to the many very ambitious entrepreneurs who have taken outsized risks, raised millions of £/$/€ and have built phenomenal businesses.
And it's a little unfair to the investor community.
But, the numbers speak for themselves. There are too few entrepreneurs and there is too little capital to fund their ideas (hopefully really big ones).
Two specific things come to mind that might help move this narrative forward and, in some small way, help to address the problems noted by Tom.
1. Secondary Schools
I've heard from my kids, both in the same secondary state school in Hackney, say that their teachers are harping on about the relationship between school attendance and test scores and successful university applications and netting jobs as lawyers, accountants, bankers and related post-graduation.
Someone started the companies that employ these people, right?
Perhaps our secondary education system needs to emphasise and encourage our children to see entrepreneurial pursuits as real and exciting paths to take as well, with a big focus on software, cloud computing, cybersecurity, data and AI, which should be strategic national priorities.
2. Investment
The current government-backed SEIS and EIS tax relief programmes may need to be revamped/replaced to prevent the entrenchment of market-distorting, risk-averse and tax relief-centric class of investors. I know, this is heresy. And, I'll admit, my current company and a handful of UK investors have benefited from these programmes, but I'm worried that these programmes may be hurting more than helping the mid/longer term health and prosperity of the the UK startup ecosystem.
In my case, I've decided that my venture's next financing - pursuing it now - will no longer participate in UK tax relief programmes. UK investors will need to be all in, just like non-UK investors, who currently make up 67% of £1.2 million raised to date.
Risk appetites need to change. High net worth business leaders and individuals, corporates, VCs, universities, other institutions and, yes, government bodies, too, can all play a role in converting today's sluggish, safe, risk-averse startup ecosystem into something far more vibrant and productive.
Yes, it will mean more failures and pain and disappointment (shit happens), but it will also produce more [global] successes.
I think it's worth it.
James
5
4 Comments