Dr Fiona Pathiraja-Møller

Proud to see getUBetter awarded research funding from the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Invention for Innovation (i4i) programme in partnership with University of the West of England (UWE) and NHS Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire (BNSSG) integrated care system (ICS) https://lnkd.in/eKFQqhQR The funding will enable the company to evaluate the effectiveness of its digital self-management technology for non-specific low back pain across an entire ICS care pathway. > Non-specific low back pain affects a significant proportion of the UK’s population, impacting people’s daily lives, work, and the economy. Over a lifetime, 84% of people experience low back pain and, at any given time, around 15% of the population is affected. It accounts for 5% of all GP appointments, adding pressure on the already strained NHS. National guidelines strongly recommend early self-management as an effective approach to managing non-specific low back pain. > getUBetter is already widely used across the NHS, providing self-management support for all common musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and conditions to 17 ICSs and a total eligible population of 20 million people. Delivering digital self-management across entire care pathways, getUBetter is embedded alongside routine care. It ensures patients can access local support wherever they seek help, from the community to primary care and hospitals. > getUBetter’s solutions are underpinned by evidence-based, real-world evaluations and NICE Early Value Assessment (EVA) approval, demonstrating their ability to support the NHS’s key priorities: Transitioning from analogue to digital care. Shifting from hospital-centric to community-based care. Moving from reactive treatment to preventative approaches. > The NIHR i4i research funding will further support getUBetter in evaluating the impact of the service on patients, clinicians, and the health system, as well as looking at the cost-effectiveness of integrating digital self-management support for non-specific low back pain into ICS MSK clinical pathways. The research will also explore implementation challenges with the aim of providing transferable insights to support broader digital adoption across the NHS. > The funding supports late-stage innovations, enabling companies to generate the evidence required for full NICE approval and accelerating adoption within the NHS. It is part of NIHR’s efforts to bring cutting-edge technologies into routine NHS practice, enabling patients to benefit sooner and helping the UK maintain its position as a global leader in healthcare innovation. #getUbetter #NHS #NIHR #NICE #UWE #BNSSG #i4i #HealthTech #DigitalHealth #HealthIT https://lnkd.in/eKFQqhQR

16

1 Comment

I'm delighted to announce our latest guest on The 1% Podcast: Roman Yampolskiy, a leading computer scientist at the University of Louisville known for his pioneering work on AI safety, behavioural biometrics, and cyber world security. Roman's academic journey began with a PhD from the University at Buffalo, and he has since established himself as a thought leader in the field of artificial intelligence. His research delves into the existential risks of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), highlighting the urgent need for robust AI safety measures. Roman's insights into the potential threats of self-improving AI systems, the challenges of AI control, and the implications of AI deception are crucial in today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape. In this episode, Roman discusses the potential risks associated with AGI, including existential and suffering risks, and explores the timeline to achieving AGI. He elaborates on the concept of the AGI Turing Test and the pressing need for AI control and verification mechanisms. Roman also addresses the controversial topics of AI fearmongering and the ethical considerations of pausing AI development to ensure safety. Roman shares his thoughts on the current state of AI, the potential for AI deception, and the importance of creating safe and aligned AI systems. We also touch on fascinating subjects like AI's potential to influence human life, Neuralink, and the broader implications for the future of humanity. Join us for an engaging conversation that covers the critical aspects of AI safety and the future of artificial intelligence. This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in the intersection of technology, ethics, and the future of our society. Listen here: https://lnkd.in/esk4yp7f Sign up for our newsletter here: https://lnkd.in/df_ThGsp #AI #business #management Steering Point

6

1 Comment

Health Innovation Network (HIN) South London Welcomes 21 Innovators to Cohort Two of the Innovate UK and Medical Research Council Funded Accelerating FemTech Programme – DigitalHealth.London - DigitalHealth.London Exciting developments in women's health innovation! The Health Innovation Network (HIN) South London has launched Cohort Two of the Accelerating FemTech programme, welcoming 21 groundbreaking companies focused on addressing diverse women's health needs. This year saw a 42% increase in applications, underscoring the growing momentum in the FemTech sector, which is set to transform healthcare for over 51% of the population. With tailored support and mentorship, these innovators are poised to drive systemic change and economic growth in the UK. #FemTech #HealthcareInnovation #WomensHealth #DigitalHealth #HealthTech #Innovation #HealthEquity ai.mediformatica.com #health #femtech #london #digital #digitalhealthlondon #innovation #healthinnovation #network #programme #medical #healthinnovationnetwork #healthinnovationnetworkhinsouthlondon #healthit #healthtech #healthcaretechnology @MediFormatica (https://buff.ly/3OgxE3d)

1

Who do I contact if I have a new idea for the NHS? There are a few ways digital health innovators can engage with the NHS about new ideas 💡 but without a bit of digging it is not really clear where to go, or where to start, so I am listing here in case it is useful for anyone: 🔗 The NHS Innovation Service offers free advice and a free review and introduction service to other NHS organisations - https://innovation.nhs.uk. 🔗 NHS England run monthly surgeries for innovators to meet with members of their digital innovation team - https://lnkd.in/eWrTgwfN. 🔗 If you have a problem, rather than a solution/product, you can speak to the NHS England Innovation Lab - https://lnkd.in/e5zDsC9D. 🔗 If you are in Yorkshire you can't beat engaging with Health Innovation Yorkshire & Humber for help, advice, introductions, and the Propel@YH accelerator program offering support and guidance to fuel growth - https://lnkd.in/eJchupdt - reach out to Tim East, Ferdinand Rex, or Neville Young. 🔗 If you are based in other parts of there country there will be an NHS Health Innovation Network near you, the full list is here - https://lnkd.in/e6PZE3Fe. 🔗 If you are in Leeds there is also the Innovation Pop Up at the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, which is an area where companies can connect and work collaboratively with the Trust’s clinicians and innovation team - https://lnkd.in/eX8ASVwE. 🔗 Another one for Leeds (sorry I am biased!) is of course Leeds Digital Health - a great networking event to meet with other innovators and NHS organisations - https://lnkd.in/evKwYHby. I might have missed some here 🤔 are there any more to add to the list?

232

42 Comments

Congratulations to the getUBetter team for securing National Institute for Health and Care Research and Office for Life Sciences funding for our innovative digital self-management support platform https://lnkd.in/dpXKRkMC NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research) and the Office for Life Sciences (OLS) have funded 7 new research projects aimed at bringing new technologies into the NHS to benefit patients. Health innovation provides critical solutions to key challenges faced by the health system, and as part of the health and growth missions action is being taken across government to ensure this innovation makes it into the hands of patients who need it. The seven projects funded include research into digitally-enabled cognitive behavioural therapies, digital tools to support weight loss and low back pain, and virtual reality therapy for severe mental health difficulties. These products have been identified as promising medical technologies that meet a national unmet need, with the potential to have most impact and add value to patients and the health and care system. The funded teams will be gathering real world evidence for their products. This will help to accelerate adoption of these technologies, which have been recommended for early use in the NHS through the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Early Value Assessment and contribute to creating an NHS fit for the future. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of digital technology for low back pain Dr Alice Berry, University of the West of England, Bristol There are many digital tools to support people with low back pain, but it’s not clear how well they work. This project will assess if the getUBetter app helps to improve pain and patients’ ability to engage with daily activities, and whether it offers good value for money for the NHS. #HealthTech #DigitalHealth #HealthIT #getUbetter #NIHR #OLS #NICE #MSK #DigitalMSK #NHS #UWE #LowBackPain #DigitalTechnology       https://lnkd.in/dpXKRkMC

8

1 Comment

London-based health tech startup QuestPrehab has recently partnered with NHS Providers to deliver digital prehabilitation services across NHS trusts in England. This collaboration aims to support patients in preparing for surgery through digital health programmes, potentially reducing recovery times, minimising hospital stays, and easing pressures on NHS staff. The Role of NHS Providers in Facilitating Innovation NHS Providers serves as a dedicated membership organisation representing NHS trusts and foundation trusts in England. Through initiatives like the Connect partnership, NHS Providers fosters collaborations between NHS trusts and external organisations, enabling joint projects, enhancing visibility, and providing speaking opportunities at conferences and events. Contrast with Wales In Wales, the healthcare landscape differs. The Welsh NHS Confederation represents all NHS organisations, including both commissioners and providers, under a single umbrella. While this comprehensive structure ensures unified representation, it may present challenges in rapidly implementing provider-specific innovations across diverse local health boards. Notably, there doesn't appear to be an equivalent to the NHS Providers' Connect partnership in Wales, which could facilitate similar collaborations. Key Takeaways The partnership between QuestPrehab and NHS Providers highlights the advantages of having a focused, provider-specific organisation that can swiftly implement health innovations at a national level. For Wales, this raises important questions: Could establishing a more specialised, provider-focused body support faster adoption and broader implementation of health innovations within the NHS in Wales? With digital health advancements on the rise, such a model might enable more agile and efficient solutions tailored to the unique healthcare challenges in Wales. #DigitalHealth #Prehabilitation #NHSProviders #QuestPrehab #HealthInnovation #NHSWales #HealthcareTransformation #PatientCare #Wales https://lnkd.in/eQ28fAhJ

3

What are the challenges of clinical evidence generation for HealthTech companies? I spoke yesterday with a brilliant panel on the Healthcare Innovation symposium organised by the Living Laboratory. Here are 3 challenge that founders have to navigate: 1. 𝐃𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲. This is step one of any evidence generation activity. Innovators have to search high and low for a clinical centre to conduct their research to evidence the use of their product. Often this requires a lot of relationship building, form filling and hoop jumping. But finding the right partner can make a world of difference. (Because of point 2) 2. 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬. Running clinical studies is expensive.  There is no other way around it. Innovators need to find ways to raise funds for their evidence generation activity. At the early stage, this means GRANTS. Partnerning with the right academic institution or NHS trust can lend significant credence to your application. Applying alone as a SME will always be not as strong compared to another with the backing of a well known trust. 3. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬. The planning and running of clinical studies is a lot more complex than one would think. - Designing and writing clinical protocols. - Navigating ethics and caldicott approval. - Statistical analysis of clinical data. - Academic writing and publishing. Are all skillsets that are not easy to obtain. Unless a healthtech founder or their founding team comes from an academic background, it is tremendously difficult to navigate all the above alone. Having access to such expertise from the beginning makes the difference between a well designed study that is celebrated or a poorly run study that is rejected. ________________________________ The Digital Health Validation Lab has been established to help innovators overcome the above challenges. Unique in its approach, the DHVL combines the academic pedigree of University of Glasgow and the clinical background of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to support evidence generation activities in a very powerful way. Be it co-applying for grants, serving as a clinical site for research, providing academic rigor for publications - the DHVL can support you. (P.S. This is not a sponsored post in any way, just my objective observation) If you are a founder looking for support - do reach out to Ruth McLaughlin and David Lowe! 👇 What other organisations would you recommend that can help founders substantially with evidence generation? Sean Duncan | Kathleen Boyd | Hassan Chaudhury HonFAPM | Steven Bagshaw | Nara Moripen | Anna Muñoz Farré |

32

13 Comments

📣 Last week the Centre for Sectoral Economic Performance at Imperial College London partnered with the Imperial Policy Forum to host a ‘HealthTech Bootcamp’, bringing together industry, policymakers, regulators, and local government representatives to discuss strategies for bolstering the UK’s health technology sector 🚀 This was the first of a series of sector-specific bootcamps, focused on CSEP's core mission to improve the competitiveness of the UK economy by promoting evidence-driven policies that drive growth, enhance productivity and support the development of high-growth sectors like health technology. This follows the new CSEP and ABHI HealthTech sector strategy, highlighting HealthTech’s £13bn Gross Value Added (GVA) in the UK. The report proposes targeted tax incentives, regulatory reforms, and closer collaboration with the NHS to accelerate innovation adoption. Looking forward to bootcamps on the fine chemicals, telecoms and automotive sectors in the coming months! Read more here 👇 #HealthTech #Growth #Innovation #Industrialstrategy https://lnkd.in/exEGq8hM

13

The NHS is increasingly focusing on health inequalities, thanks in no small part to the efforts of people such as Prof. Bola Owolabi, MRCGP MFPH(Hon), FRSPH.    The Health Foundation notes that inequality is expected to rise, whilst BME Leadership Network members at NHS Confederation note that racial inequalities persist within NHS services.     Health and care leaders are acting, as seen in SWSCU analysis of the Joint Forward Plans published by integrated care systems. Regions are collaborating to reduce the gap in inequalities, and there are efforts to embed anti-racism within NHS operations.    We welcome this focus on reducing inequality, and we are working with customers such as Karen Dawber at Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to reduce inequality in line with NHS England’s operational plans.     We also flag the need to reduce health inequity.     Understanding the difference between both is crucial. Equality means everyone gets the same; equity means everyone gets what they need. For some groups, health equity might mean providing extra support.    Language barriers can prevent individuals from seeking appropriate medical care, resulting in delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment, and poorer health outcomes.    By bridging the gap between clinicians and patients with additional communication needs, CardMedic is helping to provide more inclusive, more equitable healthcare for all.      Take a look at the differences between health inequity and inequality. We need to focus on both delivering the same result - excellent healthcare for all.  https://lnkd.in/dnbvPbsP HT Abdul Rahyead 

19

3 Comments

All you need is an explanation? 🗣 ❓   I enjoyed the latest joint RSM Digital Health Section and @Dev&Doc podcast featuring Dr Annabelle Painter, Dr Josh Au Yeung, Zeljko K. on #XAI.   𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: 🧠 We need to trust a solution to accept it's decisions, and part of trust is understanding why - therein lies why we find explainability so important but actually it really boils down to our ability/willingness to trust?   🧠 We frequently use the terms ‘#explainability’ and ‘#interpretability’ with respect to AI as interchangeable, but they mean 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 things (see: https://lnkd.in/eKuNMbXx.)   🧠 When we talk about explainable AI – do we mean explainable for each decision or how the system as a whole is working or both? And are they equally important? Also, could we even understand it or find it relevant (e.g. complex mathematical reasoning).   🧠 Whilst we expect AI to be explainable, is this a double standard when we don’t even know sometimes how humans make decisions? 🤷‍♀️ When referring for specialists/tests sometimes we have ☑ that says ‘clinical concern’ for when we can’t explain why a patent needs help – so if we can’t always explain our own intuition and make allowances for that, maybe we need to for AI? 🤔   💡 Fascinating point re: whether having an explanation makes doctors more likely to accept a false result. So could this actually worsen our over-reliance to AI? 😨  Something I saw raised in a Nature letter here published on explainable AI in dermatology. Interesting debate - article: https://lnkd.in/eG8AW_DS  Letter: https://lnkd.in/eYMCuTgv, Response: https://lnkd.in/ebZX_hhS   👩 I agree that sometimes we do anthropomorphise AI and treat it like a human than a tool and that expectation could be dangerous. Lauren Oakden-Rayner gave a lecture several years back and discussed a 2015 study about how pigeons 🐦 could detect breast cancer on pathology images (https://lnkd.in/eD3beHN2 😂 ) and argued how they could be seen as a kind of ‘model’ outputting binary classification with high accuracy but we’d never dream of thinking of a 🐦 = 👩, yet we do this comparison with AI.   🤖 The topic of human-AI interaction and decision making cropped up a few times as an area of much needed research – although I’m certain there must be a lot out there given all the courses/degrees/jobs related to #HCI and #UX? No?   Anyway - lovely episode! Would enjoy hearing from anyone working on exciting projects that cross behavioural & social science / medtech. Always a fan of Freakonomics and how predictably unpredictable we can be with decision making…!

10

3 Comments

🔍 Just reviewed a fascinating report on uniting the UK's health data systems - a critical blueprint for the future of healthcare delivery and research. The UK has a goldmine of health data covering 67 million people through the NHS, with records dating back to the 1950s. However, we need to fully leverage this incredible resource due to fragmented systems and complex data governance. Why This Matters: Integrating health data systems isn't just about efficiency but saving lives. Imagine a healthcare ecosystem where: - Your GP instantly accesses your complete medical history - Researchers can quickly identify patterns across millions of patient records - AI systems can predict health trends before they become critical - Social care and healthcare data work seamlessly together Real-World IoT Example: Smart home sensors are revolutionizing preventive care. Consider this scenario: Motion sensors and smart devices in an elderly person's home can: - Track daily movement patterns - Monitor sleep quality - Detect changes in bathroom visit frequency - Measure home temperature and humidity - Note changes in eating habits through smart appliance usage When these patterns deviate from average, the system can alert healthcare providers about potential health issues before they become emergencies. The future of healthcare lies in connected data systems. We must support initiatives that break down silos and create a more integrated, efficient, and life-saving healthcare ecosystem. #HealthTech #DigitalTransformation #Healthcare #DataScience #IoT

3

Digital Health Unplugged Podcast: Why is the NHS so difficult to sell to? https://lnkd.in/emEnAtY6 Jordan Sollof, reporter at Digital Health News, is joined by Lloyd Price and Mohammad Al-Ubaydli to talk about procurement and why the NHS is so difficult to sell to. From their own experience, Price, a HealthTech founder, M&A advisor for Nelson Advisors and Non-Executive Director for various Digital Health companies, and Al-Ubaydli, Founder and Chief Executive of Digital Health social enterprise, Patients Know Best, shine a light on the main issues that can make selling to the NHS a challenge. The pair discuss success stories of startups which have successfully sold to the NHS, before assessing whether companies and suppliers need to take more care in ensuring they are pitching the right solution to the right organisation. They give their views on whether the NHS procurement process has become overcomplicated, a point raised in a session at Rewired 2024, and speculate whether the forthcoming Procurement Act (which was originally due to come into force in October 2024, but has been delayed until February 2025) will solve some issues and make it easier for those selling in the health technology sector. Finally, the guests predict what they anticipate will happen in the coming months and years, including whether the NHS will become a simpler system as a whole to sell to or if we will still be having the same conversation about difficulties selling in a few years’ time https://lnkd.in/emEnAtY6

14

4 Comments

Health and #medtech industry leaders are assessing the implications of a £22.6 billion uplift in funding for the NHS this year and next, and a £3.4 billion boost for capital spending next year: https://lnkd.in/eAJ7KDZ2 #healthtech #budget24

5

Check out what our very own Jonathan Hinchliffe has to say about the Autumn Budget in Health Tech World's latest article! 👇 #HealthTech #AutumnBudget #Budget #Healthcare #NHS

4

Our HealthTech Ecosystem is a village. Here are some helpful villagers and why: 1. Hassan Chaudhury HonFAPM - Brilliant connector and joiner of worlds. 2. Keith Grimes - Genuine clinical AI expert and practitioner. 3. Dr Hugh Harvey - Clinical Regulation Master. 4. Liam Cahill - NHS Sherpa to HealthTech companies. 5. Liz Ashall-Payne - Empowering companies with DTAC compliance. 6. Dr. James Somauroo - HealthTech Marketing done brilliantly. 7. Dr. Vishaal Virani, MBBS - Taking clinical content creation to the next level. 8. Dr Avi Mehra - Unveiling key opportunities in HealthTech. 9. Rachel Murphy - Supporting healthcare business to scale and exit. 10. Yasmin Karsan - Putting clinical safety into healthcare technologies. 11. Aahuti Rai - Helping healthcare businesses grow and flourish. 12. Kevin McDonnell - Leadership and strategy in the wild wild west. 13. Dr Thomas Maggs - Connecting health companies with health professionals. 14. Anushka Patchava MD, MBA - Driving growth and value for healthcare companies. 15. Dr Saira G. - Evidence generation and cybersecurity expert. And so much more! Our village is only as valuable as our villagers. 👇 Who else have I missed? (I am sure I've missed loads!)

122

57 Comments

This week the report ‘A Digital Health Record for Every Citizen’ was published by the team at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (TBI) following significant contribution by Feedback Medical. The report aligns to our vision of the future NHS and outlines a vision for a single patient record which unlocks transformational models of care with the potential to move service delivery out of acute providers and into the community, as called for by Rt. Hon. Wes Streeting MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when he announced that the NHS needs to transform into a #NeighbourhoodHealthService.   FEEDBACK PLC strongly champions the position that the Digital Health Record should be built out from the current core record for the patient, namely the primary care record. Our product Bleepa can augment the primary care record with diagnostic information, making it a one-stop-resource for information relating to the patient. Bleepa’s collaboration and pathway management capabilities further allow the record to be opened up to multiple care settings, ensuring that each provider can work off a common record in a fully informed and connected way.   This builds off the diagnostic pathway model that Bleepa already delivers in the community diagnostic centre (CDC) space, leveraging Feedback’s connections into primary care, secondary care and diagnostic facilities. Bleepa is already a digital glue that brings these providers together around the patient and their journey.   We believe the vision outlined in the TBI paper can be made into a national reality and we look forward to engaging with NHS colleagues and potential primary care partners to take this to patients in a broad range of settings including community care, mental health, social care and ambulance services. Dr Charlotte Refsum Adam Bradshaw Darcy Ward Benedict Macon-Cooney

39

4 Comments

Can the NHS move out of the foothills of digital transformation? Responding to the Darzi report in Digital Health, our CEO and co-founder Dr Rachael Grimaldi says: “Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham OM KBE PC FRS is right to point out that patient care is held back by outdated IT. There are still many areas in the NHS where technology is still a novelty; like language translation and communication. “Using technology to break down communication barriers, especially in some of the most urgent or unplanned situations, is crucial. However, the existing barriers within the NHS must be dismantled to facilitate widespread adoption of technology as quite often change doesn’t filter down to the teams responsible for procurement, innovation, and digital transformation. “It’ll be interesting to see how the new 10-year plan aims to solve the problems highlighted by Darzi and whether we’ll actually see real changes happening to tackle inequality and improve healthcare for everyone.” https://lnkd.in/ebxj-AD6

2