Without high-quality, reliable evidence, the puzzle of healthcare improvement will always be incomplete. At THIS Institute, we're working in collaboration with staff, patients, carers and many others to fill the gaps. We ask tough questions: 👉What really matters to patients? 👉 How can patients and staff be involved in understanding the issues? 👉 Which solutions need to be implemented at scale, and which ones should be local? Learn more about our mission ⤵️
THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute)
Research Services
We're strengthening the evidence base for how to improve healthcare.
About us
At THIS Institute we have an important goal: to create a world-leading scientific asset for the NHS by strengthening the evidence-base for improving the quality and safety of healthcare. Co-created by two exceptional organisations - the University of Cambridge and the Health Foundation – THIS Institute is founded on the guiding principle that efforts to improve care should be based on the best quality evidence. We’re boosting research activity, and creating a new generation of highly trained, multidisciplinary experts with new skills in researching healthcare improvement. Our work is defined by a highly inclusive approach that combines academic rigour with the real concerns of patients and staff. We’re open, transparent, and we do not shy away from difficult subjects. THIS Institute is made possible by the Health Foundation, an independent charity committed to bringing about better health and healthcare for people in the UK. Led by the University of Cambridge, globally renowned for its academic excellence and independence, our strength and influence extends right across the UK. We welcome everyone to help us create an evidence base that supports replicable and scalable improvements to healthcare delivery and patient experiences. Together we’re creating an evidence base to improve healthcare.
- Website
-
http://www.thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk
External link for THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute)
- Industry
- Research Services
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- Cambridge
- Type
- Educational
- Founded
- 2017
- Specialties
- Healthcare improvement research, Research fellowship programme, and Citizen science
Locations
-
Primary
2 Worts Causeway
Cambridge, CB1 8RN, GB
Employees at THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute)
-
Rowena Ironside
Non Executive Director, Chair & Mentor | CEDR Accredited Mediator | Digital, Commercial, Governance, Diversity
-
Sarah Fisher
Women’s Health Advocate | Patient and Public Involvement Leader | Health Research & Service Delivery
-
Robert Pralat
Sociologist at University of Cambridge
-
Danielle Doyle
Strategic Communications & Engagement Lead, THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge
Updates
-
In our biggest conference to date, THIS Space 2024 hosted an array of speakers to discuss the leading research and evidence in improving the quality and safety of healthcare. Five research fellows from our fellowship programme delivered insightful lightning talks exploring varied subjects contributing to the advancing the field of healthcare improvement. Topics ranged from using big data for intelligent blood test ordering to co-designing quality improvement strategies in specialist eating disorder units, to addressing the challenges of national clinical audits in the stroke community, plus sharing learning from mixed methods approaches when examining variation in prescribing practices and implementing new service models for perioperative care for older people. Read the full story and watch the lightning talks here https://ths.im/4iBea7f
-
Healthcare supply chains are critical but often overlooked. They manage everything from medical equipment to linen and food, ensuring supplies reach point-of-care locations efficiently and managing the flow of patients. Good supply chain management (SCM) improves performance and reduces costs without compromising quality. Poor SCM, however, can lead to bottlenecks, fluctuating demand, and inappropriate ad hoc purchasing decisions. Check out the latest in our Elements series for an evidence-based look at some of the core characteristics of effective supply chain management. This one is written by Sharon Williams from Swansea University. It's free to read and download. https://ths.im/49D2RqV
-
There is so much pressure on urgent emergency care services - and the situation is getting worse. A more proactive approach is needed to manage this increasing pressure and achieve high-quality results, while making sure that the system is sustainable long term. THIS Institute and LCP Health Analytics are carrying out an evaluation of the AI-guided clinical coaching in urgent and emergency care programme, which is being carried out by UCLPartners, North East London Integrated Care System, and Health Navigator. The programme aims to support patients and ease pressure on A&E services. It uses routinely collected local hospital data to create bespoke machine learning algorithms and predict high-intensity users of unplanned care. It then offers support via targeted, phone-based clinical coaching with trained healthcare professionals. We aim to gather evidence that will support broader use of the programme, and guide future policies for better proactive care. Find out more ⤵️
Today, in partnership with NHS North East London and HN (Health Navigator), we have launched an AI-driven initiative to transform urgent and emergency care. Combining advanced AI screening with personalised clinical coaching, this proactive programme supports those at high risk of emergency care, reducing hospital demand and improving lives. Over the course of the three year programme we expect to see: 🏥13,000 fewer A&E visits/year 🛌 26,673 unplanned bed days saved across North East London 💙 Significant improvement in patient wellbeing Read more: https://lnkd.in/d9EXeiG3 Barts Health NHS Trust, Shane DeGaris, Paul Gilluley, LCP Health Analytics, THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Mike Osaer, Valentina Karas, Ellie Boden, Sarah Houston, Peter Kirpalani-Collins, Sophie Webster, Simon Swift
-
Congratulations to THIS fellow Mahmood Bhutta who received the Royal College’s 2024 President’s Medal from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow for his contribution to global health and improving sustainability and ethical trade in healthcare. Awarded annually, this accolade recognises outstanding work in the community, either locally, nationally, or internationally. Mahmood is a leading consultant ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeon and campaigner and clinical green lead for University Hospitals Sussex. His fellowship project looks at creating a circular economy to tackle the use of single-use products in healthcare settings. In an article published by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow about the honours, Mahmood said: “I am truly honoured and humbled to receive this award, and the recognition given to the issues of protecting our planet and protecting workers in our medical supply chains.” Learn more about Mahmood’s project: https://ths.im/3Vz7E7j Read more about the Royal College honours: https://ths.im/3ZOjiNW
-
Effective healthcare supply chains are crucial for safe, effective patient care, but managing these supply chains is complex with challenges like underuse, overuse, and misuse of resources. In the latest release from our Cambridge University Press & Assessment Elements series, Sharon Williams from Swansea University provides a practical insight into the design and operation of healthcare supply chains. Read and download it for free: https://ths.im/4g56VD1
-
AI may have considerable potential in healthcare, potentially transforming many aspects of patient care or streamlining administrative processes. Some possible benefits include detecting diseases earlier, making patient care safer, better predicting resource needs, and supporting personalised medicine. But how do healthcare professionals feel about using AI tools in their clinical practice? Our research identified seven areas of concern around the adoption of AI in clinical settings: • Understanding how AI is used. • The amount of trust and confidence people have in AI tools. • Judging the added value of AI. • The availability of data and the limitations of AI. • Balancing time and other priorities. • Concerns about AI governance. • Working together to support the use of AI tools. Healthcare professionals were concerned that they didn’t fully understand how to use AI tools, how the algorithms work, how results are generated, or the reasoning behind the results. This lack of transparency creates barriers to trust, particularly when AI recommendations can differ from clinical judgment. Professionals are reluctant to rely solely on AI, as the responsibility for patient care ultimately rests with them. Other concerns include potential biases in AI worsening health disparities, a lack of guidance, and concerns about governance; there were uncertainties on legal responsibilities for misdiagnosis stemming from AI recommendations. We looked at the available research to discover healthcare professionals’ experiences of AI, and how any challenges could be mitigated. THIS summary: https://ths.im/3ZFv90A Full paper: https://ths.im/4f95QbL
-
All sessions from #THISspace2024 are available to watch now. You can catch up on sessions you missed, watch sessions again, and share with colleagues. Enjoy! https://lnkd.in/eSiyxzd9 Got ten minutes?⌚ Watch lightning talks by fellows and researcher from THIS Institute. 🔹 Strategies for implementing new service models: learning from POPS | Justin Waring https://ths.im/4inVqIr 🔹Mixed methods in healthcare research | Matt Gittus https://ths.im/3ZD95nF 🔹 Personalised uncertainty estimates for intelligent blood test ordering | Jonathan Gillham https://ths.im/4iyIcJ1 🔹What are the challenges of national clinical audit in the community? | Lal Russell https://ths.im/3B24bHn 🔹Exploring the impact of reducing NGT (nasogastric tube) feeding under restraint and co-designing meal support in a specialist eating disorder unit | Helen West https://ths.im/4idm32F 🔹THIS Institute Core Learning Systems | Kristina Wanyonyi Kay https://ths.im/4igh6WF Got 40 minutes? 🕑 🔹 Over-test and over-diagnosis https://ths.im/4ih5KSr 🔹Improving maternity care: The importance of exploring the system and co-designing solutions https://ths.im/41kdpte 🔹 What’s the problem with access to general practice? https://ths.im/4ilCYQv 🔹Today’s challenges in responsible data science and healthcare innovation https://ths.im/41dvyJ2
-
📢Calling all UK-based healthcare professionals with an interest in perioperative care! 📢 Could you help us to explore which metrics would be best to measure care before, during, and after surgery? This project is open to all healthcare professionals working along any part of the perioperative pathway. You can help build the evidence by ranking the metrics that matter most to you. There are two stages to this activity: • The first part is open now • The second part opens in February. We’d love to hear from you! Find out more and register to take part: https://ths.im/3Zy5M0R
-
In a two-part podcast series, Dr Zoë Fritz, consultant at Addenbrooke’s Hospital and Wellcome Fellow in Society and Ethics at THIS Institute, joins Rob Tobin, Partner and Head of UK Medical Law at Kennedys, to discuss advance care planning. Part One introduces the basics of advance care planning and how it supports patients and families with difficult healthcare decisions. Zoe explains that advance care planning is a broad term covering a range of discussions between patients, families, and healthcare providers about preferred future treatments and health outcomes - both for when they can make their own decisions and if they lose the capacity to decide for themselves. Part Two explores the ReSPECT (Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment) process, which provides personalised recommendations for how a patient should be looked after in an emergency. The episode also covers how to choose the best time to discuss important care decisions, the importance of sharing decision-making with family and carers, and making sure that medical treatments align with the patient's best interests. These podcast episodes also address handling uncertainties in patient preferences, the role of lasting power of attorney, and how to approach advance decisions to refuse treatment. Listen to Zoe and Rob discussing the issues surrounding advance care planning on the Kennedys Medical Law Matters podcast. Listen here: https://ths.im/3Z8MKws