Juggling the gadgets: Binary-level code randomization using instruction displacement

H Koo, M Polychronakis - Proceedings of the 11th ACM on Asia …, 2016 - dl.acm.org
Proceedings of the 11th ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and …, 2016dl.acm.org
Code diversification is an effective mitigation against return-oriented programming attacks,
which breaks the assumptions of attackers about the location and structure of useful
instruction sequences, known as" gadgets". Although a wide range of code diversification
techniques of varying levels of granularity exist, most of them rely on the availability of
source code, debug symbols, or the assumption of fully precise code disassembly, limiting
their practical applicability for the protection of closed-source third-party applications. In …
Code diversification is an effective mitigation against return-oriented programming attacks, which breaks the assumptions of attackers about the location and structure of useful instruction sequences, known as "gadgets". Although a wide range of code diversification techniques of varying levels of granularity exist, most of them rely on the availability of source code, debug symbols, or the assumption of fully precise code disassembly, limiting their practical applicability for the protection of closed-source third-party applications. In-place code randomization has been proposed as an alternative binary-compatible diversification technique that is tolerant of partial disassembly coverage, in the expense though of leaving some gadgets intact, at the disposal of attackers. Consequently, the possibility of constructing robust ROP payloads using only the remaining non-randomized gadgets is still open. In this paper we present instruction displacement, a code diversification technique based on static binary instrumentation that does not rely on complete code disassembly coverage. Instruction displacement aims to improve the randomization coverage and entropy of existing binary-level code diversification techniques by displacing any remaining non-randomized gadgets to random locations. The results of our experimental evaluation demonstrate that instruction displacement reduces the number of non-randomized gadgets in the extracted code regions from 15.04% for standalone in-place code randomization, to 2.77% for the combination of both techniques. At the same time, the additional indirection introduced due to displacement incurs a negligible runtime overhead of 0.36% on average for the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks.
ACM Digital Library
Showing the best result for this search. See all results